linuxgurugamer

Both

Ok,thanks Did you check the setting to make sure it was enabled?

Details in this case means a reproducable series of steps to reproduce the problem

No one is saying that permission is required or needed. What @Wyzard said was: Again, asking permission is not required or needed. However, it is courteous to ask. The courtesy does multiple things: Lets the original author know that a fork is being contemplated Allows the new person to find out if the software is still being worked on Gives the original author a good feeling that somebody cares enough to contact him I know that there are some people out there who feel that there is no need to be courteous. They feel that if the license allows, they can do anything they want. Legally, they are correct. Morally, it's a grey area. And courtesy is the oil that lets society continue to work.

Can you do it as a PR on github? If not, then an issue would work. Thanks

Whatever you can and are willing to provide. Dropbox is fine. Thanks

Actually, the Falcon 9 uses 3 engines for landing

I believe that is to commerate the first moon landing by Apollo 11

If you are running Editor Extensions, you will need to disable the ReRoot function in the EEX settings in order for the reroot to be able to work ona ghosted assembly

That is correct, but it is being worked on

They do. What about from the VAB? And can you provide a bit more detail?

You are allowed to ask. and, the answer is, not by myself. It would be nice if someone did and provided me with the IVA, although moving forward it should be done using MAS, the replacement for RPM

Thats why it is a beta. It hasnt been uploaded anywhere else yet. i am aware of thr link, will be fixed in the final release. I am most interested in people using the settings page, feedback on that and to make sure it still works properly. Thanks

I wasn’t thinking of that at all. It is definitely something to think about. If you were to provide a complete update, including the atmospheric and velocity curves, I would definitely consider it, most likely as an upgrade

Thanks, I'll fix that before the next release

New release, 0.1.11.1: Fixed the TexturesUnlimited patch Thanks to forum user @Wyzard: Fixed internal models for the RCS modules, RCS now looks and works correctly

Ummm, isn't that what I suggested here:

Done, will be there on my next commit Thanks for the suggestion

It's done

You want B9 Part Switch to depend on this? or this to depend on B9? Never mind, I just read the OP

See this:

I have a beta release, I'd appreciate some people trying it out: Changed: Changed license to MIT Moved all settings into stock settings page, both to reduce code and to have the settings persist on a per-save basis Note: Existing settings are not migrated https://jenkins.spacetux.net/job/M-S/job/StageRecovery/7/artifact/StageRecovery-1.9.0.1.zip

That changes the engine dramatically. Not all jet engines have afterburners. I'm not sure about adding this to the mod at this time

Thank you. I will be moving that whole window into the settings page, which will simplify the code since I'll be able to remove two files devoted to the settings Should be out by Sunday.

I would consider this a bug, not a feature. And I do fix bugs. I’ll take a look at it, will probably move that into the stock settings, which are applied on a per-save basis