Jump to content

[1.12.5] Bluedog Design Bureau - Stockalike Saturn, Apollo, and more! (v1.14.0 "металл" 30/Sep/2024)


CobaltWolf

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pappystein said:

Mass is scaled in BDB by fuel capacity (it is a direct result of the fuel capacity.)   The mass you see listed is for the NON-TANK (structural rings between the tanks etc)  Those are a very SMALL part of the tank mass.

depends on what you are building.  LDC covers SOO MANY DIFFERENT ROCKETS!

My favorite is using the Herkales parts, I run XLR129s or RL20s in a 4x arrangement  and 2 or 4 UA-1207s depending on payload.   All engines ignite on the ground in my builds.    I have also used the RMM CH4 STME engine as seen:
 

That particular rocket built many of my International Space stations (since I don't like how robot arm works in KSP either via expansion or mods)

Second stage is big tank with LR87-LH2 VAC engines (2 or 4)

While this is not a "Historical" Build, most of the 1980s and 1970s and 1960s LDCs were all Aerozine 50 / NTO,  There was documentation (shop talk, not an actual design) for a proposed LCH4 variant right as Lockheed took over Martin Marietta.

 

Ive tryed building it like this Titan 3L2 and it doesnt have the trust once the srbs are gone. Even with ground lit version

 Im going to either use the E-1 and switch to RP-1 or use LH2 second Stage. Probably both.  All I know is that stage 1 and 2 being aerozine50 do not work haha. I want to stick to parts from that era. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, dave1904 said:

Ive tryed building it like this Titan 3L2 and it doesnt have the trust once the srbs are gone. Even with ground lit version

 Im going to either use the E-1 and switch to RP-1 or use LH2 second Stage. Probably both.  All I know is that stage 1 and 2 being aerozine50 do not work haha. I want to stick to parts from that era. 

First, if we are going to use a websource best to use one that is somewhat accurate even if you have to use Wayback machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220321062228/https://www.spacelaunchreport.com/Titan-3L24.jpg

Sourced From:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180405050445/http://www.spacelaunchreport.com/library.html

Mark Wade (Astronautix) was a one man Wiki for most of Astronautix and has quite a few errors across much of the work.   Great place to find a name for something...  Not so much with actual history/operation of hypothetical units.

Conversely,

While Ed Kyle (owner of now defunct Space Launch Reports) is also a one man crew, he uses forms like NASASpaceFlight to verify data before publishing it, and more to the point, ACTUALLY posts(ed) corrections

you are using the TWIN BELL LR87s for AZ/50 then correct?  Not the Single Bell engines?

LR87-AJ-9/11 SHOULD lift a 3L2 with a moderate payload.  Also just like regular Titan, if you are flying with full tanks you are "fooling yourself"  reduce tank capacity to 90% all tanks for AZ50/NTO

from my notes, the LDC tanks should be at 87.5% full   All but one tank at 90% full and the larger of the upper stage tanks at 80% full should get you the valid numbers roughly

 

Edited by Pappystein
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...