SOXBLOX Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 DARPA is using drones loaded with what appears to be the high tech equivalent of Silly String to foul the rotors of enemy drones. Here. Might help put an end to all those drones which have been flying (unauthorized) over nuclear power facilities here in the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 30 minutes ago, SOXBLOX said: DARPA is using drones loaded with what appears to be the high tech equivalent of Silly String to foul the rotors of enemy drones. Here. Might help put an end to all those drones which have been flying (unauthorized) over nuclear power facilities here in the US. I want some - then I can be 'spider man, spider man, every body's fav-o-rit spiider man, spinning webs? Any size!' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 Can they make a bigger one? Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Fluffy Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 1 hour ago, SOXBLOX said: DARPA is using drones loaded with what appears to be the high tech equivalent of Silly String to foul the rotors of enemy drones. Here. Might help put an end to all those drones which have been flying (unauthorized) over nuclear power facilities here in the US. I want high tech silly string Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 Many silly strings make a big clever thread for a skylift. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrandedonEarth Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 (edited) 22 hours ago, SunlitZelkova said: What is the distance you would need to land away from the base and other landers to avoid causing damage? For the purposes of this question, in a regular LM. As others pointed out, nowhere in Earth’s SOI is safe from plume-accelerated regolith. Berms would be required to contain the ejecta from a conventional LM/Blue Moon-style lander. Starship sidesteps this issue with canted thrusters above the main tanks, giving the plume room to expand and its pressure to drop to safer levels before hitting the ‘lith. E: Or a prepared, dust-free surface... Edited June 9, 2021 by StrandedonEarth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacescifi Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 2 hours ago, StrandedonEarth said: As others pointed out, nowhere in Earth’s SOI is safe from plume-accelerated regolith. Berns would be required to contain the ejecta from a convention LM/Blue Moon-style lander. Starship sidesteps this issue with canted thrusters above the main tanks, giving the plume room to expand and its pressure to drop to safer levels before hitting the ‘lith. Uh huh. Looks like the rocket shape upright is the only IRL practical one. Sadly saucer ships, despite looking awesome, are so close to the ground that they are moon ejecta monsters waiting for their moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 44 minutes ago, Spacescifi said: Sadly saucer ships, despite looking awesome, are so close to the ground that they are moon ejecta monsters waiting for their moment. Saucers do not use any form of propulsion that would cause dramatic ejecta. Sheesh - it's like you are completely unaware of the entire field of Science Fiction or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 The video picture makrs mr now to have a think. If Tesla sees an elephant, syanding across the road, will it try to slide beneath? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegarrison Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacescifi Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 1 hour ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said: Saucers do not use any form of propulsion that would cause dramatic ejecta. Sheesh - it's like you are completely unaware of the entire field of Science Fiction or something. I was speaking of IRL rocket powered saucers....not the cheaty scifi kind. 1 hour ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. At first I thought you meant Black Lives Matter....and I had to suppress laughter. But for what it's worth both BLM's are equally powerless here unless one of their member's is wearing a red cape. What you're asking COULD in theory be done with a lot of time and cataclysmic level technology....but all of which would take a lot longer than any current popular human organization will likely exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 3 hours ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. Proud Moments in American History Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOXBLOX Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 3 hours ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. Excuse me while I throw up... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Fluffy Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 3 hours ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. That is so dumb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSchmuckatelli Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 OK - well, if BLM can't do it, should we worry about BLM doing it? Tune in to Fox News to find out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Fluffy Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 4 hours ago, JoeSchmuckatelli said: Saucers do not use any form of propulsion that would cause dramatic ejecta. Sheesh - it's like you are completely unaware of the entire field of Science Fiction or something. That kid lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikegarrison Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) I would have laughed so hard if she had replied, "I'm sorry sir, but the orbits are on rails. We would have to reload the solar system using Kopernicus." Edited June 10, 2021 by mikegarrison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spacescifi Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) 32 minutes ago, SOXBLOX said: Excuse me while I throw up... A better question is....what would you say in response if you were the expert? Remember forum rules in your response. I would say: "Do you listen to coast 2 coast AM on the radio much? Does illuminati or ancient aliens mean anything to you? Because if so, this is the wrong forum for you. Next question please!" Edited June 10, 2021 by Spacescifi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 5 hours ago, mikegarrison said: Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Don't they know the answer themselves? Spoiler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shpaget Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 7 hours ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” For those not from the US, in this context "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management. Was the answer that was eventually given any form of "Are you dim or halfwit?"? This is on par with that one gov oficial talking about islands tipping over due to increase in population, or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AHHans Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) 9 hours ago, mikegarrison said: A US Representative today asked an expert testifying in committee, "Is there anything that the National Forest Service or BLM can do to change the course of the moon’s orbit or the Earth’s orbit around the sun? Obviously that would have profound effects on our climate.” what! That actually happened, and it apparently wasn't method acting or a joke : (It starts at 1:18.50, direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkSs7BHScnU&t=4730s ) And the answer was: Quote I would have to follow up with you on that one. I've got nothing to say.... Edited June 10, 2021 by AHHans The forum removed the timestamp, so I addded it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Also they can grow Eywa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomf Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 The person responding played it well "I'm not going to call you an idiot in this public meeting, instead when I have thought of a polite way to explain it I will email the explanation to you" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnemoe Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 9 hours ago, Spacescifi said: Uh huh. Looks like the rocket shape upright is the only IRL practical one. Sadly saucer ships, despite looking awesome, are so close to the ground that they are moon ejecta monsters waiting for their moment. Both the other two landers who competed with moonship and the Apollo lunar lander had engines placed low. Granted national team and Apollo used the landing stage as an launch platform getting up. Problem with starship is that its so heavy and using powerful engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbiloid Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Heavy engines on top add additional intrigue to the vertically standing Starship CoM position. Also it's nice to blow hot gas around the cryogenic fuel tanks below. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.