-
Posts
424 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
117 ExcellentProfile Information
-
About me
Certified Kindergartner
-
Location
Miserable Planet
-
Interests
Hip Cartoons, Green Doritos
Recent Profile Visitors
3,555 profile views
-
[1.12.x] [Planet Pack] Minor Planets Expansion
xXIndestructibleEVAXx replied to Exo's Lab's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
all this progress is very exciting to see! I can't wait!- 308 replies
-
- totm dec 2021
- planet pack
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yes, this contract pack has some issues. It does not always recognize when vehicles complete certain tasks, like docking. Also, it never generated the crewed mun landing contract for me, even after completing the mun orbit contract.
- 134 replies
-
- contract configurator
- contract pack
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
An update of sorts from your forum moderation team.
xXIndestructibleEVAXx replied to Vanamonde's topic in Announcements
Well that was a bummer to read -
[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)
xXIndestructibleEVAXx replied to garwel's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
The Connected Living Space Integration seems to have some serious problems. I get null reference exception spam in the logs, and the overview in the Editor is completely broken and provides no info. Example of log spam:- 1,033 replies
-
- realism
- life support
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
[1.8+] Kerbal Health 1.6.8 (2024-01-22)
xXIndestructibleEVAXx replied to garwel's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Hello! Apologies if this is a difficult question to answer, but I was wondering what the "strange ways" radiation around multiple stars means, as stated in the OP. I am very interested in using this mod alongside the Kcalbeloh System pack, and would even be willing to write configs for it for anyone else to use, but since that pack includes multiple stars I would like to know if problems would make that unviable. Thank you for your time, and this very cool mod!- 1,033 replies
-
- realism
- life support
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
@AtomicTech Main thing to report: the Juno and Goliath sounds work great, but the Juno has no visuals. Waterfall recognizes it and displays "JunoFX" but says that module has 0 effects on it (apologies if the terminology is wrong, not too familiar with waterfall) Additionally: the Dart (aerospike) has no waterfall effects, just the stock plume Full report: the kerolox plume on the Cheetah engine is slightly clipped through the nozzle; all three plumes on the Vector are totally broken (purple cylinder instead of effects), the Rhino has no effects at all, the Wolfhound is partially broken (small purple line inside plume), the Juno has no effects at all, the Dart has stock effects, and additionally, idk if you intend to do any RestockPlus engines, but if you do, the Cherenkov has only stock effects. If not mentioned, assume it's fine.
- 128 replies
-
- 1
-
- help wanted
- atomictech
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
ok, i got some homework to do, as soon as I'm done I'll give it a shot!
- 128 replies
-
- help wanted
- atomictech
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
KSP2 Hype Train Thread
xXIndestructibleEVAXx replied to Whirligig Girl's topic in Prelaunch KSP2 Discussion
I'm certainly still hyped. I do think wrt the requirements that they maybe are being conservative about "minimum" but regardless, it's early access, we *knew* it was gonna be unoptimized. -
I'm fortunate enough to already have a computer that hits these requirements, but I do wonder how well it will run on a computer that meets the min specs but with an older/worse graphics card. Are they just being extremely conservative? Would a 1080 be able to handle it reasonably well at min settings, but with lag while in atmosphere or in certain situations? I feel bad for all the people who won't be able to join in the EA at first at least.
-
I agree with everything you said, except that the explosion video you linked just looks silly, why is it totally overexposed and blinking like a strobe light lol