Mikenike Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 33 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: KSP 3 for the sake of KSP 3. Does KSP 3 have a reason to be considered at this time? Yes, considering that COD 2022 is already being leaked, then always. COD 2021's stuff hasn't been announced yet and we are getting rumors of a BO2 reboot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bej Kerman Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Mikenike said: 3 hours ago, Bej Kerman said: KSP 3 for the sake of KSP 3. Does KSP 3 have a reason to be considered at this time? Yes, considering that COD 2022 is already being leaked, then always. COD 2021's stuff hasn't been announced yet and we are getting rumors of a BO2 reboot. I beg your pardon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikenike Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 41 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: I beg your pardon? We are potentially getting the second best selling Call Of Duty game in 2022 as a reboot/redone, either how they have done the new MW/BOCW Series, or as a complete redo, like COD4 MW/MW2. We don't know just yet. So, yes, KSP 3 must be a considered option, at all times, from here on out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bej Kerman Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 7 minutes ago, Mikenike said: 52 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: I beg your pardon? We are potentially getting the second best selling Call Of Duty game in 2022 as a reboot/redone, either how they have done the new MW/BOCW Series, or as a complete redo, like COD4 MW/MW2. We don't know just yet. So, yes, KSP 3 must be a considered option, at all times, from here on out. What's COD got to do with anything other than salty 12 year olds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikenike Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 5 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: What's COD got to do with anything other than salty 12 year olds? Im just saying it always has got to be considered. We could get KSP3 before we get KSP2. Its really unlikely, but it could happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bej Kerman Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, Mikenike said: 9 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: What's COD got to do with anything other than salty 12 year olds? Im just saying it always has got to be considered. We could get KSP3 before we get KSP2. Its really unlikely, but it could happen We don't need a KSP 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikenike Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just now, Bej Kerman said: We don't need a KSP 3. We always do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kernel Kraken Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 32 minutes ago, Bej Kerman said: What's COD got to do with anything other than salty 12 year olds? Hey! There's salty 13 year olds too, don't discredit Call of Duty too much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/21/2021 at 3:39 PM, Dr. Kerbal said: We would not want a legendary mainsail. ... You say that, but what if it was purple? Then wouldn't you want to buy it? For just a few dollars more you can get the Founder's Edition Gold Camo Reliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ash73 Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/21/2021 at 3:56 PM, SpaceFace545 said: <snip> FTL is about 400 years from now. I think it's important you understand... Star Trek isn't real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceFace545 Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 4 minutes ago, Bedazzled said: I think it's important you understand... Star Trek isn't real. yeah but 100 years ago we thought human flight was impossible and spaceflight was a fever dream. Who knows how physics and our technology will change over the next hundred years. Plus all of our physics were made by dead people who could barely dream of what we do today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meecrob Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 But 118+ years ago (because clearly we knew how to fly in 1921), we could look up and see birds flying around, so we knew it was a matter of research and development of observable phenomena. We do not observe matter moving superluminally. You are, in essence, trying to get us to prove a negative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shdwlrd Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 3 hours ago, Bedazzled said: I think it's important you understand... Star Trek isn't real. Star Trek is fiction and has it share of handwavium, but a lot of the technology is based on real life theories. You can't dismiss all technologies on Star Trek as handwavium. The time lines for technology is up to speculation, fusion reactors has been "within the next decade" for the past 50 years. But personal computing devices which was said to never happen, are everywhere now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerikBalm Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 11 hours ago, shdwlrd said: But personal computing devices which was said to never happen, are everywhere now. Said by whom? Are you referring to this BS? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ken-olsen/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcwaffles2003 Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 23 hours ago, Mikenike said: Im just saying it always has got to be considered. We could get KSP3 before we get KSP2. Its really unlikely, but it could happen You do realize that the different series of COD are developed by different developers right? Modern warfare is developed by Infinity ward and Ghosts is developed Treyarch for instance. They are different series made by different studios. Not to mention KSP 3 is at nearest a decade away and we have no clue what the full scope of KSP 2 is whereas CoD is the same game over and over just reskinned with a continued story. So speculation on KSP 3 seems a bit pointless, and no, there is 0 chance KSP 3 comes out b4 KSP 2, that is blatantly rediculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bej Kerman Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 21 hours ago, Meecrob said: But 118+ years ago (because clearly we knew how to fly in 1921), we could look up and see birds flying around, so we knew it was a matter of research and development of observable phenomena. We do not observe matter moving superluminally. You are, in essence, trying to get us to prove a negative. We could not observe black holes in the early 20th century, but Einstein still predicted them - as much as he didn't believe they could exist. In essence, you're a guy in the 1920s arguing that black holes can't exist, and also arguing we don't see infinitesimally sized infinitely dense objects in nature therefore they can't exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.1bc14d6e4f63faaaba4640415621b239.jpeg)
Recommended Posts