[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

11 (-) @adsii1970 @Atlas2342 let's bring this back to 0, shall we?

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

13 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

15 (-)

[King of the Hill]

our hill again

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

8 (-) I mean, it'll be more fun to leave them organize themselves and fight than fighting their war for them... not to mention that in the end it will either feel like another negative victory with another clothing or like scoring a own goal

or like when germany stopped beating us over and allowed us to score a goal to alleviate the humiliation

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

then why don't you get back to the dark side and let the rebel scum organize themselves to fight?

8 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

7 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

1 (-) ok, most of the negatives then

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

16 minutes ago, legoclone09 said:

But I like positives.

3(+)

it's not a matter of liking or not, everybody is doing team swaps

2 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

can I call @legoclone09 to play for the negatives?

[[WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]]

1 minute ago, Shadowmage said:

Yes, but it may not be exactly what you are looking for

says while posting exactly what I wanted, a double skylab panel 

[[WIP][1.8.x] SSTULabs - Low Part Count Solutions (Orbiters, Landers, Lifters) - Dev Thread [11-18-18]]

oooh, shiny

btw, will a double version of it be available? (namely the Spacelab one from Eyes Turned Skywards)


although that seems to fall on the same case as Salyut 7, it seems that in their storyline these panels were added later

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

0 (-) @Wildcat111 @Mycroft

CHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGE

this is only for the hu3hu3

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

22 minutes ago, Dman979 said:

The negative team won round 32.

Although there were some minor mistakes, and some over-enthusiastic plays, there was nothing so significant as to prevent this from being a negative steamroll.

You may start round 33.

this is the only thing that comes to my mind when I think about how fast we won:

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

@Dman979 @RainDreamer @Deutherius

do we get any special prize for winning the 32th round before the OP got updated with the 31th round victory?

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-99 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-97 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

2 minutes ago, SpaceplaneAddict said:

-95 [-] ignore this

ok then

-95 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-92 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-88 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-86 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

1 minute ago, JoseEduardo said:

-81 (-)

Just now, Wildcat111 said:

-82 (-)

Just now, SpaceplaneAddict said:

-81 [-]

unfortunatelly this counts as a skirmish, and the last valid is @SpaceplaneAddict's -81

so let's make that a -82 (-) shall we?

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-81 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

-79 (-)

[The Number War: Count to 100 or -100]

moving on -79 (-)

EDIT: since Wildcat edited his post, the last valid is my -77