Drakenred65

.

NOOOOOOOOooo . . . #gasps# Ok now that that is out is my system ...

Not really. Pure sandbox from the look of k things

You may want to use 1-2 stock rockets to your description as that seems to have an impact on performance.

Nothing says early access quite like suddenly needing to return the KSC to KSC. Seriously though nothing shows just how powerful the Kraken is than the fact he duplicated KSP IN ORBIT. hmm. Kraken Space Canter.

KSP In ORBIT! (CLIP from Matt Lowne showing it at 2 21.) Granted it's a way of building Rockets in orbit... Granted rescuing the entirety KSP and returning it will be one heck of a episode of Blunder Birds So now we just need to replicate this bug then we need to find the other launch locations and yeet them into space.

Based on what happen to Scott manley at the Mohole ( yes he found it ) ( he passed through the bottom and was yeeted into escape velocity at or near the singularity ) they may have had a reason to make you land

I almost suspect it may not be implemented if it's planned. However if they are doing the 8 the planet from the original KSP you may need to do it roughly in order.

For those of us not installing KSP 2 right away, what do you hope to see? Personally I'm curious about . 1) where the other multiplayer KSPs are ( if implemented , they may not be for a variety of reasons. 2) if the other surface bases from KSP1 are in game. And usable. We know the island airfield is there but what else. 3) how hard is it to build a basic boat, the two craft that I saw launched freaked out. 4)Where is the Mohole.

Sorry decided this belongs in its own thread

Given that successful rockets have used things from gasoline to alcohol to kerosene to methane to a variety of concoctions that have people going hey we and the communists were racing each other back then, and people thought that things like Pluto and it's nuclear ramjet was a good idea... So where are they?

Just wait untill you meet a person who identifies as trinary. And yes my neighbor identifies as trinary. It's confusing.

I kind of doubt anyone will be interested in modding tutorials that really only get seen once if that. n

A couple of people showed the Kerbal inside the rocket. Sometimes it was accidental. Basically it's just the idle animations you see in KSP 1 so far, but they really did not have time for more than that because only 3 hours and a bit to do everything, including break bad habits from KSP1 And figure out the differences Sorry

Well I'm enraged that you prefer anyone not Matt Lowne as the only voice actor for KSP. Seriously the guys one energy drink away from turning into a Kerbal all the time . I Kid. But seriously thinking your the only one with a good idea and therefore that's the way it should be is, well, Sitting around sulking about it in forums is a waste of time. There was a reason why they did things, like keep or doing only minor tweeks to existing engines. Mostly to keep parts and performance comparable to KSP.

I think over a year ago, because of a question , and honestly being a speaker of English and typonese I usually don't bother.

Ok first off we don't know if localisation included just subtitle, or actual voice acting as the French and German video I've seen did not did not even show it, and one was just a 5 : 37 clipshow Second it does take time and money to get videoes put together. Never mind having to tweek a video because different language can and will force changes in timing and pacing. Also, seriously having multiple people voicing individual clips because DIVERSITY! seriously? I don't think anyone is going to hire a small choir of voice actors to record individual multiple mini tutorials that are on the same language unless there's a decent reason, like the craft skill anf ability trainers in a mmo a while back where it was different genders and races for each one you interact with.

Yah I'm spoilering this as well That said love the changes

Good find! While it's good that they have 4 launch centers. There's still questions... * Are they clones of each other or does each have its own style. * Are they upgradable and if so how is that handled.. * Also obvious but how is time warp handled, or is it functionally ignored apart from locations of planets ships any other objects and moons . That's why there's forums! I wonder when we need to start locking some of the mega threads and just start launching new ones.

Maybe via Xbox cloud but not sure how that works with third party games

A number of KSP ers ( including me) ran into some of that. When people were first arguing about realistic space flight because NASApunk in Starfield as being part of space flight in that game (on the reddit for Starfield) we were like um no your really not going to get that, for reasons why see KSP and several videos.( I know a couple of people who tried it, and they came to the obvious conclusion that trying to dogfight in orbit in space was dumb )about various problems involving orbital interception maneuvering and flight . I know it came up in star citizen as well. Well that ands Scott is already planing on doing KSP 2 videos for his own channel at his own pace.

I think the idea of a ground launch was to use a conventional explosive for the first pulse. Granted that was not going provide much thrust so each following pulse was going to be nuclear, which was why using Saturn's main stage as a booster/ First stage came in. Actually they had a lot of ideas for using Saturn's first stage , including launching NERV based cargo tugs.

What were your impressions from the pre release videos Good. Overall the look of painted rockets. Ui seems almost perfect Bad. No auto struts. The performance hit at high part counts.saves seemed to randomly pick up odd artifacts . The blurry. And no this is not exactly referring to videos that blurred out some things like a rock and/ or anomaly s *. Hopefully there's a optional way to turn down some of the paint shine. Water waves on landing seems to be a bit exaggerated but they may turn that down. Also a couple of videos had a few too many "oh I need to show you what I'm doing with a hand held camera" cuts. To be fair some of it was ok, and ones showing who was around them was fine. *To be fair, speculating what those blurs could be will be fun. Although one we know was apparently a rock ( asteroid? ) of some kind just from a audio comment in the background. I don't think anyone got close to one of the arches.

I think I recall one review ran into something early on and they asked him not to show it and darn it I'm going to have to watch them again

The odds are reentry heating was disabled because they expected the press at least to end up trying to reenter at speeds exceeding solar system escape velocity. Not Kerbol system EV. . Solar system EV.