Jump to content

coolitic

Members
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by coolitic

  1. Unity 5 has 64 bit and multi core. Thats all I need to know.
  2. Lock this thread. This is on do not suggest list and I am quite tired of these kinds of posts.
  3. Claw doing fuel transfer is a bit unrealistic (unless it's 2 claws attaching to each other), and the drawback of it is less stability and more break-ability.
  4. Everyone wants the option to mass delete orbital junk for a while now. Why the devs don't do it is something I don't know.
  5. I like the idea of better power management, but not in the way you suggested it.
  6. Would be nice. Wouldn't wander off very far and would stay away from cliffs. Maybe custom pathing.
  7. I am a serial kerbal killer. I find it most amusing.
  8. I have always wanted ksp to have this, but should be done later.
  9. Pointless. Takes out all the fun of killing kerbals.
  10. Please just start banning people who keep posting about stuff in the Dont suggest list. Im getting quite tired of it.
  11. No, atomic engines are much better than ion. The only drawback is size and weight. Still, ions cannot reliably do most maneuvers without wasting tons of time.
  12. Better lights is in do not suggest list i believe.
  13. There is something like this called the kerbalizer. Find it on the main website. I dont want the devs wasting time on more of this.
  14. At first I thought you meant these Anyways, wouldn't higher weight make you more likely to die in high-grav planets like eve? Also exo suit would make the weight of craft higher.
  15. Except the craft would get instantly destroyed on launch. Unless you are sending a heavy duty, small probe it wouldn't do anything.
  16. I agree, there should at least be warning. Maybe the craft would go into a "ghost" mode?
  17. Yup. They are stupider by orders of magnitude, but I guess since they can make rocket parts so they may have a few "sparks" of intellect. Also, they must have been blessed with luck for all their make-shift parts to work right and the fact that they could survive alone.
  18. Can we just start banning the OP's of these threads? I cannot take another "idea" THATS ON THE DO NOT SUGGEST LIST.
  19. YES, PLEASE. Since Unity refuses to make windows multi-core stable, WE NEED THIS.
  20. You are basically suggesting auto-pilot but are just using a different word. Admins should start banning people who keep posting do not suggest (for a week or so). I don't necessarily mean you OP
×
×
  • Create New...