ImperialistPigDog Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Hey dose any one know if old craft will load up in 1.0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orven Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Says in the contract where you have to get the tourists.Mine says "Sub-orbital trajectory" which means - anywhere - as long as it is sub-orbtial and on Kerbin.Oh, it really is. I'm completely blind again. Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tater Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Messed with it for a few launches in sandbox, no time til tonight to play with it more. I'm not liking the fairings at all. Trying to make an interstage is a PITA, and there is no simple way I can see from fiddling around to make clamshells vs potato chips. If it requires a wiki page, it's a bad UI. Capsules in DRE/FAR worked as expected, a capsule reenters properly blunt-side down with SAS off. This requires constant control input in 1.0.The SAS cannot deal with the atmosphere, if you set it, it gets very confused in the atmosphere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BagelRabbit Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Dear SQUAD,If you scroll down to the bottom of the KSP website, there's a picture of a rather nasty-looking (sorry) rocket made in some older version of the game; it even has the red launch tower behind it. Also, there's clouds in the 'atmosphere' above it. Clearly, this isn't the version of KSP that we know and love.I'd love to see Kerbal Space Program properly represented on the Kerbal Space Program website, which means a rocket made in a version of the game less than a year and a half old. Also, no clouds.Would you mind at least considering these changes? Other than that, I love the new website and am looking forward to playing KSP 1.0.(By the way, sorry if this has already been mentioned. I just got back from college and haven't had time to read the entirety of this thread yet.)Sincerely,Upsilon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basic.syntax Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 ... no simple way I can see from fiddling around to make clamshells vs potato chips...No user adjustment for fairing separation - yet. But, Squad heard the requests (reddit AMA link), an option for separation will be made available, in the next update. Hopefully soon-ish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmchairGravy Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Has anyone seen the Tri-coupler anywhere in the career tech tree? It's in in the Structural tab in Sandbox but I can't find it in the career tree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basic.syntax Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Hey dose any one know if old craft will load up in 1.0?Yes! I've loaded .90 all stock parts, no mod parts craft, 500+ part ships, without a problem. Struts and fuel lines still attached Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialistPigDog Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 You guys think Squad threw in this sweet sight for players who make military craft. Squad is awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bedwyr Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 No user adjustment for fairing separation - yet. But, Squad heard the requests (reddit AMA link), an option for separation will be made available, in the next update. Hopefully soon-ish Ah, good. Triple would be marvelous, but I'm happy with an option for two.Er, feature request: petal quad interstage separation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceXray Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 downloaading now, sweet thank you Squad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialistPigDog Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Yes! I've loaded .90 all stock parts, no mod parts craft, 500+ part ships, without a problem. Struts and fuel lines still attached Awesome, I was a bit worried! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antiquark Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 We need more screenshots, people! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Rocket Scientist Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 We need more screenshots, people!Here you go:Javascript is disabled. View full album Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hazard-ish Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 I am still getting the 'server migration' issue whenever I try to load the website. It's been several hours after the initial release so is there something I am missing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon144 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 STOCK BEARINGS NO LONGER FUNCTION. I have little reason to play KSP anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basic.syntax Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Awesome, I was a bit worried!...but everyone keep in mind that forces applied by the aerodymanic overhaul may "break" old craft; nose cones and cargo bays didn't matter, and re-entry heat may hurt. HarvesteR's note from reddit (link) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HafCoJoe Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Dear SQUAD,If you scroll down to the bottom of the KSP website, there's a picture of a rather nasty-looking (sorry) rocket made in some older version of the game; it even has the red launch tower behind it. Also, there's clouds in the 'atmosphere' above it. Clearly, this isn't the version of KSP that we know and love.I'd love to see Kerbal Space Program properly represented on the Kerbal Space Program website, which means a rocket made in a version of the game less than a year and a half old. Also, no clouds.Would you mind at least considering these changes? Other than that, I love the new website and am looking forward to playing KSP 1.0.(By the way, sorry if this has already been mentioned. I just got back from college and haven't had time to read the entirety of this thread yet.)Sincerely,UpsilonYeah I would have to agree with you Upsilon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prof. Endwalker Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 (edited) I am literally crying right now. 1.0 is everything I ever wanted and more. This has to be one of the best updates, excluding the .17 update. This update gave so much. I have always wanted and IVA view for everything, and that's what I got. I always wanted fairings, and that's what I got. I always wanted more landing gear, intakes, and plane parts, and that's what I got. I can die a happy man now. PS. This is my 100th post, so the celebration for my 100th post will be my 101st post! Edited April 27, 2015 by Prof. Endwalker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialistPigDog Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Ships in 1.0 handle like a dream! Thank you Squad!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryer_lint Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 STOCK BEARINGS NO LONGER FUNCTION. I have little reason to play KSP anymore.Bearings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worir4 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Is it just me or has the physics range increased to like 10km+? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tery215 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Screenshots alone cannot describe the awe of crashing into things at 15g with the brand new camera shake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialistPigDog Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Fairings are great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whackjob Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 For the sake of hilarity: Take the 3.5m storage can, and put a 3.5m Monoprop tank in there. Put it in the middle of a rocket. Now go to launch it!For those of you wanting cinematic rapid unplanned(?) disassembly, this is a very handy method. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frybert Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 For the sake of hilarity: Take the 3.5m storage can, and put a 3.5m Monoprop tank in there. Put it in the middle of a rocket. Now go to launch it!For those of you wanting cinematic rapid unplanned(?) disassembly, this is a very handy method.Have they ever attempted to hire you as a tester? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts