What would you want in the next update (0.90)?

[foxkill2342]

Fix the decoupler bugs.

[MoreUmpf]

Fix the decoupler bugs.

If you mean the decoubler bug of the 64-bit version, it has been fixed as of 0.24.1:

* Fixed an issue with some decoupler modules failing to apply ejection forces when activated.

@OP: Better graphics. When I look at all the other games that are using the Unity engine, most of them have really good graphics even compared to modern standarts, whereas KSP has some really outdated graphics.

Edited November 1, 2014 by MoreUmpf

[tater]

Memory management. I watch my memory use climbs towards 3GB (out of 12 available) because I know it will blow up at 3. That's with ATM running, lol.

[haltux]

If you mean the decoubler bug of the 64-bit version, it has been fixed as of 0.24.1:

Lateral decoupling without separatron during ascending phase still (more or less randomly) destroy the rocket, because the bottom of separated parts collide.This appeared with 0.24 and is still not resolved.

[TicTacToe!]

I think what we've already seen presented is fantastic, biomes everywhere, and the fineprint integration and contracts boost is fab.

I'd love a new planet that's just something different though. A planet with a ludicrously high rotation speed like Inaccessible from Planet Factory would be something great, but I'm not fussed really, just something really exotic and unique that we've yet to see. It would be an awesome Christmas present.

[Joonatan1998]

Some kind of life support system would be nice, even if it would not be enabled on easier difficulties.

[Krupski]

Lateral decoupling without separatron during ascending phase still (more or less randomly) destroy the rocket, because the bottom of separated parts collide.This appeared with 0.24 and is still not resolved.

I always use properly placed Sepratrons to pull away things like an expended SRB from the launch vehicle. Due to the limited range that a part can snap onto another part, merely using a decoupler will almost always result in a "push" well below the center of mass, causing the top of the SRB to swing inward and hit the launch vehicle.

Real boosters always use small solid rockets to push an SRB away properly.

[LethalDose]

Also, DIFFERENT propellant combinations with realistic performance specs would be nice.

Since we're getting *some* kind of resource collection/refueling mechanism at some point in the future, I would like to see different engines require specific LF types, specifically RP1, Methane, and LH2. They would all burn with LOx for simplicity (and that's what they do IRL anyway). The purpose of the different fuels would be off-world availability:

• RP1 would only be available on Kerbin
  
• Methane could be generated from CO2 rich atmospheres (Duna & Eve) + H2O
  
• LH2 could be generated from H2O alone
  

RP1 and Methane would have good energy density, while LH2 would be low density, but easy to generate.

Big lifter stage engines (T30's, 45's, Mainsails, etc.) and jets could burn RP1, More advances engines (24-77s, LFBs, engine clusters) could burn methane, and dedicated upper stage engines (LV909s, poodles, 48-7S) would use LH2. Oh yeah, and nukes should just use freaking LH2!!!!! ISPs would be changed so the engines perform in basically the exact same as they do currently.

Tanks would be tweakable to set which fuel mixtures to use (pre-set, appropriate fuel:ox ratios), so new models wouldn't be needed.

It's not that complex, and players could be given the option to use "simple LF resource" at the start of any game.

This would also mesh nicely with a life-support system, but... /sigh dare to dream.

[Eld0r]

1. windows client side IPv6 support!

- DMP can use it, but it is not supported in windows KSP clients

- linux and mac clients are already able to use ipv6

2. faster loading while switching between buildings / map view

- it's not that I don't like the small solar system animation, but sometimes it takes a bit to much time...

3. Objects "on-rail" shouldn't just dissappear while reentry

- like the space shuttle booster rokets beside the main tank

- so before deleting, check for the following:

-- a actiongroup for automatic reentry and return

-- or just check for unused parachutes and open them

- after checking that, this object - of course - needs a physical simulation!

[temporalExile]

These bad boys

[SpaceXray]

Gas giant 2 please!!!!

[temporalExile]

Gas giant 2 please!!!!

"Sorry to play Scrooge here, but I wouldn't count on [Gas planet 2]"

Sorry to burst your bubble...

Source is here

[Mitchz95]

The game will not be complete in my eyes until a Saturn analogue is included in the stock game.

The DangIt mod should be stock too, but optional through the difficulty options.

(2) Realistic engine exhaust plumes. A hydrogen/oxygen engine doesn't produce a narrow orange plume in a vacuum. Maybe something like this:

(click pic for full res)

http://www.gunsnet.net/photopost/data/500/medium/s2.png

...or orange/white for lox/RP1... but please no "blowtorches" in a vacuum!

What mod did you use to get those effects?

Edited November 4, 2014 by Mitchz95

[HafCoJoe]

The engines and decouplers from Stock Part Revamp as well as IVAs for all capsules. Oh and also Hugo's mk3 cockpit and the rest of the new mk3 line. Kappa

[waterlubber]

I would LOVE if these two parts were added/modified:

-Radial Separators (Great for radially attaching probes and rovers without the unbalancing decoupler)

-Oscar B- NEEDS to be radially attachable like the rest of the tanks, you won't believe how much this bugs me.

Also, I'd like a small buff on it's fuel capacity.

[IvanTehFennec]

How about a working game, with half the features they said they'd have actually in the game. Instead, they're probably just going to add the flavor-of-the-month mod again, and call it a day.

[Alien1099]

Cargo bays for stock rocket sizes.

[.DJFrostbite]

So I guess squad says they don't want to include life support in the game oh well.. More EVA immersion IVA more than one mining resource when they implement and Gas giant 2 if they find time.

[Merlin]

Mech Jeb compatibility & 64 bit as well. essential

[Merlin]

More space station type modules not just one science mod.

[SgìobairOg]

I'd like to be able to group my craft within groups in the normal categories. For example, I have 32 GNSS Satellites orbiting, it'd help me to reduce clutter if I could go to the tracking station highlight satellites and see "GNSS Cluster" with an option to expand rather than having to scroll past 32 individual satellites to get to my others.

[theend3r]

I'd like to be able to group my craft within groups in the normal categories. For example, I have 32 GNSS Satellites orbiting, it'd help me to reduce clutter if I could go to the tracking station highlight satellites and see "GNSS Cluster" with an option to expand rather than having to scroll past 32 individual satellites to get to my others.

Definitely this! That would alse get rid of all those flags. Great idea.

[MasterSounis]

@IvanTehFennec: That's kind of what happens when you play a game in alpha. It's half baked only because it hasn't been in the oven long enough.

Edited November 5, 2014 by MasterSounis
format error

[CaptRobau]

Definitely this! That would alse get rid of all those flags. Great idea.

Flags are something you can already filter in the map view.

[Deadpangod3]

the game will not be complete until it is beautiful as universally possible, i mean, to the point where if you look up the word "beautiful" in the dictionary, there is a picture of KSP sitting there, then, the game may be complete.