Jump to content

cocoscacao

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,006

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

970 Excellent

Community Answers

1

See answers

2 Followers

Profile Information

  • About me
    Armchair Armstrong

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. cocoscacao
    Well I did use the word 'might', not 'would'. You can technically screw up anything, so there's no guarantee. Even so, failed refurbishing with 2 years of development vs failed new game with 7+ years of development... You get the point.
  2. cocoscacao
    I am assuming you are taking SZ video as info source. Original plan was a refurbished KSP1. When asked for more time to include more features in the game, a simple NO would put an end to those plans, and we might be in better position than we are today.
  3. cocoscacao
    We add beef salad sometimes. Though I doubt the rest of the world would call that mixture a salad. Bom apetite I guess xD
  4. cocoscacao
    Out of curiosity, which toppings added on the pizza are considered criminal by you?
  5. cocoscacao
    No. Each player would have a bubble. You can time warp independently from other player, until two vessels meet. Then reconciliation happens. This has several problems. How DO vessels meet, if they're on different timelines? If you're the one lagging behind, and reconciliation starts unfolding, your timeline speeds up, potentially crashing other vessels to planets/moons. At least, this is what I gather from Nate's talk. I will try to find the source. If this is the case, then it's crazy.
  6. cocoscacao
    Art style and technical inefficiencies are two different things. Edit: Take Dishonored 2 for example. At launch, it was an unoptimized mess and resource hog. Over time, they patched things up. The art-style remained the same (duh), but game started performing better. Was it the art-style issue? No. The game was unoptimized. I have a few issues with KSP 2 art-style, sure (fonts & other minor things), but KSP 2 still is (a very bad) EA. Thus, unfinished, unoptimized, with lots of room for improvement. But overall, it's art-style is fine for me.
  7. cocoscacao
    Unless someone already replied, everyone had their own timeline, until two vessels meet. Then there's a time difference reconciliation. Which is crazy, if you ask me.
  8. cocoscacao
    But it's still an EA. Blah blah, badly handled, blah blah price. Still an EA. Officially unfinished product.
  9. cocoscacao
    Multiplayer is fine in its simplest form. Time syncing they were planning was... Uhm... Impossible? Convoluted? PS, that LS draft was really, really good.
  10. cocoscacao
    Plus, realistic graphics don't age well. I can still play Neverhood and ignore 30 years of progress in the rendering department.
  11. cocoscacao
    Indeed. On a more serious note, regarding the overarching vision of the game as @Vl3d put it, we still have no idea what that was/is. Grab graphical and audio assets & move on.
  12. cocoscacao
    Let me just start by saying that ALL of you are wrong...
  13. cocoscacao
    Remarks are inherently personal, no? I knew this forum is an incarnation of Orwell's 1984. As Mel Gibson once yelled... FREEEEDOOOOOOM!!!
  14. cocoscacao
    @never_do ChatGpt came out 2 years ago. Ksp2 was in development for 7 (?) years. Thus, I doubt it.
  15. cocoscacao
    Those who lie 'cause they're incompetent to provide any value in any other way... and swim perfectly fine due to system which probably arose through them... Yes, I am going to hate the players. Otherwise, the future isn't very bright.
×
×
  • Create New...