blackheart612 Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said: Is there any chance of Airplane Plus R23.0 working with 1.3.1, for any of us 1.3.1 players? Theoretically, it should work with 1.3.1 as long as you have the right plug-ins (The 1.4.x-1.4.4 is due to FS and module manager version). Does it not for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisias Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 Hi. I think there's a error on the .version file. The URL is not pointing to a remote .version file. { "NAME": "Airplane Plus", "URL": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/", "VERSION": { "MAJOR": 23, "MINOR": 0, "PATCH": 0 }, "KSP_VERSION":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":4, "PATCH":4 }, "KSP_VERSION_MIN":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":2, "PATCH":9 }, "KSP_VERSION_MAX":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":4, "PATCH":4 } } Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastiaz Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 1 minute ago, blackheart612 said: Theoretically, it should work with 1.3.1 as long as you have the right plug-ins (The 1.4.x-1.4.4 is due to FS and module manager version). Does it not for you? About to do it just now, last update when I tried it, there was an issue with after pressing a cockpit, (Any cockpit) on the toolbar, the toolbar become unresponsive as in unable to click on any parts, deleted the helicopter parts and it soon after worked, unless that was a bug on 1.4 users to. So I'm just going to try this update now, I'll get back to you after trying it out. ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, Lisias said: Hi. I think there's a error on the .version file. The URL is not pointing to a remote .version file. { "NAME": "Airplane Plus", "URL": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/", "VERSION": { "MAJOR": 23, "MINOR": 0, "PATCH": 0 }, "KSP_VERSION":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":4, "PATCH":4 }, "KSP_VERSION_MIN":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":2, "PATCH":9 }, "KSP_VERSION_MAX":{ "MAJOR":1, "MINOR":4, "PATCH":4 } } Believe it or not, I have no idea how .version files are supposed to work, I was just told to make one Is this game breaking? 3 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said: About to do it just now, last update when I tried it, there was an issue with after pressing a cockpit, (Any cockpit) on the toolbar, the toolbar become unresponsive as in unable to click on any parts, deleted the helicopter parts and it soon after worked, unless that was a bug on 1.4 users to. So I'm just going to try this update now, I'll get back to you after trying it out. ^^ Hmmm, alright. If you do encounter issues, you can just tell them here so we can try to fix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisias Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 12 minutes ago, blackheart612 said: Believe it or not, I have no idea how .version files are supposed to work, I was just told to make one Is this game breaking? Nops. But allow the KSP-AVC and MiniAVC to detect new versions and check compatibility with the installment. The way it is, it just make a request on the forum for nothing - it's better not to use this way, as it would delay a bit the startup and add load to the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 7 minutes ago, Lisias said: Nops. But allow the KSP-AVC and MiniAVC to detect new versions and check compatibility with the installment. The way it is, it just make a request on the forum for nothing - it's better not to use this way, as it would delay a bit the startup and add load to the forum. Hmmm, alright. I really have no idea about it, how does one go about fixing this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastiaz Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) 26 minutes ago, blackheart612 said: Hmmm, alright. If you do encounter issues, you can just tell them here so we can try to fix. Right, I've tested on 1.3.1 with just Airplane Plus and Firespitter, etc. It works very well! There is one slight issue though with the 1.5m parts, one of the issues is this: There is a flickering issue with the 1.875m Liquid Fuel Fuselage, it is also unclickable if you don't connect it to a part. Other than that, everything so far is working soundly. Edit: May aswell say now, any chance of an SU-27-esque cockpit? ^^ Edited July 20, 2018 by Sebastiaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisias Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, blackheart612 said: Hmmm, alright. I really have no idea about it, how does one go about fixing this? Something like this: { "NAME": "Airplane Plus", "DOWNLOAD": "https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/140262-131-airplane-plus-r200-supersonic-6-retractable-landing-gears-jan-23-2018/", "URL": "<some url to a remote .version file>", [SNIP] Since you are not using GitHub or something, you can create a login here if order to publish a .version, as in this example. Edited July 20, 2018 by Lisias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said: Right, I've tested on 1.3.1 with just Airplane Plus and Firespitter, etc. It works very well! There is one slight issue though with the 1.5m parts, one of the issues is this: There is a flickering issue with the 1.875m Liquid Fuel Fuselage, it is also unclickable if you don't connect it to a part. Other than that, everything so far is working soundly. I fixed this on my dev version already! *stomps on the ground repeatedly*. This is so infuriating Edit: @Lisias So it needs github? Edited July 20, 2018 by blackheart612 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebastiaz Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, blackheart612 said: I fixed this on my dev version already! *stomps on the ground repeatedly*. This is so infuriating Hey, at least you know now, once again. Edited July 20, 2018 by Sebastiaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisias Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 1 minute ago, blackheart612 said: Edit: @Lisias So it needs github? No. You can use anything that can download a text file from. Examples: http://ksp-avc.cybutek.net/version.php?id=538https://ksp.lisias.net/add-ons/UbioWeldContinuum.version and also github: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxgurugamer/MemGraph/master/MemGraph.version (GitHub is a little tricky, as you can't change the .version file on master while developing without triggering false update alarms on everybody - if you don't use GitHub already, I don't think it worths just due this) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 22 minutes ago, Sebastiaz said: Hey, at least you know now, once again. 21 minutes ago, Lisias said: No. You can use anything that can download a text file from. Examples: http://ksp-avc.cybutek.net/version.php?id=538https://ksp.lisias.net/add-ons/UbioWeldContinuum.version and also github: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/linuxgurugamer/MemGraph/master/MemGraph.version (GitHub is a little tricky, as you can't change the .version file on master while developing without triggering false update alarms on everybody - if you don't use GitHub already, I don't think it worths just due this) Alright, I'm sneaking in a nother re-upload. I fixed the issue regarding the 1.875m fuel tank and used a .version from ksp avc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Prates Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 congrats @blackheart612 on another great installment of your mod. What is that wingroot there I see on the pictures? The part buried inside the fuselage? I can't seem to find it in the VAB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neistridlar Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 @blackheart612 The mechanism for that passenger door looks suspiciously like mine. Is that a coincidence? Also a little fun fact, your CF34 has more thrust than the real thing. On a more serious not though. It does not seem you have airlock colliers working for the 1.875m passenger cabins. There is also some z-fighting between structural tubes on the inside, probably needs a little bit of a bevel there, like on the outside. I have not bothered checking drag cubes, since you say you have not done anything with them. Also something I noticed, that you might consider changing. The floors in the 1.875m hollow parts and the mk3s1.5 does not line up, which would be neat if they did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Critter79606 Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Anyone else having issues with the ckan download? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 21, 2018 Author Share Posted July 21, 2018 @Daniel Prates Thank you, the "root" wing is a 3-parter, it's composed of the FAT wing set. @neistridlar Trust me, I've done every way I could to have a variety of opening the door if you check the Mk1, it's based on the Citation Business Jets, the Size 2 is both for general Airline Design and Lockheed Airstair. Now I have nothing else I can think of but that. Let's settle that the Bombardier type door is like how we made it. I though I tested the 1.875m cabins already... I need to recheck it. The floors on my hollow parts don't usually line up but that would be neat, yeah, I don't know, we'll see. The CF34 is actually not performanced based on the CF34 but a middle ground between Size 0 and Mk1 engines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Prates Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, blackheart612 said: the "root" wing is a 3-parter, it's composed of the FAT wing set. Tks! But I think I didnt explain well. I was asking about the protruding volume, on the actual fuselage. The bulge, onto where the wing is rooted. Not the actual lifting surface part. Edited July 21, 2018 by Daniel Prates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 21, 2018 Author Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Daniel Prates said: Tks! But I think I didnt explain well. I was asking about the protruding volume, on the actual fuselage. The bulge, onto where the wing is rooted. Not the actual lifting surface part. Ah, that would be the Size 2 Radial Liquid Fuel Mount Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Prates Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 Ok got it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dre4dW0rm Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 CKAN download is broken, the uploaded file is corrupted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackheart612 Posted July 21, 2018 Author Share Posted July 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, Dre4dW0rm said: CKAN download is broken, the uploaded file is corrupted. Probably because of the 2 reuploads, I don't know how to fix CKAN issues though... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dre4dW0rm Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 1 minute ago, blackheart612 said: Probably because of the 2 reuploads, I don't know how to fix CKAN issues though... I've never done it myself, but I think it's just a matter of re-upload with updated meta. Here's the guide: https://github.com/KSP-CKAN/CKAN/wiki/Adding-a-mod-to-the-CKAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zakkpaz Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 (edited) could you make an SST cockpit for the new 1.5 size parts? maybe one that looks like more like the TU -144? http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cJqoo9B-9uA/UmpyWHtqDCI/AAAAAAAArc8/YNA3iyWRaEo/s1600/revell+november++(25).jpg I'm not sure if its ok to make requests so sorry if its not. Edited July 22, 2018 by zakkpaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrubbyZebra Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 2 hours ago, blackheart612 said: Probably because of the 2 reuploads, I don't know how to fix CKAN issues though... From the CKAN thread (I posted the issue over there) This is because the original download was replaced, and CKAN is expecting it to match the one that was originally indexed. To fix this we'll need to contact our server admin to purge that file out of the cache of the NetKAN bot, although when this has happened recently it has been more common for the author to fix it by releasing a new version instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrubbyZebra Posted July 21, 2018 Share Posted July 21, 2018 https://github.com/KSP-CKAN/NetKAN/issues/6643 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.