Vanguard-Warden Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 5 hours ago, Pliuple said: AoA mod, i believe Thank you i'm gonna download that mod Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uwotm8 Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 PLEASE just make an f 14 cock pit ,PLEASE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 9 hours ago, uwotm8 said: PLEASE just make an f 14 cock pit ,PLEASE. I pretty sure it's "Cockpit" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwinanday Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 There's already a great F-14 mod out there @uwotm8 No point reinventing the wheel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOC2008 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 1 hour ago, kiwinanday said: There's already a great F-14 mod out there @uwotm8 No point reinventing the wheel. I said that about the f18 cockpit but he made one anyway. Id like to see what he could do with one, but I think more to the point is he said he was pretty much done with working on 1.25 sized cockpits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Blue Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) Might be kewl to do an ejectable cockpit, like the F-111's:https://gizmodo.com/the-f-111-aardvark-a-flying-transformer-with-a-four-ma-1509524515 The 1st video on that link shows how the cockpit ejects & rights itself... Edited April 7, 2017 by Stone Blue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSgt Baloo Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 2 hours ago, Stone Blue said: Might be kewl to do an ejectable cockpit, like the F-111's:https://gizmodo.com/the-f-111-aardvark-a-flying-transformer-with-a-four-ma-1509524515 The 1st video on that link shows how the cockpit ejects & rights itself... Relevant video (Read the comments on the first one if you want to see commentary by people who worked on them. This one has sound and gives some idea of how it was developed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uwotm8 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 13 hours ago, NeoFatalis said: I pretty sure it's "Cockpit" LOL my mistake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrFancyPL Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Can you add tweakscale module to your fuelsage parts ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mechanicH Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 @MrFancyPL if you look at the previous page you will see that someone has already created a AP tweak scale file. Or even look at the OP. First page you'll see a link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TedwinKnockman66 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 How about to do a tiny egine of Po-2 (U-2) engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eberkain Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 16 hours ago, mechanicH said: @MrFancyPL if you look at the previous page you will see that someone has already created a AP tweak scale file. Or even look at the OP. First page you'll see a link. I use about 40 part mods that support tweakscale, this is literally the only one that requires a separate download. Every other one has a config that comes bundled with the mod or with tweakscale. I would suggest just adding a :NEEDS[TweakScale] to all the parts in the config and bundling it with the mod, will harm nothing and make it easier on everyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOC2008 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 46 minutes ago, eberkain said: I use about 40 part mods that support tweakscale, this is literally the only one that requires a separate download. Every other one has a config that comes bundled with the mod or with tweakscale. I would suggest just adding a :NEEDS[TweakScale] to all the parts in the config and bundling it with the mod, will harm nothing and make it easier on everyone. And I'm pretty sure blackheart said he wasn't going to add "physical" tweakscale support to the mod so people continuing to ask about it being added after it being said that it won't be is just counterproductive. The cfg isn't hard to download or install so I don't understand the issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcelo Silveira Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 4 hours ago, eberkain said: I use about 40 part mods that support tweakscale, this is literally the only one that requires a separate download. Every other one has a config that comes bundled with the mod or with tweakscale. I would suggest just adding a :NEEDS[TweakScale] to all the parts in the config and bundling it with the mod, will harm nothing and make it easier on everyone. It already has an :NEED[TweakScale] flag.and a :NEEDS[RemoteTech] for the other one, just saying. @blackheart612 you are free to add my cfgs to the mod if you want Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eberkain Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 1 hour ago, Marcelo Silveira said: It already has an :NEED[TweakScale] flag. I just redownloaded from the link in the OP and this is what I see... ***AERO*** @PART[stubbytinynose] { %MODULE[TweakScale] { type = free } } @PART[smallwingConnector5] { %MODULE[TweakScale] { type = free } } @PART[smallwingConnector4] { %MODULE[TweakScale] { type = free } } @PART[smallwingConnector3] { %MODULE[TweakScale] { type = free } } @PART[smallwingConnector2] { %MODULE[TweakScale] { type = free } } Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcelo Silveira Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 This one has the :NEED flag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbinchaser Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 We could really use an A380, or maybe an Antonov 225. On 3/30/2017 at 4:41 PM, XOC2008 said: I need to make the C-130 a hair bigger, but this is with a scale C-5 Galaxy. Omnomnom: And that son, is where baby planes come from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Lo Var Lachland said: We could really use an A380, or maybe an Antonov 225. It would mean that we need a 3.75m (or even 5m) parts line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbinchaser Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Just now, NeoFatalis said: It would mean that we need a 3.75m (or even 5m) parts line Wouldn't that be awesome? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Lo Var Lachland said: Wouldn't that be awesome? Yeah sure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbinchaser Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Just now, NeoFatalis said: Yeah sure LOL. I just think the C-5 cockpit we have right now is too narrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoFatalis Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Lo Var Lachland said: LOL. I just think the C-5 cockpit we have right now is too narrow. I think that a C5 would make more sense as a 3.75 part because IRL its shape is round, though it is fine when using with the hollow 3.75 adapter from SXT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbinchaser Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 Just now, NeoFatalis said: I think that a C5 would make more sense as a 3.75 part because IRL its shape is round, though it is fine when using with the hollow 3.75 adapter from SXT Same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiwinanday Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 (edited) Wouldn't that require an entire 5m parts line?@Lo Var Lachland @NeoFatalis I know @blackheart612 is still away on personal matters, but Edited April 10, 2017 by kiwinanday Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbinchaser Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 1 minute ago, kiwinanday said: Wouldn't that require an entire 5m parts line?@Lo Var Lachland @NeoFatalis Maybe. I mean, 3.75 might be good enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.