Poodmund

The Real Plume Stock Configs file is now showing up in CKAN but for me I still can't install Real Plumes because of a greyed out dependency being RealFuels-Engine-Configs (Virtual). Any ideas?

I can't seem to install Real Plumes as I don't have other mods installed in the Relationships...? I don't have RO, AJE, FAR, Real Fuels or Real Heat installed, is this what is not allowing my to install Real Plumes? Dependency issue?

Yeah I found the same thing a while back.

Yeah if you open up the EVE menu you can change the intensity, rotation speed, altitude etc. of that effect to your liking. Nothing to do with OPM though.

Well in the current release of EVE the hot-key is Alt+N; in Linux being Alt+Right-Shift+N. I thought in the new dev version it was changed to E as suggested above. Maybe someone can shed further light on this.

Right-Shift + Alt + E is what you're looking for.

Ferram would it not be prudent to put a list/procedure of exact requirements for reporting bugs to yourself into the OP. I know you have done it before in other posts but to include it in the OP, you and others could just direct people to it to save you repeating yourself at length over and over.

Thank you for the quick response. Liking the update too, can make nice little mini-probes.

Do these interact with Interstellar's 'Waste Heat' resource?

Plugin creators give you the canvas and oils, you create the art. Take you time, man... it's ready when its ready. It's not like the current release of KSPRC doesn't work on 1.0.2 anyway with a little fiddling.

To get around this I currently have also installed MI's Modular Fuel Tank Expansion but despite being a very good mod in its own right, it bloats the footprint of the parts catalog somewhat.

I have just realised that there is an incompatibility with Porkjet's Stock Fuel Switch Patch - http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/121321-Stock-Fuel-Switch When using the above patch both the Oscar-D and Oscar-E, 0.625 fuel tanks revert to the 18 Liquid Fuel and 22 Oxidiser resource amounts that the stock Oscar-B tank has. I am pretty sure that the patch is applied to the Oscar-B values for all 3 tanks due to the .cfg for the D & E tanks pulling from the B .cfg. Using the above patch isn't very desirable anyway as its a bit of a dirty blanket fix for parts that having had been given Interstellar Fuel Switch compatibility. Therefore, for the next release, would the tanks be able to have the Interstellar Fuel Switch plugin added to them so that we can choose what kind of fuel we would like to have in the tanks? Now with the Nuclear rocket-motors running on only Liquid Fuel it would be preferable to do so as to not waste tank space but emptying Oxidiser but instead utilising all the space with Liquid Fuel etc. Interstellar Fuel Switch - http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/117932

Keep up the good work, Proot. You are doing God's work and I bet I can speak on behalf of everyone when I say we appreciate the effort you and others are going to to make KSP look pretty amazing. 'Soon' is soon enough.

ModuleManager 2.5.6 is being bundled with the latest release and it is no longer current. MM 2.6.5 is the latest version as of this time of posting. Is it worth repackaging the latest Trajectories release with the latest version of MM?

Thank you. For some reason my 'Explore Body' contracts were getting rejected and I couldn't see why so I ended up downloading the mod again and overwriting the settings.cfg to get back to Default behavior. Just thought it would be one of those 'Quality of Life" additions as its not a bug or game breaking.

Would it be possible to include in the GUI a button to revert all parameters set to Default?

These are the same people that post, for example, in the B9 or KW thread asking when is a v1.0 compatible version going to get released for the 3rd time on that thread page. It must be infuriating but realistically its not going to go away.

Thank you for being so quick on the draw.

I have had an issue with the mesh on the Cupola where anything radially attached to the sides looked as though it was inside the model by a fraction, for example, radial parachutes attached would barely by poking out the edge of the can. Is anyone else experiencing this?

The mod creator is on the job. With some luck we may hear of any plans soon.

Every time CKAN gets mentioned in this thread, Ferram is one step closer to a mental breakdown. If you want support, try the CKAN thread.

It is showing as available on CKAN now but fails to install when Firespitter is installed and vice versa due to: The following inconsistencies were found:Firespitter wishes to install GameData/Firespitter/Resources/Firespitter.cfg, but this file is registered to KerbalAircraftExpansion Installing KAX throws up this error message: Oh no! We tried to overwrite a file owned by another mod!Please try a `ckan update` and try again. If this problem re-occurs, then it maybe a packaging bug. Please report it at: https://github.com/KSP-CKAN/CKAN-meta/issues/new Please including the following information in your report: File : GameData/Firespitter/Resources/Firespitter.cfg Installing Mod : KerbalAircraftExpansion v2.4.1 Owning Mod : Firespitter CKAN Version : v1.6.13-0-g0000000 (beta) Your GameData has been returned to its original state. I've raised an issue.

This has already been brought to attention in the CKAN thread. Any further support should be available there on this issue I would assume: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/100067-The-Comprehensive-Kerbal-Archive-Network-%28CKAN%29-Package-Manager-v1-6-13-6-May-2015?p=1920862&viewfull=1#post1920862

At some point in the future, he is obviously busy and we should respect that and eagerly await an update when it comes.

Refer to Hoojiwana's post: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/116916-Comprehensive-Mod-Compatibility-List-for-KSP-1-0?p=1870220&viewfull=1#post1870220 He knows it is incompatible (to some extent) and is aware. I am sure when he has some spare time he will get round to updating the mods.