KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) 90 (+) THE DEMON SHALL STOP US THIS TIME (dman finds a loophole somehow) dangit dude Edited March 15, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) I don't want to start @tting people, but I might have to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 91 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 92 @GRS, you are a godsend for team positive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 93 (+) Thnx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 94 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 95 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 On 3/14/2019 at 5:41 PM, Kerballing (Got Dunked On) said: FIX IT MAN, BUT ITS INVALID 37 (+) Good post On 3/14/2019 at 5:44 PM, TeslaPenguin1 said: Strontium's atomic number + I like this post. It's valid, too (Strontium's atomic number is 38 On 3/14/2019 at 6:16 PM, The_Cat_In_Space said: I am now confused 34 (+) Not a good post- it's invalid, since it doesn't follow the proper numbering sequence. On 3/14/2019 at 6:16 PM, Barzon Kerman said: 35 (+1) Invalid- it's continuing from an invalid post. The last valid number was @TeslaPenguin1's 38. 37 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 38 (+) @Dman979... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) 39 (+) JUST DON'T CONFUSE OTHERS, OKAY. Edited March 15, 2019 by GRS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 (edited) 40 (+) well, at least @The_Cat_In_Space, @Barzon Kerman and I can chew @TeslaPenguin1 out in our Discord Edited March 15, 2019 by Kerballing (Got Dunked On) Forget it... Cat got so ticked Tesla got the ban. Sorry dude! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 41 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KerballingSmasher Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 42 (+) WE SHALL WARD OFF THIS DEMON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 43 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) 44 (+) Edited March 16, 2019 by ARS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 45 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Poor positives... 44 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanamonde Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Play nice, guys. If this turns into arguments and feuds, we'll have to shut down the game like we did last time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 20 minutes ago, Vanamonde said: Play nice, guys. If this turns into arguments and feuds, we'll have to shut down the game like we did last time. Yessir 45 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) This is a mere conspiracy theory, but imagine if @Dman979 was going back and editing others' posts as to be able to create errors and revert to numbers at will, I'd be surprised by the creativity lol 46 (+1) Edited March 16, 2019 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Lets hope it's really our mistake, it'll be Impossible to win in this match if he "Cheated". 47 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Aperture Science said: This is a mere conspiracy theory, but imagine if @Dman979 was going back and editing others' posts as to be able to create errors and revert to numbers at will, I'd be surprised by the creativity lol Just now, GRS said: Lets hope it's really our mistake, it'll be Impossible to win in this match if he "Cheated". I would never do that, and it's almost a bit insulting to think it's a possibility. To steal a phrase, "with great power comes great responsibility." What kind of moderator would I be if I edited perfectly fine content to fit my whims? How could any moderator have the trust of the community after actions like that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRS Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 ...Phew...K Top Quarks, watch our mouths this time, because it's really our mistakes... 48 (+) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 47 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dman979 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 46 (-1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB-70A Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 45 (-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts