Jump to content

[KSP 1.12.1+] Galileo's Planet Pack [v1.6.6] [23 Sept 2021]

Galileo

By Galileo
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

Yemo

Yemo

Posted
Posted
  On 9/23/2017 at 9:42 PM, dgrin91 said:

I can't get GPP to work with RemoteTech. I'm trying just a simple SETI probe with the basic comms device and having it send temperature readings from the launch pad, but I get an error saying there are no usable comms devices on the vessel.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

This same test works without GPP but with Seti and Remote Tech installed. I'm guessing that this is because GPP renames the planets and RemoteTech expects the planet names.

 

How can I get GPP to work with Remote Tech?

Expand  

 

  On 9/7/2017 at 7:59 PM, Yakvi said:

You might be using SETI RemoteTech configs (they are installed by default in SETI mega-pack on CKAN): they overwrite everything back to Kerbal system. I've spent a LOT of time figuring this one out. Some suggestions:

  • Inside GameData, search for "Remote". Ensure you don't only have one file "RemoteTech_Settings.cfg" and it resides in RemoteTech folder. Leave GPP file be (called "GPP_RemoteTech").
  • If you have CKAN, remove any mod related to RemoteTech which isn't RemoteTech itself. 
  • At the tracking station, check that you actually have SOME tracking stations. Check their names. 
    • If not, check on Icarus. 

So yeah, the bottom line is: if you don't have connection in GSC, that mean there's something overwriting GPP configs. 

Expand  

 

  On 9/24/2017 at 2:45 AM, Galileo said:

Yep that's a common annoyance with the SETI mods, I find. Personally I think it touches far too much, basically forcing you to only use SETI.

Expand  

 

SETIremoteTechConfig and SETIcontracts were made quite some time ago, before CommNet and GPP were a thing and the latter one when ContractConfigurator was brand new.
Imho both SETI and GPP touch further than the usual (part) mod, no need to blame the older of them for not adjusting quick enough to the newer. These things happen, especially when changing the core game instead of just adding stuff on top of it (eg there is no issue with OPM). I m thankful for all the feedback and sorry for the inconveniences caused, but such problems are the inherent price of modification over addition.
I m just coming back from a long hiatus and reading up on stuff, so might not have all the info.

But it seems that for the SETIremoteTechConfig issue, changing the

@RemoteTechSettings:FOR[SETIremoteTechConfig] {

line to

@RemoteTechSettings:NEEDS[!GPP] {

would fix the issue by deactivating the mod when GPP is installed? I can not test it myself until probably the weekend, but if someone could confirm that, I could simply change it on github.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThreePounds

ThreePounds

Posted
Posted (edited)

Time to drop some praise again. Who did the Biome names? Outstanding. My fingers twitch to finally play some more GPP and my head spins trying to imagine what these cool places could be

  Quote

#LOC_GPP_Planets_Biome_StratocalciferousDisplayName = Stratocalciferous

Expand  

*clap* … *clap* … *clap* … but how am I gonna translate this … :huh:

Edited by Three_Pounds
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 9/25/2017 at 7:41 PM, Three_Pounds said:

Time to drop some praise again. Who did the Biome names? Outstanding.

Expand  

homer_lurking.gif

(Poodmund and I did it. He's guilty too.)

Stratocalciferous is a mashup word (of stratosphere, calcium) meaning "Tall calcium." The biome is exclusively the highest points, all colored bright white.

Edited by JadeOfMaar
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ThreePounds

ThreePounds

Posted
Posted (edited)
  On 9/25/2017 at 8:42 PM, Galileo said:

Some things don't need to have literal translations. Technically, they are names :wink: 

Expand  

My abitious goal for this translation is to make it seem like the mod was made in the target language while staying true to the orignal version in terms of tone, humour and themes. Normally, translating names and geographic terms is frowned upon but these are fictional so I don't think the same applies. Ideally, the end user can't determine the language of the source material making it feel natural. Taking biome names as an example, for creations like Droops I try to find something that sounds as close to the original but has a similar meaning and feel. While droops isn't a proper noun as far as I can tell, someone who knows English will still be able to associate a meaning to it because of similar sounding words like droop and droopy. One way of going about this would just be leaving it as is but I believe a German-only speaker while finding it cool-sounding won't associate anything with it. So I can changed it to Drops which is a kind of hard candy. It fits Iota perfectly!

Sorry for rambling. :)

Edited by Three_Pounds
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 9/25/2017 at 9:27 PM, symmeclept said:

It seems GPP doesn't like the latest Kopernicus release (1.3.0-7). I get the message that Kopernicus didn't load. Tried with my normal, heavily modded game, and with a clean KSP install; same result.

Here are the logs. I also posted this in the Kopernicus forum.

Expand  

Works perfectly fine. I ran it all morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
symmeclept

symmeclept

Posted
Posted
  On 9/25/2017 at 9:33 PM, Galileo said:

Works perfectly fine. I ran it all morning.

Expand  

Well, it's not loading. Was there an update I missed, or hasn't been released?

XEFFqa4.png

KSP 1.3.0
GPP 1.5.1
GPP_Tex 3.0.0
Sigma Dim 0.9.2
Kopernicus 1.3.0-7
MM 2.8.1

Again, clean KSP install with only what's needed for the test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 9/25/2017 at 10:08 PM, symmeclept said:

Well, it's not loading. Was there an update I missed, or hasn't been released?

 

KSP 1.3.0
GPP 1.5.1
GPP_Tex 3.0.0
Sigma Dim 0.9.2
Kopernicus 1.3.0-7
MM 2.8.1

Again, clean KSP install with only what's needed for the test.

Expand  

Also, Sigma Dimensions broke with the latest Kopernicus update. That may be  the issue.

EDIT: Getting clarification now: Stand By

 

@symmeclept Sigma Dimensions breaks Kopernicus at the moment. confirmed. 

Edited by Galileo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
symmeclept

symmeclept

Posted
Posted
  On 9/25/2017 at 10:17 PM, Galileo said:

Also, Sigma Dimensions broke with the latest Kopernicus update. That may be  the issue.

EDIT: Getting clarification now: Stand By

 

@symmeclept Sigma Dimensions breaks Kopernicus at the moment. confirmed. 

Expand  

Thanks for the clarification. I always forget Sigma is only needed for rescale, but my main game is 2.5x, so it's still broken. I was half right, atleast :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
4d4Garrison

4d4Garrison

Posted
Posted
  On 9/25/2017 at 10:29 PM, JadeOfMaar said:

It has just been confirmed that Kopernicus 1.3.0-7 breaks Sigma Dimensions.

Everyone with upscaled GPP games will simply be unable to load their game. Careers are safe, though.

Expand  

Dang it!

 

I love 2.5x because it makes the game realistically challenging with it essentially having the same mass to orbit ratios of RSS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pappystein

Pappystein

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

  On 9/26/2017 at 2:06 AM, linuxgurugamer said:
  On 9/26/2017 at 2:06 AM, linuxgurugamer said:

Stock scale games are ok?

Expand  

 

  On 9/26/2017 at 2:07 AM, JadeOfMaar said:

Yes, they are.

Expand  

That is because Stock scale is so awesome :)   Ok sorry Stock scale brings so may problems to this game when trying to do IRL stuff in game...   But I had to say it.  I came to Galileo for a challenge afterI had problems with a Stock System re-scaled to 2.5x...  I am happy playing Stock scale in the Galileo world because of the challenges it provides.

Edited by Pappystein
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JadeOfMaar

JadeOfMaar

Posted
Posted
  On 9/26/2017 at 2:59 PM, 4d4Garrison said:

Dang it!

 

I love 2.5x because it makes the game realistically challenging with it essentially having the same mass to orbit ratios of RSS. 

Expand  

Just roll back Kopernicus if you updated. All that you're missing out on is that it's now able to let you know if x, y or z doesn't work.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Galileo

Galileo

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
  On 9/26/2017 at 4:31 PM, JadeOfMaar said:

Just roll back Kopernicus if you updated. All that you're missing out on is that it's now able to let you know if x, y or z doesn't work.

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Expand  

 

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Galileo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
panarchist

panarchist

Posted
Posted (edited)

@Galileo - I've got a weird one here, and I reproduced the issue with only the affected addons. With the following (properly) installed:

- Kopernicus (1.3.0-6 or 1.3.0-8, tried both)
- GPP 1.5.1 and Textures 3.0
- GPP_Secondary
- OPM_Galileo 1.2.1

The OPM planets (and the relocated Eeloo) do not show up in game - just the GPP planets.

Log: https://pastebin.com/GBnhgM3b

OPM shows up fine if I remove GPP, and shows up fine if I add other Kopernicus packs like Extrasolar. (unless I add GPP back in)

Has anyone else seen this? Could I have possibly missed something obvious?  Thanks.

Edited by panarchist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...