Jump to content

jrodriguez

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,114

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by jrodriguez

  1. jrodriguez
    Thanks @ExtremeTrader for releasing a new compatible version. It is never easy to take over a complex mod and recompile shaders, etc. Do you plan to create a new thread for the mod?
  2. jrodriguez
    I'd say yes. It might be possible that depending on the resolution your 1050ti will struggle to provide a decent FPS. If you try to play at 4k with scatterer and RSSVE your GPU will suffer. Regardless of your setup, you will experience bottlenecks due to the very nature of KSP/Unity. Depending on the number of part, the GPU or the CPU will bottleneck the system . A low part number vessel will stress the GPU, but as soon as you go over X00 parts the CPU will bottleneck the system. To have more cores will not help much because currently Unity is not using more than 2 cores I think. So faster cores will provide more FPS than a CPU with more cores if the are running at a lower speed.
  3. jrodriguez
    Thanks @Papa_Joe
  4. jrodriguez
    Are you using the lastest version of the mod? Which range are you using?
  5. jrodriguez
    Yes, I recommend to read this: https://github.com/PapaJoesSoup/BDArmory/wiki/2.1-Building-your-first-Modular-Missile
  6. jrodriguez
    Then I suspect that you didn't set the stages correctly using the Custom Actions Groups from 1-5.
  7. jrodriguez
    Modular missiles are just a type of missiles so if Guard Mode is active then missiles will be fired.
  8. jrodriguez
    I have seen before that if you are hovering with the mouse over the vessel switcher/bda gui then the active vessel will not fire.
  9. jrodriguez
    Uhm I'm not sure I understood your question. If a non-active vessel is not loaded then that vessel doesn't really exist from a physics point of view. Thus, that vessel will not be able to fly or to move on the ground. The main feature that PRE provides is to allow loading all vessels within the range defined.
  10. jrodriguez
    You can survive one or two 9's missile impacts with some armor plates covering the key part of your plane using some structural parts as spacers between the part and the armor plate.
  11. jrodriguez
    uhmm that is strange. If you set the range to 1 km that would make all vessels apart from the active one to get unloaded. I have never seen that effect when there is only one vessel loaded. Maybe you can try to switch to others vessels/debris when the range is set to a low value just to ensure that there are no other vessels loaded.
  12. jrodriguez
    Hi @linuxgurugamer I have seen that behaviour in the past with some mods. If know the parts that are triggering the OnPartJointBreak event you can try to add them to this list PartIgnoreList : https://github.com/jrodrigv/DestructionEffects/blob/master/Distribution/GameData/DestructionEffects/settings.cfg
  13. jrodriguez
    the "may be hit" I think is equivalent to 10-15% angle between the firetransform and the vessel.Com or vessel root part.
  14. jrodriguez
    Actually you can change the value from the UI in-grame You don't need to touch that file. You should be fine reducing the range to 50 km.
  15. jrodriguez
    Hi Cochise I made the decision to remove it because I thought it was something not used. But to be honest if you reduce the range to 20km and click apply it would more or less "stock". Yes, you are right. If you have the default range ( I think it is 200 km?) orbits can be modified by the physics shaking. I suggest to reduce the range until you are happy with the precision.
  16. jrodriguez
    Sure, the flickering/shaking effect is the result of the lost of floating point precision with the distance There is a great article here: http://davenewson.com/posts/2013/unity-coordinates-and-scales.html You will not notice this in the stock KSP because actually vessels are getting packed/unloaded as soon as they are 2-20km (depending if the vessel is landed or orbiting) from the active vessel.
  17. jrodriguez
    That is completely expected when you have loaded vessels that are at a great distance. With the latest version of PRE you will notice a massive improvement regarding the flickering effect. I recommend to check if you are using the latest version of PRE.
  18. jrodriguez
    Reduce the range until you are happy with the flickering effect.
  19. jrodriguez
    Hi, I suggest to give it a try . I think it works perfectly fine.
  20. jrodriguez
    @The-Doctor this an example of BDArmory operating in space..
  21. jrodriguez
    I recommend to start a new game and test the basics without KK, and then add a new KK static (ensure colliders is activated).
  22. jrodriguez
    Hi all, I'm proud to announce one of the best releases of PRE so far! https://github.com/jrodrigv/PhysicsRangeExtender/releases/tag/1.7.0 = v1.7.0 Recompiled and upgraded for KSP 1.4.3 Adding option to extend terrain loading distance (thanks to @Eidahlil). So there is no need of statics anymore! Flickering fixed at 99% after applying a dynamic update of the near clip plane of the main camera. Landed range removed, only one range is needed now Thanks to the BDA team for the testing effort! During the last few days I have recorded some videos testing it
  23. jrodriguez
    The answer is yes..not 2km but 300km!
  24. jrodriguez
    Oblivion X-57 Hypersonic cruise missile - Test at 300 km distance.
  25. jrodriguez
    Hi @DirtyVenomSteam , Yes I'm working on it at the moment. The next release of PRE will improve the visual flickering and also add a heavily requested feature: that is to get the terrain loading distance extended so there is no need of static objects for landed vessels. The BDA Team is helping me with the testing and providing useful feedback
×
×
  • Create New...