Jimbodiah

Maybe if KSP2 dies we can get some more updates for KSP1. Here's hoping....

You used to have alpha/beta testing with a select player group, then when the game was about to be released you would get early access with some overpriced game-pass type of deals. People have since been brainwashed to believe a pre-alpha piece of software is now "early access" with the over-the-top pricetag warranted. People have too much money to burn and allow studios to get away with this behavior, hell, they even reward it. I'll test software at work and get paid for it, instead of handing them money and free time to do it for them.

From what I saw in the youtube videos showing the time line, about 90% of the functionality from KSP1 is still in the distant future. KSP2 has no business being released and an early-access game in this state, let alone at AAA prices. All the features they have been loading the hype-train with are not even in the game yet, after what, almost 2 years of delay? What have they been doing in all that time? This early-access is going to bite them in the behind. Just imagine being totally new to KSP, spending $50 expecting a AAA game that is almost done and then getting a buggy game with so many missing features that it will have even Noman's Sky laughing and pointing its finger. I swear the price will have most people getting peepeed just out of principle. $20 and I think everyone would get it and not moan about the state of it. Asking full ticket price for something that seems to have finished compiling without errors for the first time ever and expecting people to pay for the honor of testing your vaporware? MBAs are poison. And I see they still herald the weak joints as an actual game feature. smh. I'll check the progress in about 2 years from now or if it goes on 60% sale.

I've seen that arch a whiiiiile back, but now it is cracked and showing something inside.

Any chance of regular links? I only do manual installs.

Thanks for taking the time though!

thank you!

https://tenor.com/search/mr-bean-magic-gifs Yeah, wasn't sure why the link was made to USI. Are similar issues know to LS mods?

will do, thank you

To continue on from the general thread.... about different kerbals popping into my craft. Not sure how this is related to USI LS, as it's not running out of supplies. The log posted earlier shows 3 kerbals in my ship but I had no one on board when launching (and all parts that can hold kerbals are empty after checking the "transfer crew" option). When I had normal crew and they were replaced by tourists, I still had LS supplies on board. link to log: http://dasher.nl/kerbal/log.zip

That is a link to this thread There is no link as it seems to not be finished yet. I see 0.6.1 on github. Looking forward to see the new release. I spotted 64K textures (eve?)

Has anyone made a SystemHeat patch for habtech2?

I swore I would never play without SSTUU but there are too many bugs now as its not been updated since 1.8-ish I think. I just removed it and am making fuel switches for NearFuture fuels in BDB and Cryo tanks. I'm just using regular old monoprop for rcs now. I do miss the tank customization of sstu though, just fit it out in the hangar before you launch, add whatever resources you need in one tank. I made a ton of patches for SSTU to make it compatible with every mod I used. Now doing the same for BDB Yeah, I found those in Cryotanks iirc I just thought it was a deprecated part or something

I have had it installed but don't see anything different on surfaces, they look vanilla-RSS to me. So I was one step short of the ultra setting. Working now. Noobs gonna noob. Wanted to upload a photo, but forum says to liquid off.

Yep, USI lifesupport. Not run into issues with supplies being gone, just normal drain. I'll see if I can can get some more tourist missions and reproduce it for a logfile. see link for logs

Haven't seen this question in the last 5 pages... so.... Anyone have this working on RSS?

Mind blown. You learn something new every day.

Loving these mods more and more

Trying to make a patch to add some B9 tanktypes to existing mods.... The part will have this module, plus could have other modules besides the fuelSwitch version. MODULE { name = ModuleB9PartSwitch moduleID = fuelSwitch switcherDescription = Fuel switcherDescriptionPlural = Fuels Just trying to see if I can wrap my head around the syntax to first check for that module and secondly to alter it... Would this be the correct condition to only alter parts with that fuelSwitch module type? @PART[...]:HAS[@MODULE[ModuleB9PartSwitch]&moduleID[fuelSwitch]]:NEEDS[B9PartSwitch&...]:AFTER[...] and would this change that particular moduleID @MODULE[ModuleB9PartSwitch]:HAS[~modulelID[fuelSwitch]] { // do my stuff } Any advice would be most welcome.

I notice in the patches in the BDB folders, there is a reference to both Bluedog_DB and Bluedog_DB_1 (B9 patches). Could someone explain how that works?

Trying to add some NearFuture fuels to the partswitch in CryoEngines. 1.) I've made new tank type definitions 2.) Added them as subtypes to the cryotanks patch that already does all their own fuels Game starts up fine, no fatal error message, but also no extra fuel types in the tanks. Am I missing a step somewhere, like the tank type colors etc? nvm, stock tanks all take the patch, just bdb tanks arenot taking the config somewhere... I know where to look now.

Yeah, so I thought I was crazy, but I launch a ship with a set of pilot/scientists and after a time warp they magically turned into tourists from missions. Anyone seen this behavior and know what is causing it? Running 1.12.3 with 30+ mods like RSS/BDB/NF/USI/Konstructs.

Will the Fueltank module accept MM patches to add NF Propulsion fuels to say the tanks from CryoTanks? i.e. TANK { name = Lithium amount = 0.0 maxAmount = 0.0 }

meep meep

I'll check on those, haven't gone near any poles yet. Do you happen to know if there are any higher res versions of the rss textures out there? I have 16K but I have seen a 64K version in an older release iirc.