Sirrobert

Can you show us a screenshot? That should help us help

Nah, he doesn't talk about early acces games. Prepare yourself once 1.0 comes around though

As Harvester explained in one of his recent blog posts: Game first, Simulation second

Aaw, now what am I going to do with this bouquet I built out of rockets

Sure, but this is Kerbin. On Kerbin, that's just 'awesome'

Or is she glaring because she wants you to [FLUFFY BUNNIES] of so she can play

You mean fairings? I'm pritty sure that has been entirely replaced by procedual fairings mod, which can make them on the fly in game, without having to download them

Offcourse there are no females here. For that matter, there are no males either. Personally, I'm a squid In all seriousness, what does it matter? Personally, when I interect with someone through a media that makes it impossible to tell gender, I just asume they are gender neutral. Because for the purpose of my interaction with them, they might aswel be

For us, yes basicly. Sometimes people put something somewhere and it blocks acces to something else. It should be possible to knock of the blocking part with wack-a-kerbal and keep the rest of the ship intact. Though I don't recomend trying it without a quicksave. Funfact, you can also blow up the buildings in KSC with wack-a-kerbal Remember, Alt F12 is a debugging tool. Sometimes you need to blow something up to test something

That would depend on what you concider cheating. Is it cheating to automate a task you have already done 5000 times? Most people would call that automation And that information, it may use some behind the scenes info to give you that information, but in my opinion, you should have acces to that information anyway. I see it as the team of scientists behind the scenes, constantly cranking the data

Maybe in 5 years they could start on a sequal with some brand new technology, but I agree with the rest

If a construction is pissing you off, you can shoot it instead of just terminating. Way more satisfying

How long does that 11 billion old star have to live?

Look at the Mission time. Those 2 pictures are 3 minutes apart, not an entire orbit

Very usefull argument, thank you for your input

Yup, can't see how that could go wrong

Look again. The altimeter at the top reads 179km, and 150km. Kerbins atomsphere ends at 70km

Space tourism? I missed that, where did you read it? The problem with this suggestion is the same problem with all time baised drain things. Parts of the game involve timewarping for big stretches of time. Like if you want to play with your Duna lander NOW. While there are people who don't like to timewarp for longer than a few weeks at a time, there are also people that do. A time based drain on any recourse would limit the way you can play this game, forcing you to interupt timewarp every month or so to do grind contracts that achieve nothing

A mass extinction event doesn't destroy life. It just changes it. Nature will adept to our influence. The only questions are if WE survive that change, and how it will look after everything is done

Same way as all quicksaves in all games , F5 and F9

Wasn't our Moon formed by a collison between earth and another planet? So collisions are not unheard of, while a planet taking a 1 orbit trip out ot Jupiter to get ripped up, and than back to a regular orbt is

For that the question would be, is it cheaper to make multiple transport runs between the asteroid and the target, or to haul the asteroid to the target.

Intriguing idea. But what could possible cause a single flyby, followed by a stable orbit?

Now THAT is an awesome implention of this idea. We need a testbed for rovers already, so if you could set simulator gravity and a small area to try out rovers, that'd be awesome

So I did miss it. Thanks