Jump to content

Nightside

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,290

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Nightside

  1. Nightside
    Interesting, Unfortunately <br> didn't work in my test.
  2. Nightside
    When adding some text to a Part's description, is it possible to have the new text start on a new line?
  3. Nightside
    Following onto @4x4cheesecake's Part Name patch, you could do exactly the same thing to show the part's author in the editor description. It wouldn't give you the mod exactly, but should narrow things down significantly. //Add part AUTHOR to description @PART[*]:FINAL { @description = #$description$ <color=#7F7F7F> [$author$]</color> }
  4. Nightside
    You can go give this an upvote: https://bugs.kerbalspaceprogram.com/issues/21103
  5. Nightside
    I think that answers the question. To avoid the radiation astronauts just gotta JUMP!
  6. Nightside
    What version of Procedural Parts are you running in 1.7? I see you link to Starwaster's but I see that @Tidal Stream has multiple branches that point to various versions of KSP.
  7. Nightside
    Welcome to the forums @The Notorious Y.C.R. Yes there are 2 mods of that name that work currently. Both will require the KerbalKonstructs mod. if you have issues with installation (or better yet awesome pics of your creations to post), check out those threads.
  8. Nightside
    Hey @cakepie, is this patch still necessary?
  9. Nightside
    Suggestion: change “Liked” to “thumbed”
  10. Nightside
    I had to look one of those acronyms up. PPE: Power Propulsion Element what do we know about this thing? How will this compare with previous electric propulsion?
  11. Nightside
    I think so, but I'm not really sure, like I said, I sorta gave up on it and moved on to other projects.
  12. Nightside
    It should be possible with Kopernicus, and I actually tried (and failed) to do this myself, it’s just another 3D model. But I’ve never put the time in to figure out modeling and the Kopernicus discord channel is a meme-infested hellscape so I never got it done.
  13. Nightside
    Maybe you can remove the MODEL node but keep INTERNAL. I used to run that patch too, but maybe try it without the patch. Performance has improved quite bit in recent versions.
  14. Nightside
    Moving parts shouldn't be damaged by striking other pieces of the same vessel. If you have to bury the panel base in the SM, you can assign a hotkey to deploy the panels.
  15. Nightside
    Well it is a failure for their reusability goals. I think this was the furthest downrange recovery they have attempted, which means more travel time on the open seas, which are not known to be forgiving to the ambitions of humans. Another reason for a system that always does RTLS in my opinion.
  16. Nightside
    Cool idea. I think that would be really nice. What is the Harmony dependency you mention? I've never heard of it.
  17. Nightside
    I think there was something like this at some point, back in the days when asparagus staging was a dominant design. I can’t think of the name though.
  18. Nightside
    Wow- that went over my head, but interesting to see that you are thinking creatively about the issue. that said... why exactly would you even want a tunnel in KSP? It seems extravagantly useless.
  19. Nightside
    Make sure you installed ModuleManager, TexturesUnlimited and all other dependencies . You should be able change colors and metallic properties of most parts in the editor. if that doesn’t help see first post for issue reporting instructions.
  20. Nightside
    MechJeb can do this.
  21. Nightside
    The only one I know that just adds an Orion Capsule (& SM) is @silentvelcro‘s stylish HOYO CSM. There are several others, like reDirect and SSTU, but those will add lots more parts.
  22. Nightside
    It seems to be working fine in 1.7
  23. Nightside
    It sounds like they are still foreseeing heating issues.
  24. Nightside
    Kerbin and the rest of the system are so tiny, which means delta-V requirements will also be tiny. So, you have to decide if you are making a visual scale model, or a functional scale model. A functional scale model would be much shorter and probably pretty silly looking, just like the Kerbals themselves!. I would likely have much less powerful engines (or perhaps a lot of dead weight clipped inside), or, as someone mentioned partially empty tanks and reduced thrust engines. It can end up being a lot extra work designing something that looks right (in the real world) and flies right (in KSP).
  25. Nightside
    I've been happily playing with Restock for the last couple of days and I can definitely recommend it. It looks like RealChute Compatibility has already been addressed in a previous release of Restock, based on these release notes, although I don't currently have RealChute installed to check. As for RealPlume, it looks like you will have to wait for an update of the RealPlume mod or install a prerelease version from here (as mentioned in the Restock OP): That said, consider trying it without RealPlume, I'm a RealPlume Addict myself, but Nertea does a really good job creating plumes, so, it is worth looking at.
×
×
  • Create New...