Jump to content

Falcon 9, grid fin question


Serenity

Recommended Posts

Hello i was watching the latest video of SpaceX, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXgLyCYuYA

and i was wondering, during the landing burn, the grid fins seems to gimble a lot, does it really matter at that point for them to keep working?

Does it have any considerable effect in the landing or just some minor assistance?Or its just there is no point to have a mechanism to lock them again?

 

Edited by Boyster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess: The grid fins work well while the rocket is moving fast. Only when it's really in the last few seconds of its journey does it slow down enough that they can't really affect the ship's motion. So until it's almost hovering over the pad, the grid fins can help to maneuver the rocket.

Remember how big the rocket is when thinking about how fast it's moving.

Edited by cubinator
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Boyster said:

and i was wondering, during the landing burn, the grid fins seems to gimble a lot, does it really matter at that point for them to keep working?

Does it have any considerable effect in the landing or just some minor assistance?Or its just there is no point to have a mechanism to lock them again?

Even though the engines allow quite a bit of control authority due to gimbal, they most likely still use the grid fins during the landing burn as they impart a force further from the CoM (during landing the CoM is quite low due to the mass of the engines and the small amount of propellant left), creating a larger moment arm and allowing greater control. I made a diagram:

vkOsIBc.png

Also, gimballing the engines more means less thrust going directly retrograde to slow the stage down, so the first stage's computer probably steers mainly with the grid fins/thrusters to ensure maximum deceleration as well as good control authority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RealKerbal3x said:

Even though the engines allow quite a bit of control authority due to gimbal, they most likely still use the grid fins during the landing burn as they impart a force further from the CoM (during landing the CoM is quite low due to the mass of the engines and the small amount of propellant left), creating a larger moment arm and allowing greater control. I made a diagram:

vkOsIBc.png

Also, gimballing the engines more means less thrust going directly retrograde to slow the stage down, so the first stage's computer probably steers mainly with the grid fins/thrusters to ensure maximum deceleration as well as good control authority.

Yes, but aerodynamic forces are proportional to V2, and grid fins are particularly unsuited to being low-speed control surfaces. So near the very end of the landing, they are doing next to nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of a guess, but if you're setting up a control loop, you'll have something like PID. In practice, probably something a little more complicated, but PID works for sake of discussion. Because the output of PID is desired force from control surface, the deflection angle will depend on velocity. The slow the rocket is moving, the more deflection you are going to need for the same authority, so that will feed into the control loop as well. And there isn't really an obvious lower cutoff point other than hitting the limiters on deflection. Since I'm pretty sure the fins are well balanced, there is probably no reason to explicitly shut this behavior off. So they probably just let it keep running, with gimbal on engine providing all of the authority and fins just going back and forward in futile attempt to help in the last moments of the landing. If it's not hurting anything, figuring out a shut-off timing is just one more potential point of failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, K^2 said:

Kind of a guess, but if you're setting up a control loop, you'll have something like PID. In practice, probably something a little more complicated, but PID works for sake of discussion. Because the output of PID is desired force from control surface, the deflection angle will depend on velocity. The slow the rocket is moving, the more deflection you are going to need for the same authority, so that will feed into the control loop as well. And there isn't really an obvious lower cutoff point other than hitting the limiters on deflection. Since I'm pretty sure the fins are well balanced, there is probably no reason to explicitly shut this behavior off. So they probably just let it keep running, with gimbal on engine providing all of the authority and fins just going back and forward in futile attempt to help in the last moments of the landing. If it's not hurting anything, figuring out a shut-off timing is just one more potential point of failure.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...