Jump to content

Ksp at 60fps, I just can't get enough of it


322997am

Recommended Posts

So I finally got my new pc running and I downloaded Ksp and then I boot it up and it boots in under five seconds. I got an ssd so it boots insanely fast. I built a quick plane and it turned out to fly very well. It was just a 4 passenger passenger plane that weighed very little(a bus can plow through it) and it flew not very fast. But because of its tiny 5t weight it was extremely nimble. So I called it Jedediah airlines flight Jeb-1 with service to the island airport. I flew it to there and back and I'm sitting there and my brain cannot get away from the thought of OMG 120FRAMES PERSECOND. I love the smoothness of my new pc and plane. So now I have a huge urge to play Ksp for the frames and for the content. So thank you squad for making such an enjoyable game that has been a huge fun to me even with the old 30 fps that i got. And now I can enjoy it even moar.

Edited by 322997am
Okay fine my average is 60
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/26/2015 at 3:25 PM, cantab said:

Nice. Sadly I doubt you'll maintain that framerate when you make more complex craft.

Expand  

This.

 I have an i7 4790k which is one of if not the fastest for single core performance and at 250 or more parts I start to get lag. I really hope 1.1 bring s performance up to what it was in 0.90.

Edited by Majorjim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/26/2015 at 8:04 PM, KerbMav said:

Open the settings.cfg in your KSP folder and look for FRAMERATE_LIMIT = x - set the x to what you want.
For me it lowers the load on my GPU especially when solar panels are involved, somehow those let it work like crazy.
 

Expand  

I believe it's in the settings too without having to edit a file.

 

I'd be happy just to get one second per second, even if it's at a low (10-12) fps.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/26/2015 at 8:04 PM, KerbMav said:

Open the settings.cfg in your KSP folder and look for FRAMERATE_LIMIT = x - set the x to what you want.
For me it lowers the load on my GPU especially when solar panels are involved, somehow those let it work like crazy.
 

Expand  

KSP is not GPU heavy, its your CPU limiting the frames and that is a function of physics not graphics, more parts = less frames

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/28/2015 at 8:35 AM, Whackjob said:

Now imagine that at five frames per second. 

The full Whackjob launch experience.   ;)

Expand  

Meh.. The state of the game at the moment, that happens to everyone.

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:32 AM, joekidd1992 said:

I'd like to know the stats of the OP as well. I'm kinda/sorta in the market to build a new one. This will be the first one I have ever built.

Expand  

Buy an i7 4790k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:32 AM, joekidd1992 said:

I'd like to know the stats of the OP as well. I'm kinda/sorta in the market to build a new one. This will be the first one I have ever built.

Expand  

It's an Intel i5 4790 k with 16gb ram and 2gb gpu. I get those frames while flying above the ocean with no textures but the plane.

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:10 PM, Majorjim said:

Meh.. The state of the game at the moment, that happens to everyone.

Buy an i7 4790k

Expand  

No game ever uses hyper threading. The main difference between an i7 and an i5 is that one has hyper threading and one does not. I don't even think Ksp 1.1 will use it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:28 PM, 322997am said:

It's an Intel i5 4790 k with 16gb ram and 2gb gpu. I get those frames while flying above the ocean with no textures but the plane.

Expand  

You mean i7? I don't think there is an i5 4790k.

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:28 PM, 322997am said:

It's an Intel i5 4790 k with 16gb ram and 2gb gpu. I get those frames while flying above the ocean with no textures but the plane.

Expand  

Also, the CPU is going to pay dividends in the newer versions. I hope. ;-)

  On 12/28/2015 at 2:28 PM, 322997am said:

It's an Intel i5 4790 k with 16gb ram and 2gb gpu. I get those frames while flying above the ocean with no textures but the plane.

No game ever uses hyper threading. The main difference between an i7 and an i5 is that one has hyper threading and one does not. I don't even think Ksp 1.1 will use it

Expand  

No sorry that is not correct. Also there is no such CPU as an i5 4790k. You must be mistaken. The i7 4790k is a lot faster than the best i5. Hyperthreading is just a bonus.

 

 Have a look here: http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i7-4790K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4690K

You can see the i7 outpaces the i5 at every step. And you just lost HALF your FPS! what happened? :D

Edited by Majorjim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if you achieve these 60 fps, Shadowplay may transparently miss some of frames on recording. Some dozens of frames, perhaps.


So the rocket behaves more "discrete" compared to 30 fps.

 

 

I have met the problem with mods only, especially when a *lot* of shaders applies.


Mostly ran the game on maximum settings.


But simply raising the FPS number is not a panacea :(


Limiting FPS is a smart idea, though, due to heat issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...