kspbutitscursed

banned by kilauea

do not Panic

Common Sense Skeptic is that you

Banned by me for being banned by kilauea volcan0

Floor 4296 Starship full stack with S25 AND B9

Banned for using css and thunderbolt as reliable sources lol

banned for not adressing any of my points come on dude i took like 15 minutes to write all of that up i used my calculator to get the percentage at least adress some of my points if you cant i win the argument

scrapstarhaters hating on those that Belive common sense skeptic

floor 4294 @AlamoVampire a sign that reads like this from me ok starlink satilites that are OPERATIONAL are not pollutants theya re just normal satilites that are a lot more volumeous than normal satilites Starlink is not the only mega constellation there is Kuiper and One Webb ect the tension rods on the starlink V1.5 missions are the only main space pollutants the tension rods for the V2 sats are attached to the second stage for deorbit. When starship starts to launch full size V2's in a few months there will be NO space pollutants the launches themselves are not to bad they account for less than 1 percent of the carbon output train and cars and airplanes cause more pollution than SpaceX I dont get where your argument is coming from also space shuttle launched 135 times with 2 failures. 98.51% failure rate falcon 9 with 253 times to date with 2 failures 99.20% failure rate Starship with 1 flight and 1 failure with a 100% failure rate at PRESENT with another launch this month that will probably make it to staging soo yeah i dont get what you mean by spacex being a polluter they literally work with the FAA to MITAGATE enviromental harm Soory for the long post

not impressed

banned by S25 (Ban the user above me)

FAA licence SOOOOOOOOOOOn

banned for finding excuses ok starlink satilites that are OPERATIONAL are not pollutants theya re just normal satilites that are a lot more volumeous than normal satilites Starlink is not the only mega constellation there is Kuiper and One Webb ect the tension rods on the starlink V1.5 missions are the only main space pollutants the tension rods for the V2 sats are attached to the second stage for deorbit. When starship starts to launch full size V2's in a few months there will be NO space pollutants the launches themselves are not to bad they account for less than 1 percent of the carbon output train and cars and airplanes cause more pollution than SpaceX I dont get where your argument is coming from also space shuttle launched 135 times with 2 failures. 98.51% failure rate falcon 9 with 253 times to date with 2 failures 99.20% failure rate Starship with 1 flight and 1 failure with a 100% failure rate at PRESENT with another launch this month that will probably make it to staging soo yeah i dont get what you mean by spacex being a polluter they literally work with the FAA to MITAGATE enviromental harm Soory for the long post

p-34

p-34 making a move

banned for thining that falcon 9 is faulty hint only starship at the momet is unreliable

banned by the FAA

p-36 making progress

i belive its community resource pack

CLICK

p-29 stay on target

5663

floor 4279 IDK oh look a dot thats getting closer............................

granted they grow massive and you can no longer land on laythe I wish for more Falcon heavy launches next year

banned for not using SLS