Jump to content

Guys, it looks like we've been fooled all along...


moritree

Recommended Posts

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moontravel.htm

Apparently you fall down when you turn the engine off.
Burns are magic.
SpaceX is fake because they use too much fuel.
Calculation of re-entry trajectory is 100% impossible.
Oh yeah, tesla is also fake.
There is no way that the atmosphere could slow you down.
"media" have never been to Pluto, so Pluto don't real.
NAXA is pretending that the ISS is in orbit around the Sun.
Falcon 9 should have 4 sonic booms.
You can't grow strawberries on the moon because it is too hot.
Challenger was also fake, and the fake crew are still alive.
Fuel exhaust is still attached to the ship.
Gravity assist? Bah.

It's almost sad how much work has gone into this.
No, scratch that, it's very sad.

Edited by moritree
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, inuzupunupi said:

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moontravel.htm

Apparently you fall down when you turn the engine off.
Burns are magic.
SpaceX is fake because they use too much fuel.
Calculation of re-entry trajectory is 100% impossible.
Oh yeah, tesla is also fake.
There is no way that the atmosphere could slow you down...

It's almost sad how much work has gone into this.
No, scratch that, it's very sad.

Uhhh.....

No, that's all wrong. Too many typos and it has poor grammar, too. Even if it was true wouldn't pass as a reputable source.

Edited by legoclone09
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, legoclone09 said:

Uhhh.....

No, that's all wrong. Too many typos and it has poor grammar, too. Even if it was true wouldn't pass as a reputable source.

I second that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, inuzupunupi said:

<mentions heiwaco whackjob>

Yeah, Anders Björkman has been mentioned here before. Known kook, don't give him the benefit of any more search-engine hits.

This loon builds boats. But apparently he's an expert on everything else despite having dodged the clue-bat all his life.

Edited by steve_v
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@inuzupunupi - Please note: discussion of conspiracy theories is explicitly listed as forbidden content under the forum rules. While the moderators occasionally allow poking some good-natured fun at complete crackpots, you might want to carefully consider what kind of discussion you're starting.

That said, wow. That website... just wow. I think it hurt something inside my head. :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This one has done the rounds on here before: its not even really much of a "conspiracy theory" its basically just a complete rat trying to sell a book.

*Best* case scenario, he's only stupid/crazy.

Unfortunately, its more likely he is not crazy/stupid, but just clever enough to make a living off of them.

*edit* 

ninja'd :)

NB: dont forget that atomic bombs also dont work, 911 was a hoax (and Osama Bin Laden was innocent!) and if it seems unbelievable you are suffering from  "cognitive dissonance". And also, apparently...several ferry disasters were also conspiracies? (Im not adding arbitrary things, they're all on his site)

Edited by p1t1o
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to quote myself from another thread :

On 6/22/2016 at 4:05 PM, YNM said:

It seriously depends on whether he "believe" that gravity, with all laws in it, is true. I mean, if he's a flat-earther or at least geocentric as well it'll be hard. How can we even use Newton's gravity if that's the case ?

...

On 6/22/2016 at 11:39 PM, YNM said:
On 6/22/2016 at 10:29 PM, p1t1o said:

He is fascinating though, I wanna follow him around for a day, see what gets up to, see how he survives...

The identity is fully fake though. Googling on the corporation results in a few unrelated results, two prominent : gambling machine industry and automotive. The name refers to some local swedish athlete in skiing.

This guy is just soo fake that his existence is ALSO fake.

This guy is known to be a full-fledged BS.

If any of the reader is part of the scandinavian civil servant then please, if you will, tell us the truth of this guy.

Edited by YNM
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I took the time to read just about 75% the entire page that was linked.

 

I found the man vulgar, disrespectful, patronizing, and knows enough of the mathematics to be dangerous. He has shown pictures of dead astronauts and found people that somewhat resemble them and claim the dead are alive. It's disgusting. His knowledge of science is thready at best.

 

Do not give this "person" any more attention.

Edited by GDJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, p1t1o said:

This one has done the rounds on here before: its not even really much of a "conspiracy theory" its basically just a complete rat trying to sell a book.

*Best* case scenario, he's only stupid/crazy.

Unfortunately, its more likely he is not crazy/stupid, but just clever enough to make a living off of them.

*edit* 

ninja'd :)

NB: dont forget that atomic bombs also dont work, 911 was a hoax (and Osama Bin Laden was innocent!) and if it seems unbelievable you are suffering from  "cognitive dissonance". And also, apparently...several ferry disasters were also conspiracies? (Im not adding arbitrary things, they're all on his site)

Don't think he try to sell a book, first he can not write and he is rambling in a the universe is a hoax way. 
It would be easy to make an conspiracy book based on NSA, the food industry or similar, not ranting in every direction claiming orbital mechanic and nuclear weapons is an scam, you putt off most of the regular conspiracy nuts this way.
i might be bad satire of the conspiracy nuts, however I doubt it. The paragraph about tesla was interesting, he call that tesla company is a fake company, why: because its doubt they will be able to deliver model 3 on time, yes many experts assume tesla will have problems delivering all the orders at time. Now this is something between optimistic and shady business practice. 
It don't not make the company fake, a fake company is a empty company created just for scamming like sending out fake bills. Tesla produces cars. 
And that does this have to do with spaceflight outside of Musk founded tesla and spacex?

My guess he is both stupid and crazy, might well be mentally ill. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DDE said:

I wonder how many people can be convinced of that...

http://www.revisionism.nl/Moon/The-Mad-Revisionist.htm

Now  Anders Björkman is proved to be fake and don't exist, I believe that the entry behind the Anders Björkman alias is also fake and don't exist, or rather the pages is an very early AI experiment or more likely an chatbot tried to make an page out of google search. 
The page design, content and grammar make it unlikely its an human who has made it. 
Unless the someone stand forward and take responsibility for the page we can assume its an result of some software error. its the easiest solution. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, magnemoe said:

Don't think he try to sell a book...

Oh no?

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/carnet_propositions.htm

Its about ferry-disaster-conspiracies, but still... :)

 

13 hours ago, magnemoe said:

...or rather the pages is an very early AI experiment or more likely an chatbot tried to make an page out of google search. 
The page design, content and grammar make it unlikely its an human who has made it. 
Unless the someone stand forward and take responsibility for the page we can assume its an result of some software error. its the easiest solution. 

I could go for this explanation :)

12 hours ago, cubinator said:

<snip>

It wouldn't be a thread about conspiracy nuts without that comic!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He obviously does this just for the money/attention.

" Anders Björkman, M.Sc. is a Naval Architect and Marine Engineer with more than 45 years experience of tanker and ferry design, construction and operations. "  ref

A person working with this must at least have a rudimentary understanding of fluid dynamics, and there is no way such a person could seriously believe that air resistance does not exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Nefrums said:

He obviously does this just for the money/attention.

" Anders Björkman, M.Sc. is a Naval Architect and Marine Engineer with more than 45 years experience of tanker and ferry design, construction and operations. "  ref

A person working with this must at least have a rudimentary understanding of fluid dynamics, and there is no way such a person could seriously believe that air resistance does not exist.

On the other hand, he has been conditioned over 45 years to think of any vehicle moving upwards or downwards in altitude as a catastrophic disaster situation :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Ser said:

And Moon is only a bulb in a giant black blanket. And yeah, who said we can't divide by zero? All the same liars.

They said you cannot divide by zero because infinity is not reachable but that's because they have put them in guantanamo...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2016 at 3:45 AM, Streetwind said:

@inuzupunupi - Please note: discussion of conspiracy theories is explicitly listed as forbidden content under the forum rules. While the moderators occasionally allow poking some good-natured fun at complete crackpots, you might want to carefully consider what kind of discussion you're starting.

Yeah learned that the hard way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The guy is Swedish, i.e. English is not his native language, so you can forgive him for grammatical errors.

One thing he does though is figure out  how much fuel would be needed to slow down something like a space shuttle. Instead of calling the guy names, and engaging in rhetoric, show that his calculations are wrong. See near the bottom of http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moontraveld.htm where he shows the math:

Quote

... you need ~3.6% of the spacecraft mass or 2 800 kg of fuel just to slow down 100 m/s ...
How Apollo 11 without any rocket engine aboard managed to arrive at the re-entry start point in the upper atmosphere at the right time/speed/direction in 1969 is a mystery.

I haven't been able to find a derivation of this kind anywhere else on the web. So there's the challenge: prove it incorrect.  Anybody? (without name-calling, please!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...