Jump to content

[1.12.x] USI Life Support

RoverDude

By RoverDude
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

RoverDude

RoverDude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, Arigitine said:

I ran in to mod conflict between

Pathfinder

USI Life support

Surface Experiment Pack

If run the 3 mod it causes the pathfinder stop working cant inflate buildings i figure i just let you know :kiss:

Probably better for the Pathfinder thread if your issue is with buildings inflating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thygrrr

Thygrrr

Posted
Posted (edited)

Am I doing something wrong...? My badass/orange Kerbals aren't immune to the tourist downgrade effect and will go on strike.

I had this issue since KSP 1.1, so I wondered whether it was another mod causing it.

Edited by Thygrrr
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aelfhe1m

Aelfhe1m

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Thygrrr said:

Am I doing something wrong...? My badass/orange Kerbals aren't immune to the tourist downgrade effect and will go on strike.

I had this issue since KSP 1.1, so I wondered whether it was another mod causing it.

It's been quite a few versions since the vets were immune by default. If you want that behaviour it is a configuration option that's available by clicking the USI-LS green cube icon on the main space centre scene to open the Life Support Setup dialog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
notthebobo

notthebobo

Posted
Posted

I'm updating the Wiki Example page and am having trouble with the Habitation section.

The Hitchhiker Storage Container affects the Habitation by "25 kerbal months", which is really 21 plus the four coming from the four seats.

The KSP Wiki shows a month is 38.6 hours long, or 6.433 days.  If so, then the example would show that the trip is 

1,150 days * 3 Kerbals = 3,450 kerbal days

which in kerbal months is 

3,450 days / 6.433 days per month = 536.27 kerbal months

Since each Hitchhiker adds 25 kerbal months, before getting into multipliers, you'd need almost 22 Hitchhikers. 

536.27 kerbal months / 25 kerbal months per hitchhiker = 21.45 Hitchhikers

Is that correct?  The kerbal months converted to hours don't seem right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
danfarnsy

danfarnsy

Posted
Posted
57 minutes ago, notthebobo said:

The KSP Wiki shows a month is 38.6 hours long, or 6.433 days. 

 

 

I'm confident that's not the same definition of a Kerbal month used here. If a standard month is 30 days, 30 kerbal days are a kerbal month, or 7.5 earth days, or 180 hours. It's not tied to the orbital period of the Mun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brigadier

Brigadier

Posted
Posted

KSP 1.3.1, USI LS 0.7.0.0

FYI, I'm getting the following error in my log file, line 21684.

Quote

Texture load error in 'D:\Programs\Games\Steam\steamapps\common\KSP v1.3.1\GameData\UmbraSpaceIndustries\LifeSupport\Supplies.dds'

I have no idea if it's significant.  I was parsing the log for another reason and noticed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MagicCuboid

MagicCuboid

Posted
Posted (edited)

I love USI-LS, but I'm having a bit of trouble with my Minmus lander and I'm not sure if it's due to mod conflict or because I'm running 1.3.1.

So, I have a ship that gives about 132 days Hab/Home time for a crew of two  who are both level 1 (it has an Itinerant Storage Container from NearFuture and the Mk2 Lander Can). I get into Minmus' orbit just fine, though for some reason my scientist has 10 days less of Hab time left than my Engineer does.

When I undock the Mk2 my Scientist's Hab time plummets to red/failure as soon as the pod gets out of logistics, while the Engineer (properly) drops to 7. It says my Scientist is homesick and refuses to work, but his Home level is still buffed from the Itinerant Storage Container. Am I missing something?

EDIT I found a workaround: I placed the scientist in the Itinerant Storage Container before undocking the Mk2 lander, then EVA'd him back into the lander, moved out of range, and he is now happy as a clam.

Edited by MagicCuboid
Link to comment
Share on other sites
flart

flart

Posted
Posted (edited)

@RoverDude  Malemute_RoverCrewCab and Malemute_RoverCab don't have ModuleHabitation, but same passenger cabin and truck cabin at FelineUtilityRover has it. If it's about "love staring out the window", then Malemute more habitated then Feline.

Found this patch in FelineUtilityRover, changed for Malemute, but what is ModuleLifeSupport, ReplacementParts, and USI_ModuleFieldRepair, do I need them?

Spoiler 

@PART[Malemute_RoverCrewCab]:NEEDS[USILifeSupport]
{
	MODULE
	{
		name = ModuleLifeSupport
	}
	
	RESOURCE
	{
		name = ReplacementParts
		amount = 2500
		maxAmount = 2500
	}

	MODULE 
	{
		name = ModuleHabitation
		BaseKerbalMonths = 20
		CrewCapacity = 4
		BaseHabMultiplier = 0
		ConverterName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat
		StartActionName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat.start
		StopActionName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat.stop		
		INPUT_RESOURCE
		{
			ResourceName = ElectricCharge
			Ratio = 0.45
		}
	}	
	
	MODULE
	{
		name = USI_ModuleFieldRepair
	}
}

@PART[Malemute_RoverCab]:NEEDS[USILifeSupport]
{

	MODULE
	{
		name = ModuleLifeSupport
	}
	
	RESOURCE
	{
		name = ReplacementParts
		amount = 100
		maxAmount = 100
	}

	
	MODULE 
	{
		name = ModuleHabitation
		BaseKerbalMonths = 0
		CrewCapacity = 2
		BaseHabMultiplier = 1.0
		ConverterName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat
		StartActionName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat.start
		StopActionName = #LOC_FUR.USILS.habitat.stop	
		INPUT_RESOURCE
		{
			ResourceName = ElectricCharge
			Ratio = 0.075
		}
	}
	

	MODULE
	{
		name = USI_ModuleFieldRepair
	}

}

 

=======

bug report:

Look at the second habitation details string (max crue calculation). The multiplier, and therefore result max crue habitation depend from how many kerbal  putted in the rover (crue column).  Also, I miss a enabled/disabled habitation function at the life support status window at VAB.
screenshots:  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/cozgjyg9l6jltp9/AACQq1HvI8jBi0ZTnIwa_oVza?dl=0

=======

Spoiler

@notthebobo    wiki:

Quote

A kerbal can sit in her crash couch for 30 days before getting grumpy.

Formula for the enabled habitation is (basetime * max_crew + extratime) * multiplier / crew * month

base_time is equal 0.25 (screenshots above), so 1 month * basetime = 30*0.25 = 7,5 days

========

What is the idea behind extratime vs multiplier?
When you create a new part how you choose? It's both just increase a habitation time at a comfortable window-ish module.
I don't understand that, so my proposal is below.

Spoiler
  • 3rd habitation mode:
  1. off                           — no consume                      — formula:   basetime *  max_crew  / crew * 1 month
  2. "window staring"   — EC  consume                      — formula:   (basetime * max_crew)/ crew * multiplier * 1 month
    pretty modules where large pretty windows, so every kerbal can increase their wellbeing (#2) or without EC they cannot do that (#1). Multiplier don't have "crew affected", it's affect all kerbals.
  3. "canteen-ish"         — EC and food consume    — formula:   (basetime * max_crew  + extratime)/ crew * 1 month
    dormitory-like modules. Kerbals (limited count) can just sleep (#1) or eat, sleep, and have fun (#3), that  increase their wellbeing there. ExtraTime still has "crew affected".
  • Habitation mode switcher at the life support status window at VAB.

UPD. And... in #3 it still possible change extratime to multiplier, so I don't understand why it's need to be there.

I don't sure what "month" need to be separate column, it makes things more complicated. Rename basetime → basemonths and extratime → extramonths, or multiply basetime and extratime by 30 to get basedays and extradays, month is debatable time period.

Edited by flart
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BRAAAP_STUTUTU

BRAAAP_STUTUTU

Posted
Posted
On 11/4/2017 at 2:53 AM, Aelfhe1m said:

It's been quite a few versions since the vets were immune by default. If you want that behaviour it is a configuration option that's available by clicking the USI-LS green cube icon on the main space centre scene to open the Life Support Setup dialog.

I'm not the guy you originally replied to but chaning it to none doesn't seem to affect anything, they still become tourists (yes i have their names in the list) do i need to run KSP in admin mode maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tsaven

tsaven

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, RobinVerhulstZ said:

I'm not the guy you originally replied to but chaning it to none doesn't seem to affect anything, they still become tourists (yes i have their names in the list) do i need to run KSP in admin mode maybe?

"Admin mode"?

Post a screenshot of your USI-LS config window if you won't mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BRAAAP_STUTUTU

BRAAAP_STUTUTU

Posted
Posted
Just now, tsaven said:

"Admin mode"?

Post a screenshot of your USI-LS config window if you won't mind.

Hmm, after looking up the issues list on github, it seems USI-LS doesn't like how Galileo's Planet Pack changes the Kerbal last name (Kerman) to Gaelan... is there a way to fix this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tsaven

tsaven

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, RobinVerhulstZ said:

Hmm, after looking up the issues list on github, it seems USI-LS doesn't like how Galileo's Planet Pack changes the Kerbal last name (Kerman) to Gaelan... is there a way to fix this?

Probably best to dig through GPP's configs and remove the part that changes the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted
22 hours ago, RobinVerhulstZ said:

Hmm, after looking up the issues list on github, it seems USI-LS doesn't like how Galileo's Planet Pack changes the Kerbal last name (Kerman) to Gaelan... is there a way to fix this?

That feature is currently unstable but should be stable in the next GPP update. For the time being, just delete GPP\GPP_Renamer\ to restore "Kerman" and cure its problem(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tsaven

tsaven

Posted
Posted

Wanted some extra sets of eyes on a config for another mod, if anyone else who's very familiar wants to chime in.

I'm doing a brief balance pass on KPBS parts using RoverDude's spreadsheet.  I've taken some notes here with planned changes, does anyone have any input before I submit a PR to the KPBS developer?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQYEpfq3YMRCbIYQUJdH_hyT2GsjzMR_nPrIBD7Seb0/edit?usp=sharing

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tyko

Tyko

Posted
Posted

Is it possible to give a crewed part a negative habitability modifier - essentially make it cramped?

the use case is Soyuz capsules. The descent module can hold 3 crew, but it’s a lot more cramped than a Mk1-2 capsule. Adding the round crew compartment to the Soyuz capsule gives the crew more elbow room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LameLefty

LameLefty

Posted
Posted (edited)

I've been slowly working my way through this (loooooooong!) thread with an eye towards adding a life support and/or colonization aspect to my game. Along these lines I've started a sandbox save and have been launching various configurations to try to figure out how everything all works. And yes, I've read through the Wiki on GitHub.

Now, first questions: #1) can someone explain to me why the Habitation values vary so much between the VAB and on-orbit? And #2) Can anyone explain why I cannot deploy the habitat ring once in space? I can do it in the VAB, but once in orbit the option disappears from the context menu.

screenshot196_zpsysjlwchu.png

screenshot197_zpss7j2xxr3.png

I've read and/or skimmed up through about page 175 of this thread but it's a lot to try to take in, especially as both LSI and MKS/OKS have evolved over time. 

Edited by LameLefty
Fixed typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenpsp

goldenpsp

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, LameLefty said:

I've been slowly working my way through this (loooooooong!) thread with an eye towards adding a life support and/or colonization aspect to my game. Along these lines I've started a sandbox save and have been launching various configurations to try to figure out how everything all works. And yes, I've read through the Wiki on GitHub.

Now, first questions: #1) can someone explain to me why the Habitation values vary so much between the VAB and on-orbit? And #2) Can anyone explain why I cannot deploy the habitat ring once in space? I can do it in the VAB, but once in orbit the option disappears from the context menu.

 

 

I've read and/or skimmed up through about page 175 of this thread but it's a lot to try to take in, especially as both LSI and MKS/OKS have evolved over time. 

Not sure the details of #1 but some parts require that you turn habitation on in order for it to work properly.  This could account for the discrepancy.

2. The habitat ring needs to be deployed via a kerbal on EVA (engineer?) and will require materialkits as well.

 

By the way the wiki is very helpful.  For example here is the entry for the habitation ring.

https://github.com/UmbraSpaceIndustries/MKS/wiki/Parts-(Tundra-Series)#mks-tundra-habitation-ring

 

Edited by goldenpsp
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LameLefty

LameLefty

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, goldenpsp said:

Not sure the details of #1 but some parts require that you turn habitation on in order for it to work properly.  This could account for the discrepancy.

2. The habitat ring needs to be deployed via a kerbal on EVA (engineer?) and will require materialkits as well.

Ah, thank you for #2! As for #1, I tried to show in the screenshot that all the parts that CAN have activated habitation have been activated (basically, the two observation cupolas plus the habitation ring). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenpsp

goldenpsp

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, LameLefty said:

Ah, thank you for #2! As for #1, I tried to show in the screenshot that all the parts that CAN have activated habitation have been activated (basically, the two observation cupolas plus the habitation ring). 

yea sorry my old eyes couldn't read the screenshots very well and even when I clicked on them photobucket just spammed ads on top so I gave up. That being said it could simply be because you won't get the habitation until the ring is expanded.

Edited by goldenpsp
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LameLefty

LameLefty

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, goldenpsp said:

yea sorry my old eyes couldn't read the screenshots very well and even when I clicked on them photobucket just spammed ads on top so I gave up. That being said it could simply be because you won't get the habitation until the ring is expanded.

Sorry 'bout that. Photobucket has really gone down hill lately. I need to move over to Imgur or something but the KSP Forums are the only forums I frequent that don't allow direct image uploads. Oh well. Anyway, thanks for the help. Lemme see about expanding the habitat ring and see how it goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
goldenpsp

goldenpsp

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LameLefty said:

Sorry 'bout that. Photobucket has really gone down hill lately. I need to move over to Imgur or something but the KSP Forums are the only forums I frequent that don't allow direct image uploads. Oh well. Anyway, thanks for the help. Lemme see about expanding the habitat ring and see how it goes. 

Yea I've used Imgur for years for forum pics, works better (at least until they try to monetize like photobucket).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RoverDude

RoverDude

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 hours ago, Tyko said:

Is it possible to give a crewed part a negative habitability modifier - essentially make it cramped?

the use case is Soyuz capsules. The descent module can hold 3 crew, but it’s a lot more cramped than a Mk1-2 capsule. Adding the round crew compartment to the Soyuz capsule gives the crew more elbow room.

Technically it should work with a negative value, but I have never tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...