Jump to content

golkaidakhaana

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    608

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by golkaidakhaana

  1. golkaidakhaana
    I noticed a minor issue with the MRC parts. The heatshield has fuel crossfeed disabled so the monoprop supply on the service modules is unusable.
  2. golkaidakhaana
    I think so, I use 1.8.2 but I don't recall 1.9 changing much.
  3. golkaidakhaana
    Uh, how do I get the new fairings, and non-procedural fairings in general?
  4. golkaidakhaana
    The developer hasn't been online in almost a year, and the mod hasn't seen any development in almost 2 years. I highly doubt we'll see any more work done to the mod.
  5. golkaidakhaana
    Why don't you test it yourself?
  6. golkaidakhaana
    Energia is already in Contares, and you can make Energia/Buran using Tantares and Cormorant Aeronology.
  7. golkaidakhaana
    Because you've done nothing but complain about issues he's already aware of.
  8. golkaidakhaana
    I don't really know, using LFO for the OMS would be more accurate because it uses a liquid bipropellant, even in Making History the Apollo SPS uses LFO. I never really thought about it much.
  9. golkaidakhaana
    OMS engines are AJ10s which use bipropellant N2O4/Aerozine 50.
  10. golkaidakhaana
    Helios-A and -B https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_(spacecraft)
  11. golkaidakhaana
    IDCSP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Satellite_Communications_System#IDCSP
  12. golkaidakhaana
    I only play in sandbox mode so I have no idea, might be better to wait for the official release. Be careful to remove any depreciated parts from crafts when updating, though.
  13. golkaidakhaana
    Well, like Pappy mentioned, those are the old and soon-to-be depreciated Juno/Jupiter parts, so I'd guess there's probably some issues with them, though I'm personally not familiar with the LV family and never used those parts in-game, so I might be wrong. You can download the latest version of the development branch for completely revamped Juno/Jupiter parts (still WIP) which fly pretty good, I can get to JNSQ orbit easily with them.
  14. golkaidakhaana
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that fairing is intended for the old Able/Ablestar parts.
  15. golkaidakhaana
    Ummm, those parts aren't even released yet...
  16. golkaidakhaana
    But having both RCS and main engines use LFO also eliminates this problem while also giving you more dv.
  17. golkaidakhaana
    Did you try retracting the docking port after making contact?
  18. golkaidakhaana
    Minor request, do you think it'd be possible to make a Salyut dark grey thermal texture variant for the 6-way hub and endcaps?
  19. golkaidakhaana
    I agree, I think LFO would be better. It would also be more accurate, seeing as Soyuz uses N2O4/UDMH bipropellant and not monopropellant. EDIT: The main reason I'd want LFO RCS parts is to make building TKS/FGB crafts easier, seeing as the fuel tanks hold a crazy amount of LFO and no monoprop. It's a shame people seem to want monoprop for Soyuz more than LFO.
  20. golkaidakhaana
    Oh wow, this update is going to be amazing.
  21. golkaidakhaana
    Just out of curiosity, what ever happened to the single-nozzle Gamma engine and Cobaltwolf's Europa expansions?
  22. golkaidakhaana
    The new Soyuz parts are truly superb, just tried them all out for the first time. Amazing! Seeing as both Soyuz orbital engines have now switched to using monopropellant, am I correct in assuming the Progress control segment will be switched to contain monoprop instead of LFO?
  23. golkaidakhaana
    Hell yeah, I absolutely will donate if it means we'll get a KH9.
  24. golkaidakhaana
    Wait, if those are both barbarian, what was the proposal of clustering 7 Delta II cores and 3 STS SRBs called?
  25. golkaidakhaana
    That's normal, just autostrut it.
×
×
  • Create New...