happliy Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) My computer is ready for a 64-bit system. Can you tell me if I can play the MOD after my computer has risen to 64 bits? Processor AMD Athlon II X2 250 dual core Video card ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 4 GB of memory Edited October 30, 2017 by happliy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RexPowerColt Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 @Nils277 Apparently I need 5 posts to pm you which I don't have, so I'm going to link the files here, sorry:( Base only file for VAB is there. Also the save file named 1 is in full sized RSS mod, Moon Base Alpha is the base that I showed at imgur post, I don't know if it will work for you because of RSS. Base already has a level 4 engineer and transferring en u worked for me as intended. Base Files Thanks again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Truffles Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nils277 said: @Mr. Truffles Regarding the reactor. Do you have NFE installed? The NFE version of the reactor uses cumstom modules to generate power. Maye TAC-LS does not recognize them. The reactor turning off might also be a problem that it automaticalls shuts down when it overheats. @Nils277 Thanks a lot for your quick reply! I dont have NFE installed, so that should not be the problem. I have a LOT of other mods installed though, so it would of course be possible that one of them messes with your reactor. Also, overheating should not be an issue. I tested the reactor quite extensively in sandbox mode on two bases on Laythe and Minmus. Both have more than enough radiators to keep the reactor running. At least i did not encounter any issues when i timewarped for days and weeks. I also did a quick test on the launchpad with too little cooling to see how it looks like when the reactor overheats. Thats not what happens on Laythe and Minmus. Also, the two bases are totally fine when i switch to them. The Laythe base for example has a battery capacitiy of around 15000 electric charge. When TAC-LS tells me it is running out of power and i switch over, the batteries are completely full and the reactor is running fine. If the base was really running out of power they should be at least partly empty. I mean, the reactor is powerfull, but not powerfull enough to recharge those batteries in that one second it takes me to check on them. And as soon as i switch to another vessel the clock for energy remaining on TAC-LS is ticking down again, as if the Laythe base had no energy production at all. I will fiddle around with it a bit more, maybe i can find the issue. Thanks again for this great mod, very nice work! Edited October 30, 2017 by Mr. Truffles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jalaris Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 Thanks for the work you do on KPBS! I consider your mods a must-have in my stock KSP game. However, I was wondering, could you please create an analog for EPL's space based parts? EPL is also a must have feature for KSP, however, it's packaged models for the orbital construction/recycling/etc... are so bad. I adore your work so much, i'd even be willing to donate to patreon if you could create some EPL analog parts for the orbital construction. Thanks for all your hard work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DStaal Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 8 hours ago, Jalaris said: Thanks for the work you do on KPBS! I consider your mods a must-have in my stock KSP game. However, I was wondering, could you please create an analog for EPL's space based parts? EPL is also a must have feature for KSP, however, it's packaged models for the orbital construction/recycling/etc... are so bad. I adore your work so much, i'd even be willing to donate to patreon if you could create some EPL analog parts for the orbital construction. Thanks for all your hard work! This mod already has some EL parts for ground-based construction. Space-based construction would be out of scope for this mod: It's *planetary* base systems, after all. Might I suggest the mod below? It hasn't seen any updates since 1.2.2 - but it's just a parts mod, so it hasn't needed any: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Jet Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 On 30.10.2017 at 11:43 AM, happliy said: My computer is ready for a 64-bit system. Can you tell me if I can play the MOD after my computer has risen to 64 bits? Processor AMD Athlon II X2 250 dual core Video card ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 4 GB of memory Should not be a big problem. Though 8+ Gb of memory is recommended for both x64bit system and heavily modded game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nils277 Posted November 2, 2017 Author Share Posted November 2, 2017 On 30.10.2017 at 10:20 AM, RexPowerColt said: @Nils277 Apparently I need 5 posts to pm you which I don't have, so I'm going to link the files here, sorry:( Base only file for VAB is there. Also the save file named 1 is in full sized RSS mod, Moon Base Alpha is the base that I showed at imgur post, I don't know if it will work for you because of RSS. Base already has a level 4 engineer and transferring en u worked for me as intended. Base Files Thanks again! Thanks. I found the reason for the issue and will make a release with a fix for the transfer of depleted fuel soonTM On 30.10.2017 at 1:06 PM, Mr. Truffles said: @Nils277 Thanks a lot for your quick reply! I dont have NFE installed, so that should not be the problem. I have a LOT of other mods installed though, so it would of course be possible that one of them messes with your reactor. Also, overheating should not be an issue. I tested the reactor quite extensively in sandbox mode on two bases on Laythe and Minmus. Both have more than enough radiators to keep the reactor running. At least i did not encounter any issues when i timewarped for days and weeks. I also did a quick test on the launchpad with too little cooling to see how it looks like when the reactor overheats. Thats not what happens on Laythe and Minmus. Also, the two bases are totally fine when i switch to them. The Laythe base for example has a battery capacitiy of around 15000 electric charge. When TAC-LS tells me it is running out of power and i switch over, the batteries are completely full and the reactor is running fine. If the base was really running out of power they should be at least partly empty. I mean, the reactor is powerfull, but not powerfull enough to recharge those batteries in that one second it takes me to check on them. And as soon as i switch to another vessel the clock for energy remaining on TAC-LS is ticking down again, as if the Laythe base had no energy production at all. I will fiddle around with it a bit more, maybe i can find the issue. Thanks again for this great mod, very nice work! Seems weird. I really sounds like a problem of TAC-LS. Or the system that runs the resources in the background. Even small foating point errors might cause this when run for a longer time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbalfreak Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) 5 hours ago, Nils277 said: Thanks. I found the reason for the issue and will make a release with a fix for the transfer of depleted fuel soonTM Seems weird. I really sounds like a problem of TAC-LS. Or the system that runs the resources in the background. Even small foating point errors might cause this when run for a longer time. I'm having the same problem with fuel cells and mining in the Mun. The fuel cells and mining can keep the EC at 95% all the Mun night, but when I warp from the launchpad the EC drains out in 1 day and kill the kerbals. When I go check it, the EC is at 95% and fuel are full. Solar panels updates without problems. Any sugestions? EDIT: seems that TAC-LS dont suport fuel cells at all, the main page says it supports only solar panels and generators. I will try to add a RTG and see how it works. Not a problem with KPBS at all. I find it one of the best mods. As a sugestion for this limitation with TAC-LS, you could add a modular RGT for the bases, with around 5 or 6 EC/s. Edited November 2, 2017 by kerbalfreak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbalfreak Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 The RTG solved the EC problem, but now other resorces drops during time-warp from the Space Center or other vessels, and even dont save the wastes properly... With the base loaded I can warp for years without any resource changing. Is this suposed to happen with TAC-LS or I'm having a bug? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nils277 Posted November 3, 2017 Author Share Posted November 3, 2017 @Mr. Truffles and @kerbalfreak So you say that that the resources (especially EC) deplete on the vessel when the vessel is not active and you timewarp, e.g. when you timewarp at the KSC. BUT it only depletes for TAC-LS, meaning that TAC-LS thinks that the resources are depleted but the resource are still there when you switch to the vessel in question. E.g, TAC-LS says that the vessel/base runs out of food but when you switch to it, the food is still there. Is that right? @kerbalfreak What do you mean by "and even dont save the wastes properly" does this mean that the waste does not only deplete for TAC-LS but is also depleted when you switch to the vessel? I think maybe @JPLRepo can shed some light on the TAC-LS behaviour? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerbalfreak Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 3 hours ago, Nils277 said: @Mr. Truffles and @kerbalfreak So you say that that the resources (especially EC) deplete on the vessel when the vessel is not active and you timewarp, e.g. when you timewarp at the KSC. BUT it only depletes for TAC-LS, meaning that TAC-LS thinks that the resources are depleted but the resource are still there when you switch to the vessel in question. E.g, TAC-LS says that the vessel/base runs out of food but when you switch to it, the food is still there. Is that right? @kerbalfreak What do you mean by "and even dont save the wastes properly" does this mean that the waste does not only deplete for TAC-LS but is also depleted when you switch to the vessel? I think maybe @JPLRepo can shed some light on the TAC-LS behaviour? Seems that TAC-LS simple don1t support fuel cells, only solar panels and generators. I solved this problem adding a big RTG. I will send some printscreens of the resources: First one, from the base (The "Kebin-Mun Base", the second one is not supposed to be self-sustaining) : Spoiler After I warp for almost a year. Only water changes a little because of the 95% cap of the drill (if I remove the water it fills up again) : Spoiler When I try to warp from the Launch Pad or other vessel: Spoiler When I get back to the base, I found this. Food has dropped, and even havent left no waste behind. CO2 stays up all the time, and has some WasteWater. Spoiler . If I warp for half a year away from the base it kills everyone. I'm taking a look at USI-LS, the counter don't consider the resources recyclers, but when I return to the base everything is calcule correctly, self-sustaining or not. Still not ideal, but usable. Will take a look at Kerbalism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Truffles Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 15 hours ago, Nils277 said: @Mr. Truffles and @kerbalfreak So you say that that the resources (especially EC) deplete on the vessel when the vessel is not active and you timewarp, e.g. when you timewarp at the KSC. BUT it only depletes for TAC-LS, meaning that TAC-LS thinks that the resources are depleted but the resource are still there when you switch to the vessel in question. E.g, TAC-LS says that the vessel/base runs out of food but when you switch to it, the food is still there. Is that right? @kerbalfreak What do you mean by "and even dont save the wastes properly" does this mean that the waste does not only deplete for TAC-LS but is also depleted when you switch to the vessel? I think maybe @JPLRepo can shed some light on the TAC-LS behaviour? That is correct. I personally only encountered that behaviour with EC and only with the KPBS nuclear reactor, though i have to admit that i very rarely use anything other than solar panels and RTGs. So it might just be a problem with depletable energy resources in general. If that is the case it most likely has to be a problem with TAC-LS. I will go and test that a bit more as soon as a have the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPLRepo Posted November 4, 2017 Share Posted November 4, 2017 Correct. TAC-LS does not currently support fuel cells.. the conversation about TAC-LS probably belongs in the TAC-LS thread not this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Truffles Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 Thanks for the clarification JPLREpo. I just startet the coversation here because i first encountered this problem with the KPBS reactor and therefore thought it was an issue with the reactor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
happliy Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 Does this MOD have compatibility issues with CommuinityCategoryKit? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nils277 Posted November 10, 2017 Author Share Posted November 10, 2017 5 hours ago, happliy said: Does this MOD have compatibility issues with CommuinityCategoryKit? No, there are no compatibility problems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NomenNescio Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 Couldn't help but notice the MAL Part still can't hibernate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nils277 Posted November 11, 2017 Author Share Posted November 11, 2017 22 hours ago, NomenNescio said: Couldn't help but notice the MAL Part still can't hibernate? You are right. Will be corrected in the next version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flart Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 (edited) @Nils277 Patch for KPBS Greenhouse's ScienceExperiment to USI LS Greenhouses is something like that Spoiler @PART[*]:HAS[@MODULE[ModuleResourceConverter_USI]:HAS[#ConverterName[Agroponics]]]:NEEDS[USILifeSupport,PlanetaryBaseInc] { &MODULE[ModuleScienceExperiment] { name = ModuleScienceExperiment experimentID = KPBS_plantgrowthstudy experimentActionName = #LOC_KPBS.greenhouseexperiment.conduct resetActionName = #LOC_KPBS.greenhouseexperiment.discard reviewActionName = #LOC_KPBS.greenhouseexperiment.review useStaging = False useActionGroups = True hideUIwhenUnavailable = True xmitDataScalar = 0.4 FxModules = 0 dataIsCollectable = True collectActionName = #LOC_KPBS.greenhouseexperiment.collect interactionRange = 1.2 usageReqMaskInternal = 1 usageReqMaskExternal = 8 } &MODULE { name = ModuleScienceContainer reviewActionName = #autoLOC_502201 storeActionName = #autoLOC_502202 collectActionName = #autoLOC_238018 evaOnlyStorage = True storageRange = 2.0 } } Edited November 13, 2017 by flart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shad_The_Knight Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 I am confused on how to set up a base properly. I have everything I need, I line up the parts with each piece having a docking port, but then when they dock, one side ends up crooked and off of the ground. I have to individually retract each landing gear to even the part out, and then they dock uneven and crooked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsaven Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 (edited) Hey Nils, or DStaal I suppose, would you guys have readily available the expanded volume of all the KPBS parts? I'm trying to do a balance pass on Dstaal's configs for USI-LS and MKS and the volume of the parts is a pretty critical component of it all. Edited November 14, 2017 by tsaven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nils277 Posted November 16, 2017 Author Share Posted November 16, 2017 (edited) On 14.11.2017 at 9:38 PM, tsaven said: Hey Nils, or DStaal I suppose, would you guys have readily available the expanded volume of all the KPBS parts? I'm trying to do a balance pass on Dstaal's configs for USI-LS and MKS and the volume of the parts is a pretty critical component of it all. I never really calculated the volumes of the parts. But the patch for Kerbalism contains the volumes in the PlanetaryBaseInc\ModSupport\Configs\Kerbalism\KPBS_MM_Kerbalism_Habitation.cfg file. I think they were done by @schrema. At least that what was said in the pull request Edited November 16, 2017 by Nils277 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsaven Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 7 hours ago, Nils277 said: I never really calculated the volumes of the parts. But the patch for Kerbalism contains the volumes in the PlanetaryBaseInc\ModSupport\Configs\Kerbalism\KPBS_MM_Kerbalism_Habitation.cfg file. I think they were done by @schrema. At least that what was said in the pull request Awesome! Glad that someone else has done the legwork on this. It looks like the numbers he came up with are only slightly larger than what I had guessed at by eyeballing it, so I'm going to recalculate my figures based off of his calculations. Once I run it by DStaal you can expect a PR from me with updated configs for USI-LS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael acevedo Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 Nils i know that it has been asked before, but if you can put it on your list of improvements I’ll appreciate it. I think we need a structural part in Kbps shape that can be stacked (or procedurally change length) to allow modules to have the same size. Very useful if you are building a symmetrical base. Currently I solve my issue by installing multiple Kbps control modules, so while not a perfect solution a similar part to the control module without the sas function is all we need if we make it passable and cls compliant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tsaven Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) Does anyone else want to chime in on these revised balance numbers for USI-LS? There's a good deal of nerfing going on due to the physically small size of the units, but some do get buffed a little. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1vQYEpfq3YMRCbIYQUJdH_hyT2GsjzMR_nPrIBD7Seb0/edit?usp=sharing Open to input on how things that can be changed are adjusted, for example less multiplier in exchange for more throughput on the Greenhouse. Edited November 18, 2017 by tsaven Forgot the link... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.