BluePhoenixV Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Quick question, how could i change the config from many stars with some planets to few stars with many planets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 22 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said: I tried in a fresh KSP folder and got memory limit problems (I guess I accidentally launched in 32bit) but then I saw only Kopernicus star /galaxy errors and NRE flood. It's as though Kopernicus does not see the extra stars or they are missing a parameter. It might help that I loaded a couple of other mods simultaneously and quite possibly it could be a bizarre mis-step of MM . Well... Hmm... Did you use custom or auto? Did you generate black holes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) I used auto, yes. I wasn't expecting black holes or any extra-special phenomenon. o.o Quote *****totoro***** Creation Date: 17:23:38 01-19-2017 Generation Mode: a Seed: 99 Galaxy Type: 1 Cluster Number: 0 Planets: y Asteroids: y Red Dwarves: 22 Yellow Dwarves: 11 White Stars: 9 Blue Giants: 1 Brown Dwarves: 15 White Dwarves: 4 ----------------- 78 Stars 29 Planets 49 Moons 36 Asteroids 192 Total ----------------- This is my last setup and I had the errors with it. Edited January 20, 2017 by JadeOfMaar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 10 minutes ago, JadeOfMaar said: I used auto, yes. I wasn't expecting black holes or any extra-special phenomenon. o.o This is my last setup and I had the errors with it. Hold on i'll test that seed myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 @JadeOfMaar Can you send me your config? 1 hour ago, BluePhoenixV said: Quick question, how could i change the config from many stars with some planets to few stars with many planets? You cant as of yet. But i will add a planet frequency variable in the next update Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 (edited) @daniel l. here you go. Edited January 20, 2017 by JadeOfMaar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 Excuse me guys but my internet speed has just been throttled down to... ZERO i will need a little while. YES! My internet has been resurrected! I am back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 On 1/18/2017 at 3:39 PM, Amus said: Fine job and idea ye've got here and it seems to be coming off rather well. I hope ye work out the 'home screen' issue (where it doesn't show KSC or any of the buildings that you can select) because what that also means is you can't upgrade any of the facilities in a campaign game. I prefer to play it that way, over a true sandbox, meself. Apart from that and some of the more technical issues that have been mentioned already, by folk who are probably more clever than I (the frequency of rather exotic orbital planes and whatnot) that i'm sure have more to do with the randomness of a random generator than anything else, it's looking good. I hope ye keep at it and someday my lil green dudes might actually have someplace to go with their shiny new FTL capable ship. On a side note, I did notice one more glitch/feature (tho i'm sure i'm not the first) You can indeed integrate a generated galaxy into an existing save... but any flights that were in progress (including landed bases) will be re-positioned to completely random planets, stars, etc. Likely because of the program's reuse of existing data to generate the new systems. It was interesting and provided a quick way to peek at far flung star systems tho. That is actually a side effect of installing just about any planet mod out there. Rule of thumb with planet mods is don't add them to an existing save. On 1/18/2017 at 5:46 PM, daniel l. said: The issue of integration will be fixed in 0.2.5 so enjoy it while it lasts. But don't worry. I'm intending to package a hyperdrive part that will come with 0.3 (probably releasing it in about two months.) It will use @RoverDude's Alcubierre drive mod as a dependancy (You will have to install his mod before the hyperdrive works of course.) But it will be capable of getting you to those far flung stars within a natural human lifespan (I'm quite convinced that sublight travel at maximum timewarp would probably take many months of IRL time.) Awwww man! I just want the planets, not the parts! I do not think its a wise idea to package in both parts and planets in a single mod. I'm sorry, but that kinda takes the fun out of it for those of us who just want a planets mod and want to pick which warp drives to use if any, and not be forced to go with one particular one. I for one dislike the alcubirre drive, and do not want to have to install it with TBG. Honestly you will have much much better success having it just be an independent (except for kopernicus but that's kinda a given) planet pack, and highly recommending and linking mebbe your top five warp drive mods. Also what happened to the super cool idea of having a wormhole network you promised earlier would be in 0.3? It makes me sad to think that we would just cop out and be dependent on a warp mod instead of the awesome and new idea of wormholes. But the real, practical problem with being dependent on the alcubierre drive mod is what if RoverDude ever stops updating it? Then TBG is also screwed. I really do not think that would be a good idea. I was really hyped about the wormholes too. @JadeOfMaar am I way off here? If anyone thinks I am, then please do tell me. But I just want the planets, not a parts pack. Maybe you can make one on the side, specially designed to accompany TBG, and that would give the player a choice whether to have the parts or not. But please don't make TBG a parts mod. I love the wormhole idea, and I think its an ingenious way around the size of the galaxy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Mycroft said: Also what happened to the super cool idea of having a wormhole network you promised earlier would be in 0.3? It makes me sad to think that we would just cop out and be dependent on a warp mod instead of the awesome and new idea of wormholes. But the real, practical problem with being dependent on the alcubierre drive mod is what if RoverDude ever stops updating it? Then TBG is also screwed. I really do not think that would be a good idea. I was really hyped about the wormholes too. @JadeOfMaar The wormholes were being developed by @User.txt But he appears to have... Gone away. That is why i'm resorting to warp mods. Because in other words. It's really not possible to cross ten light years of KSP space using sublight engines. 2 minutes ago, Mycroft said: Maybe you can make one on the side, specially designed to accompany TBG, and that would give the player a choice whether to have the parts or not. But please don't make TBG a parts mod. Already planned. I intend to release it bundled with 0.3 but in a separate folder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Just now, daniel l. said: The wormholes were being developed by @User.txt But he appears to have... Gone away. That is why i'm resorting to warp mods. Because in other words. It's really not possible to cross ten light years of KSP space using sublight engines. All the same, I would really prefer to be able to choose my own warp drive mods. I believe that you should highly recommend them, but I really dont want to have to have a particular warp drive mod. And if that mod ever dies, that will be a large problem for TBG. Its sad if the wormholes wont be in. I will poke around to see if anyone can help with that. But the solution is not dependency on a parts mod. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 Just now, Mycroft said: All the same, I would really prefer to be able to choose my own warp drive mods. I believe that you should highly recommend them, but I really dont want to have to have a particular warp drive mod. And if that mod ever dies, that will be a large problem for TBG. Its sad if the wormholes wont be in. I will poke around to see if anyone can help with that. But the solution is not dependency on a parts mod. It will be a big problem for TBG without a custom warp drive. No standard warp mod is EVEN equipped for the distances of TBG. None of them. They are all too slow and run out of fuel too fast. In order for the player to get anywhere. They will need a custom warp part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 1 minute ago, daniel l. said: It will be a big problem for TBG without a custom warp drive. No standard warp mod is EVEN equipped for the distances of TBG. None of them. They are all too slow and run out of fuel too fast. In order for the player to get anywhere. They will need a custom warp part. In that case, with all due respect, I would urge a separate, complimentary mod that you can install with TBG. I dont want to need to be dependent on a parts mod for TBG. There is a reason for the very little amount of crossover between planet and parts packs. They don't combine well. Please trust me on this. Honestly the best solution at this point IMHO is the one I suggested above, that of a separate mod that maybe comes as part of the download but is a separate gamedata subfolder. I want to be able to have the ability to install TBG without adding any extra parts. Believe you me, I completely get why you want to do this. I am well aware that almost all warp mods are not ideal for the sheer scale of this mod. But I am also aware that it is good to be as independent as possible, and I am aware that the distinction between part and planet packs is there for a reason. I do not think this is a wise course of action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, Mycroft said: that of a separate mod that maybe comes as part of the download but is a separate gamedata subfolder. Those are my plans. Don't worry. Besides. It would only be one HUGE part that would have two modes. Low speed, And high speed. Low is for interplanetary. High is for interstellar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JadeOfMaar Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 @Mycroft I'm still against the idea of bundling a part in a planet mod. However I would accept that it's not 'directly' bundled. I'm okay with it being in an Optionals folder within the package. Also, we're not going to be forcing players to use TBG's warp drive. In the end the player will either never notice it, do decide to use it, or find/make an alternative for whatever reason. So no worries. @daniel l. knows his stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mycroft Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 1 minute ago, JadeOfMaar said: @Mycroft I'm still against the idea of bundling a part in a planet mod. However I would accept that it's not 'directly' bundled. I'm okay with it being in an Optionals folder within the package. Also, we're not going to be forcing players to use TBG's warp drive. In the end the player will either never notice it, do decide to use it, or find/make an alternative for whatever reason. So no worries. @daniel l. knows his stuff. Yes it was my impression that @daniel l. was going to bundle it in with the main mod. I am glad to hear he is not planning to do so. I have nothing against the part, just the iea of bundling it, as I stated above. Thanks for the clarification! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 Of note is that i will be releasing version 0.2.5.1 tomorrow and it will have several improvements. not many as it is a simple patch for 0.2.5 but it will add a few things. Such as... Spoiler Fooled ya didn't i? I intend to keep it a surprise for some convoluted reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 I have to ask guys. How is the latest TBG update working for you? I want to know how functional it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 21, 2017 Author Share Posted January 21, 2017 Okay then... No replies. Anyway. Version 0.2.5.1 will be released very soon. Also of note: Version 0.3 will add rare planets. And i intend for 0.3.5 to rework standard planets to make them entirely procedural. But before 0.3 i intend to work on 0.2.6 Can you guess what that will bring? More galaxy configuration settings to the algorithm, Such as size, Age, Planet frequency, Density, And more. Also in 0.2.7 i hope to add a new system that groups stars close together in clusters. Kind of like the cluster galaxy mode only somewhat less complex, This will coincide with a rework of the stellar naming system as suggested by @seanth Also in 0.2.8 i plan to diversify stars of individual classes. So some red dwarfs may be more orange or purple then others. As for 0.2.9 i really haven't decided yet. I may even just skip it... but then again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planetace Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 5 hours ago, daniel l. said: Okay then... No replies. Anyway. Version 0.2.5.1 will be released very soon. Also of note: Version 0.3 will add rare planets. And i intend for 0.3.5 to rework standard planets to make them entirely procedural. But before 0.3 i intend to work on 0.2.6 Can you guess what that will bring? More galaxy configuration settings to the algorithm, Such as size, Age, Planet frequency, Density, And more. Also in 0.2.7 i hope to add a new system that groups stars close together in clusters. Kind of like the cluster galaxy mode only somewhat less complex, This will coincide with a rework of the stellar naming system as suggested by @seanth Also in 0.2.8 i plan to diversify stars of individual classes. So some red dwarfs may be more orange or purple then others. As for 0.2.9 i really haven't decided yet. I may even just skip it... but then again... MOAR PLANETS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 21, 2017 Author Share Posted January 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Galacticvoyager said: MOAR PLANETS! They shall be coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planetace Posted January 21, 2017 Share Posted January 21, 2017 4 minutes ago, daniel l. said: They shall be coming. THY KRAKEN WILL BE PLEASED WITH MORE SACRIFICIAL WORLDS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniel l. Posted January 21, 2017 Author Share Posted January 21, 2017 8 minutes ago, Galacticvoyager said: THY KRAKEN WILL BE PLEASED WITH MORE SACRIFICIAL WORLDS! I can imagine he will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starslinger999 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 Anyone having the problem where i hear the KSP music and all is see is a black screen and the loading icon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanth Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 2 minutes ago, Starslinger999 said: Anyone having the problem where i hear the KSP music and all is see is a black screen and the loading icon? Can you give a screenshot? There is a known bug with Kopernicus involving the KSC not appearing after you start a game, but that doesn't sound like what you're describing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starslinger999 Posted January 22, 2017 Share Posted January 22, 2017 (edited) On 1/22/2017 at 3:54 PM, seanth said: Can you give a screenshot? There is a known bug with Kopernicus involving the KSC not appearing after you start a game, but that doesn't sound like what you're describing I started up ksp again to take a pic of the glitch, But the main menu loaded this time and i started up Before it just had the loading thing didn't show the menu screen Edited February 12, 2017 by Starslinger999 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts