Jump to content

linuxgurugamer

Bug Hunter
  • Posts

    25,055
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by linuxgurugamer

  1. There is one more thing I'm going to try, I'll post here when I have a version to test. LGG
  2. I am considering removing the RCS from the main All Y' All mod and releasing it as a separate mod, since it seems to be causing issues when there are lots of RCS parts (and parts in general) on a vessel. I'm waiting to get a response from my previous message before doing this
  3. This shouldn't be too difficult to check to see if ProbeControlRoom is installed when doing that check, I'll take a look at it
  4. This mod does not have any knowledge of Tweakscale (TS), therefore when recovering vessels, it doesn't know anything about the change TS makes. It has to do with the way it gets the info, and would probably require a lot of work to make it able to contact either version of TS. Add on to that the headache of trying to support two different versions of TS, and it's just not going to happen anytime soon, sorry
  5. It's probably the RCS, that was a recent addition. I've made a test copy with some change trying to address this, please try it out: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/fnkt2m385pxvirhkug27k/AllYAll-0.11.21.b1.zip?rlkey=hzdbhkncr80ss1x4k72qw9wrf&dl=1 Let me know the result. If it still happens, then: I'd need a copy of your craft file I looked at your craft file, you have a lot of RCS thrusters on it For both of you, try replacing the file AllYAll.cfg with the following (or just delete the first 15 lines of the file), this will disable the RCS part of the mod. Let me know how it goes. Also, I don't have time to install dozens of mods. Please try making the vessels using only stock parts, or at least as few other mods as possible.
  6. New release, 0.0.3.13: Fixed parts which had the following modules also getting a volume of -1: ModuleGroundCommsPart ModuleGroundExpControl ModuleGroundExperiment ModuleGroundSciencePart
  7. It's been fixed. FYI: It had nothing to do with the KSP Community Fixes. It had to do with parts having ModuleGroundPart modules only, there was a problem in a cfg file which I missed when I did the previous update
  8. New release, 0.0.3.12 Fixed parts which had ModuleGroundPart also getting a volume of -1
  9. Ok, I need more info. For example, a list of installed mods, and which part exactly are having the problem. Also, the ModuleManager.ConfigCache is needed for this as well And the partVolumes-v4.cfg file is needed as well PV doesn't do anything other than generate the file. If it does, you need to restart the game to have the changes applied correctly.
  10. How are you installing it? Best and recommend way is with CKAN No, but feel free to write one and submit it for inclusion
  11. Yes, of course. Contact me on Discord to discuss
  12. You would need to edit the part (or use a MM script) to add the part modules. Look at some of the parts in the mod to see examples of the syntax andsetttings
  13. Probably not, but you need to contact the FreeIVA mod author I don't see any reason why not
  14. No, those are being bypassed BECAUSE they have the ModuleInventoryPart. It's internal to KSP New release, 0.0.3.11 Added blacklistModDir to blacklist complete mod dir Added UmbraSpace to the blacklistModDir as all of it's parts were coming up with a wrong volume, due to the way the parts were made Added check for ModuleGroundPart Thanks to github user @rodb88 for pointing out that ModuleGroundPart wasn't being checked for
  15. All of you who have had recent problems, you need to provide log files (Player.log) and the craft file, otherwise I can't do anything @Fizzlebop Smith @SyrusDrake @newvegasmatt LGG
  16. I would have to look, but it might be related to the fact that when you are in the KSC view, you aren't focused on the vessel. And it's probably only checking the focused vessel when recovering
  17. Contact the Kerbalism people, they take care of things like that for Kerbalism i'm still here, if you could put together a list of what's wrong and get it to me via PM, it would be useful for when I can look at this. I see that there are a number of issues above, most of which are probably simple fixes LGG
×
×
  • Create New...