Jump to content

theJesuit

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,198

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by theJesuit

  1. theJesuit
    Just downloaded @MacLuky, and the issue @vardicd is having I think is because you have a two cfg files that contain respectively a PART and a +PART that are named the same, in the same tech tree node. I'm assuming the old.cfg is for existing craft in saves? If so, i think it could be deleted for new saves. Peace.
  2. theJesuit
    Are you running CTT as well?
  3. theJesuit
    I realise. This mod duplicate's the mk1 lander can part model and provides a new IVA. It would be a case for the IVA to be edited to remove one of extra seat's but although I've tried installed unity and blender and messing about I have literally no idea what or how I am doing, hence my request.
  4. theJesuit
    I believe it creates a duplicate. Peace.
  5. theJesuit
    This is awesome! Thanks for update. Many Muns ago I wondered if it was possible to get a two seat version. Whilst I realise that I can edit the cfg file to 'remove' the possibility, I've never had success at editing the IVA. Would it be possible to have two models in the download please? Peace.
  6. theJesuit
    Pumped... although these don't really worry me too much. It's like MH without the faf. The only things I would miss from MH if I went pure Restock Plus only are the engine plates. Would you consider looking to add something similar to ReStockPlus as well? Peace.
  7. theJesuit
    @Nertea, I am so grateful to you for this mod. My current playthrough on 1.8.1 is ReStock Plus with my simplex mods and kerbalism only (and KER, KAC etc). I really appreciate the possibility of updating to 1.9, making sure that none of my craft have the 'Plus parts' on and then inserting ReStock back in. So, thank you.
  8. theJesuit
    Also 1.10. I can't afford to change until ksp 2.0 goes on a discount sale
  9. theJesuit
    I'm excited about Kerbins new terrain texture. Thanks @SQUAD. Peace.
  10. theJesuit
    Oh. okay. When I put the engines in, I placed them more in line with how they balanced against the vanilla engines rather than size - the Vector is a 1.25m engine but I wouldn't place it the first few nodes of the tech tree as an example. I'll have to have another look when I get the chance, maybe over the weekend. Probably due for an update anyway with a few tweaks I've found on a more productive career play though. Peace.
  11. theJesuit
    Are the MH Bobcat and the Cheetah the same or thereabouts? Can you please give some guidance. If so, then where would you recommend they sit for balance?
  12. theJesuit
    Ah... well I guess the suits have transmitters so this also kinda makes sense. Okay. I'll relook when I next get a chance. Thanks for the suggestion! Peace.
  13. theJesuit
    If it is where the unlocking happens then I'm interested - I'm not sure Remote Tech and Kerbalism work well together though. Any suggestions would help.
  14. theJesuit
    Agreed. I do something similar. Hopefully what @linuxgurugameris working on will inspire using top tier nodes and parts to do moar!
  15. theJesuit
    Sounds good on the hiding of trival details. I is not coder. No idea what is possible or straight forward to do. Thank you for doing this! Peace.
  16. theJesuit
    I have an idea in my head to show what I mean. If I get a chance I'll whip it up in sometime tonight. Peace.
  17. theJesuit
    @linuxgurugamer maybe add a date accomplished. Then people can gloat how how quick they achieved what. Also, a name of the save game and game type so that a screenshot can not only show progression of what.
  18. theJesuit
    I think it should be a mainly visual. There are mods that already list (Kaptains Log?) All the achievement's but it doesnt display as a visual checklist. Also maybe the pinnacle and limited progressive nature of these. So instead of orbit then maybe flyby but orbit is more of an achievement by itself but not SOI as it is obvious with flyby or orbit. But then landing as and you need to be suborbital to land so there is no point to both being achievements. If you take the science out as well the flag plant is there to say I've been. The science is irrelevant methinks. Could this be it's own KSC scene like a museum building or an overlay in the RandD or astronaut complex?
  19. theJesuit
    At the most simplest ... List of bodies... pulled from where ever bodies are located I a table then with three icons for each name: Orbit Landing Flag These could be done by altogether by one crewd mission or proessively with a crewed mission to plant flag. Stock icons might suffice as placeholders for now. Grey out and then green to complete.
  20. theJesuit
    Do you have a link for Moar Kerbals please?
  21. theJesuit
    Also try kerbalism. No ullage, but parts breakdown and engine's have limited burn time and ignitions instead but don't deal with an extra resource. Designed to be a simple alternative (if you call kerblaism simple)
  22. theJesuit
    Boss fight Return 2 kerbals from Eve. Which could be 1 at a time I guess. Interested @linuxgurugamer? actually I wonder if I can do this in the tech tree... could be a combination of a tech tree and contract configurator.
  23. theJesuit
    I have replicated your rocket in an install that has the Simplex TechTree 1.11 - so the engine nerf is current - I hit 250m/s before 2500 meters. With the staging the same, TWR according was 2.14, ISP 128s and delat Vee vacuum of 1533 accroding to the stock readouts at the launch stage (S2). I probably had different things in the service bay or different parts. My diagnosis it is the engine nerf of the Simplex TechTree isn't at fault, but there is another mod which is causing problems. I've never used You COULD try and delete the SIMPLEXTechTree-Engines.cfg and see - it won't affect save games. Existing craft (including existing saved craft files) will have the nerf built in, but new craft or saved craft that have old engines swapped out after deleting the file will be okay. I'd recommend a process of removing some mods to see what might be causing the issue. So, remove half and see if there problem persists. Then whittle it down down progressively. I've never used well over 30 over the mods you have and I'm not sure what they might do to aerodynamics or craft being launched. A few more I haven't used for about three years. Peace.
  24. theJesuit
    This is a little off topic... but I think it is alongside the 'game purpose' discussion. The tech tree exists as a goal to complete it and it feels (even if we don't name it) as the point of the game. KSP doesn't actually have a point per say. It is a sandbox hame that has a career mode plastered over the top. It is a very loose and teased lore in the monoliths and descriptions of parts and planets. I would like to see an 'achievement tree'. Which would display empty spaces for all bodies in the game (for additional planet packs). So that you unlock them from orbit, probe landing, and flag planting. Then, completeing the tech tree becomes part of the process in achieving the goal of flag and footsteps on every planet. Peace.
  25. theJesuit
    It looks like Civilian Population might now scratch this itch... and LGG is maintain it . Using CC was only a makeshift way of achieving the objective. It really needed a coder to do it properly. Peace.
×
×
  • Create New...