Guest Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 EVA Parachutes & Ejection Seats, vens stock revamp, mechjeb 2, and kerbal engineer redux. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regor Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 (edited) I don't want KER because I want to do the calculations by hand, like how everyone should play KsP Edited July 11, 2017 by mabdi36 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeltaDizzy Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 (edited) Don't tell me what to do I use it for terrain altitude. KAC, Scatterer, Texture Replacer Edited July 11, 2017 by DeltaDizzy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinhero100 Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 KER would be nice in stock, and I heard other people say to put a RSS option, so you don't have to suffer the installation (I Don't use ckan) and bugs when you play Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKSPBeginner Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 On 2/7/2016 at 1:29 AM, MachoCyclone said: I have B9 Aerospace, KW Rocketry, Kerbal Attachment System (KAS), the Interstellar mod, MechJeb2 (although I hardly use it anymore) Out Planets Pack, Other Worlds Star Pack, SafeChute, Final Frontier (not sure why its named that as it gives badges and ranks to your Kerbals), Infernal Robtics and the necessary dependencies to support the mods. They were all installed using CKAN. I also followed this video on how to make KSP run more reliably. Expand You have Mechjeb? Noice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jas0n Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 I would like Kerbal Engineer, or at least the stuff in the editor. Also editor extensions, KAC, Procedural Parts, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceCube2000 Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 SVE, SVT, Scatterer, Distant Object Enhancement, PlanetShine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 (edited) On 7/29/2017 at 4:15 AM, SpaceCube2000 said: SVE, SVT, Scatterer, Distant Object Enhancement, PlanetShine. Expand Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail! Edited July 29, 2017 by Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regor Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 5:49 AM, dundun93 said: Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail! Expand EXACTLY! THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH STOCK MODS. KSP IS SUPPOSED TO BE EASY ON YOUR COMPUTER. DEBATABLE Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoliteDenial Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 For me personally, I enjoy the visual mod Scatterer. It gives planets with an atmosphere a clean look. Also the sunrises from Duna are pretty neeto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 4:55 PM, PoliteDenial said: For me personally, I enjoy the visual mod Scatterer. It gives planets with an atmosphere a clean look. Also the sunrises from Duna are pretty neeto. Expand BUT IT SHOULD NOT BE STOCK! but i do like it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 29, 2017 Share Posted July 29, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 10:11 AM, mabdi36 said: EXACTLY! THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH STOCK MODS. KSP IS SUPPOSED TO BE EASY ON YOUR COMPUTER. DEBATABLE Expand He just tried scatterer... he turned his computer into a toaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceCube2000 Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 On 7/29/2017 at 5:49 AM, dundun93 said: Why would you choose scatterer? Don't you know that most people(including me)does not have a fast enough computer to process that! It would slow down my computer to the speed of a snail! Expand Because it looks nice. Players would be able to disable it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 On 7/30/2017 at 12:17 AM, SpaceCube2000 said: Because it looks nice. Players would be able to disable it. Expand oh ok Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiffedStarfish Posted July 30, 2017 Share Posted July 30, 2017 I don't want any mods in stock. Mods are optional extras, and removing the "optional" bit from that for some mods would just be annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casualnaut Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 I want a extra type of save that is like Kerbal Kommander. I want to be a space pirate, miner, colonist, or merchant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerBlitz Kerman Posted August 3, 2017 Share Posted August 3, 2017 (edited) IR, and not a mod yet but the better Kareer Kontracts link in my signature... a smaller scientific missile size. And also have it stay loaded and head to an altitude. Edited August 3, 2017 by KerBlitz Kerman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xemina Posted August 11, 2017 Share Posted August 11, 2017 Modular Rocket System, KER, Docking Assist... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAmNotCreative_21 Posted September 2, 2017 Share Posted September 2, 2017 We need chaterrer Karbala engineer plus a metric crapton of other "stock" mods Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedPandaz Posted September 20, 2017 Share Posted September 20, 2017 Definately TweakScale, Planetshine, Airplane Plus/KAX and RealAtmospheres for a start Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mukita12 Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 All i want Just PROCEDURAL PART AND BETTER BURN TIME!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 On 7/30/2017 at 8:12 AM, MiffedStarfish said: I don't want any mods in stock. Expand As soon as a feature is integrated into the stock game it ceases to be a mod and is then stock. Like docking for example. I bet you use docking even though that used to be a mod. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spricigo Posted October 13, 2017 Share Posted October 13, 2017 On 10/13/2017 at 10:11 AM, John FX said: As soon as a feature is integrated into the stock game it ceases to be a mod and is then stock. Like docking for example. I bet you use docking even though that used to be a mod. Expand That is his point. When it get integrated into stock the option to not have it is gone, while nothing was really added. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John FX Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 On 10/13/2017 at 4:58 PM, Spricigo said: That is his point. When it get integrated into stock the option to not have it is gone, while nothing was really added. Expand That can be said of any feature, it is not a valid argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spricigo Posted October 16, 2017 Share Posted October 16, 2017 On 10/16/2017 at 10:38 AM, John FX said: That can be said of any feature, it is not a valid argument. Expand No it's not necessary like that for any feature. Take for an example satellite networks, before Comment there was the Remote Tech mod. Remote Tech is still an option for those that prefer the way RT handles the communication, stock Commnet didn't 'kill' or "replaced' RT but rather added a third option (no network, RT, Commnet). Granted that now Commnet is part of the stock game there is no "KSP install without Commnet" but that is besides the point, @MiffedStarfish's concern may as well be about the 'big' mods that makes extensive changes to the game, not the simple "add this part"/"tweak this readout" /"provide a simple mechanic" variants. Keeping the example, Commnet can be seen as a "lesser problem" or even "a good feature" that besides the worries add something good for the majority of the player without much hassle for anyone while the "make Remote Tech stock" option would be a bit more intrusive Of course that is not a big deal for a few 'good mods' , but as we add more and more some PotatoesTM start to become crispy and some hamsters start to get tired after a quick exercise in the wheel that runs the CPU, and the less fortunate player that need to play in those conditions have reason to be concerned. It's not really the decisive factor but something the devs should consider. Personally, I have my list of mods that "should be stock" but also a number of mods I use and see no necessity (and even reason against) to be integrated in the core game. I would not mind if those become stock but can understand who will be bothered by the game becoming more complex than 'necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.