Lan_Morehell
-
Posts
40 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Good evemimg! Please help me with Real Fuels. It has just stopped showing any tank structure info along with filling and utilization info. I can still fill the tank through the menu from Actions editor, but it is completely empty in part options. Cannot see nay warnings related to real fuel also. It seems just like I had inadvertently turned something off and don't know what.... I have RO and RF updated to last version. Tried to downgrade 1-2 versions back with no effect
-
Good evening! Having the same issue with "quick aply" on latest version. Its quite challenging to apply manually a whole lot of parts Also a small suggestion to mod - to be able to discard automatically all parts with certain use count or safety rating.... Thanks!
-
How to get one sir? I really miss this mod
-
Hi!! Could you please advice how to fix the following: 1. My ships a a piece of you-know-what. And by saying that I neither mean that my hands are growing from the wrong place, nor that I dont know how to use the mod. The problem is - this stuff is breaking dramatically even after long and vigorous testing. I make a craft, test it for about 5-6 short flights, using new parts each time, Then I test it once again with new parts, then apply these parts to the vessel. As a result I have a vessel safety rating of 9 (Excellent!!!), all parts the same (9), generation 4-5. Now. I have to fly this aircraft for a 600 miles... and... this is an impossible task! I have half of the ship broken my midway! half engines blown up, half tanks leaking, control surface failures all over the place, short circuits etc. This is just too much for an "excellent" safety rating ship! I cant get through 1 hour journey without a crash... 2. Sepatrons, They just dont work. at all. 100% ignition fail. If I put 20 of them to the rocket, all 20 will fail. But thats OK (a can of soda with a dynamite in it - anything may happen). BUT! No safety rating improvement even after dozens of flights.
-
Good morning! Is there any possibility to add habitation parameters to different station parts? For example, stockalike station parts have some very decent and handsome modules that, however, dont add anything to habitation. For example, large 2.5m crew tubes are amazing to form a great station and obviously provide a lot of room to live inside (despite the fact that no seats are available. They can play Ker-ball there!) but absolutely useless in terms of extending living lime.
-
It seems that pre-release lacks part usage count tracking. I have tried to "launch" several times (lifted rocket slowly several meters above the ground, then landed it back to launchpad), now every part in context menu shows 3 previous uses, but safety rating of every part is frozen to 1 (terrible). BTW, Why test-firing the rocket on clamps doesnt count as launch? I've had to attach a dosen of landing struts in order to lift and land the rocket
-
Hello! Is there any chance of viewing the list of parts with their actual current consuption? Sometimes its really, really hard to undestand whats draining the power throuh catecory check-uncheck For example i have a tiiiiiiiiny sat with two Z-200, Probodyne QBE, 3 OX-2m panels and Communotron 16 and HG-5R antennas... When it goes into darkness, it shows consumption of 0.44 per sec!!! holy sh, its just too much for such a tiny thing. And whats suprizing me, is that the 0.4 of this value fall into RTG/Gens category in Fusebox (unclicking gives me 0.04/sec)... How is it possible? There isnt even a sniff of generator or RTG on board... And in any case, they wouldve generated power, not consumed it.....
-
Hi! Thanks for your huge work here! I would like make a few feature requests for future releases: - Add possibility to add multiple value-action group pairs. For example to drop fairings at 60km and deploy panels an antennas at 68. This eliminates the necessity to spam parts for any chain of sequences actions that have same trigger nature (ie altitude). - for fuel trigger add possibility to break the rule of attachment- allow choosing what tank to be monitored without necessity to attach part exactly to that tank (I try to design rockets with separate service section, just like real ones, and it would be great to be able to concentrate all the control logic there). Maybe this maybe done as an upgrade to existing part and be unlocked somewhere farther in tech tree, like adv.unmanned. - abort activator on G-force/catastrophic failure event (but it's already been discussed in automatic abort thread) Thank you!
-
Hello guys! Is there any chance on getting this mod work in 1.4.3? I'm playing in hard mode with no flight revertion, so I really need something more reliable to fire the LES than my hands... Jeb's life insurance is very-very expensive, so i decided not to purchase it and make an escape system instead...
-
[1.4.x] Stock Antenna Balance - July-29-2018
Lan_Morehell replied to WuphonsReach's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Houston, we have a problem here Somehow every relay antenna now has a fixed consumption of 500/sec... Its absolutely impossible for me to fulfill such a huge demand. How can I change or fix this? All this stuff happening in 1.4.3 -
Thanks for such a detailed answer. Getting clear now I mean that fot example my FL-T800 gots rating of 5 after only 5 or so launches. Which means that from now on I can forget about this part in terms of probable failure. And this is even before i have reached the surface of the moon in career. I'm really afraid that by the time I advance to something farther than Duna, my ships may become absolute redundant... and that neglects the mod meaning
-
Thanks! But then it really lacks the score base value... Safety rating is 1 from what? 1 of 5 and 1 of 20 makes a big difference. At what rating part failure is extremely remote? Maybe a brief description may be added for a good understanding? something like 1:"this piece of sh... was broken even before assembly on a vessel" and 10:"shiny piece of art that can make it to the hell and back without a scratch" It there any way to adjust the speed of safety growth? foe example slow it by half, so the part doesnt get relianble too fast
-
[1.3.1] Ferram Aerospace Research: v0.15.9.1 "Liepmann" 4/2/18
Lan_Morehell replied to ferram4's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Thats fair enough... Now we have to find out where is @ferram4 His last post was more than month ago -
HI! Could you please advice me on a few questions: Is sthere any chance to get a summary of failed parts and kinds of failures during flight? Or at least see a failure description in part menu? Right now I can only briefly see the announciation of failure, then it disappears. If it's missed, you can only guess. On right-clicking on failed part i also cant see whats exactly happened. For example if the solar panel movement failed, the only way to get to know is guess and logic (it doesnt move) How to get the actual failure probability of a particular part? now in context menu I can only see the safety rating, which somewhy never gets above 5. But how can I convert rating into probability per flight hour or minute, or flight cycle? How fast the failure probability decreases? What time the part should spend in flight so the failure probability drops twice? What flight time counts towards it? Does the time spent as a space waste count (some tanks can orbit for years in this case) What are the conditions for test firing the part? should it leave the ground? If i make a test facility that jumps for 1m, then lands back on kerbin and spends there an hour, engine running at idle until zero fuel, then recovers - does it count? Whooooff, Thank you in advance
