Jump to content

linuxgurugamer

Bug Hunter
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    24,979

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by linuxgurugamer

  1. linuxgurugamer
    As of now, no. It actually depends on a bug in KSP whic CF fixes. Go ahead and mark it as incompatible, if I ever do get it fixed, we can update at that time
  2. linuxgurugamer
    This makes no sense. You need to define the following: Rocket Generator Plugin Saying Questions No Mod Appearance
  3. linuxgurugamer
    Found a problem: Two parts have the same part name: From the ModuleManager.ConfigCache: First one: UrlConfig { parentUrl = Hangar/Parts/AsteroidHangars/AsteroidHatch2.cfg PART { name = AsteroidHatchNew Second one: UrlConfig { parentUrl = Hangar/Parts/AsteroidHangars/AsteroidHatchNew.cfg PART { name = AsteroidHatchNew
  4. linuxgurugamer
    Thanks. I've been looking at it, so far no idea what's happening, there isn't the expected nullref. If you could create that sandbox example you mentioned, zip up the entire sandbox save for me, would be helpful Those messages "Error 2/3" are not really errors, just left over debugging messages, you can ignore them. The other two regarding the scanType may be an issue Edit: I found the error, so will be just a matter of time to fix: 177873 ArgumentException: An item with the same key has already been added. Key: SCANsat
  5. linuxgurugamer
    New release, 2.0.12 Updated presets to have consistant names re. windowed and Fullscreen Note: If you have a problem with the window resetting after losing focus, try removing the mod entirely, make sure the directory is empty, and then reinstall
  6. linuxgurugamer
    Thanks, may take a little bit, but I'll be looking into this. I created an issue on Github to track this: https://github.com/linuxgurugamer/ksp-craft-organizer/issues/1
  7. linuxgurugamer
    No yes No idea
  8. linuxgurugamer
    Anything regarding Kerbalism needs to be asked about in the Kerbalism thread. There are two parts with internals, the Sci Lab and the Zoology lab
  9. linuxgurugamer
    So I've just gone through ALL the contract packs listed in CKAN. None of them are doing what I'm trying to do, which is collect science from multiple locations. The only thing that I know does that are some of the stock contracts where you have to fly to a certain location/altitude and get a temp reading and then go to the next one. :-(
  10. linuxgurugamer
    I'm beginning to think it's a bug in Waypoint Manager, when I removed it, things worked mostly as expected. Not sure if it's just a bug, or an oddity, where the first waypont stays in the dialog even after the second is shown
  11. linuxgurugamer
    Look at this post, it has a lot of locations:
  12. linuxgurugamer
    It seems that if an experiment is run (for example, the thermometer) at a waypoint, it will be considered to have been run when the next waypoint is reached. I'm trying to have a contract which requires an experiment to be run at three different locations, however, even though I have seperate blocks for each location with a block for the experiment, the experiment is considered run at the second and third waypoints. I've included the entire contract below, looking for any suggestions, if it's at all possible:
  13. linuxgurugamer
    New release, 2.8.4.4 Updated text in Settings window re. dragging the Nav Window Small optimization regarding initializing styles, eliminating an extra function call during OnGUI Fixed nav window initialization (was not setting background/opacity upon startup)
  14. linuxgurugamer
    Is it possible to hide a waypoint after reaching it ? The following code hides it after contract completion (according to the docs), but doesn't seem to hide it after reaching the waypoint. PARAMETER { name = Location3Arrival type = VisitWaypoint index = 3 title = Direct rover to the third Interesting Place completeInSequence = true disableOnStateChange = true horizontalDistance = 250.0 hideOnCompletion = true disableOnStateChange = true showMessages = true completeInSequence = true }
  15. linuxgurugamer
    New release, 2.8.4.3 Thanks to github user @eminterrupted for finding this bug: displayOpacity was being read incorrectly from the saved config, causing the display background opacity to be reset to 50% every game restart Added text to config window explaining how to drag the nav window Updated version file to use github for version info
  16. linuxgurugamer
    Yes, but I'm not done testing, and the latest test shows that all 3 waypoints are shown with no indiciation of which one needs to be the first; apparently they need to be completed in order More work :-(
  17. linuxgurugamer
    I solved this by using the DATA_EXPAND block. This does have the number of locations static, but it's a reasonable solution. Using this method you can't change the name of each individual waypoint, but that's ok for now. You can see the contract below, the DATA_EXPAND block has the name of the field as waypointIndex , and it's referenced in the parameter below
  18. linuxgurugamer
    I was, and then I tested and see that it's working with spaces. I had a comma in there, I'll have to test to see if that's the issue Edit: Looks like it's the comma which was causing the issue. I put the comma in and found this in the log file: 35899 [INFO] ContractConfigurator.ContractConfigurator: Loading CONTRACT_GROUP: 'RoverScienceMod' 35902 ContractConfigurator.ContractGroup: CONTRACT_GROUP 'RoverScienceMod': Providing the agent field for all CONTRACT_GROUP nodes is highly recommended, as the agent is used to group contracts in Mission Control. And yes, I did update the agent file as well as the contracts.
  19. linuxgurugamer
    Found either a bug or something had changed. The field for the agent name in the agent config used to allow spaces in the agent name. It doesn't anymore, so I'm going to have to update all my contracts to fix this :-(
  20. linuxgurugamer
    New question, this time regarding Waypoints. Currrently the contract is accessing a single waypoint near the rover. Full contract is in the spoiler below: Not sure if this is possible, but .... I'd like to be able to generate a random number of waypoints within a range (ie: 2-5). It's easy enough to create the 5 random waypoints in the WaypointGenerator block, but I'd like the main contract to be able to iterate over the available waypoints. It's a rather big contract, I don't want to simply copy/paste the sections 5 times. I am guessing it might need to be a list of indexes, and then have the index for the location arrival point to that, but not sure (yet) how to do it. Pointers would be appreciated.
  21. linuxgurugamer
    First, the hardPlanetsTemp was part of my trying to get this to work, I tried to clean up all my unused statements, I guess it got through. Second, the symptoms are shown in the image below: Even this stanza: planet = Prestige() == Trivial ? @/easyPlanets.Random() : Prestige() == Significant ? @/mediumPlanets.Random() : @/hardPlanets.Random() was met (second line, Must bean orbited body), and it relies on the stanza which is unmet to succeed. It seems to me that CC thinks that if any value in a DATA block is empty that it's an unmet condition. even if it's intended for use in a different DATA block. I tried making it hidden, but that only hides the result, but it still affects the outcome. There doesn't seem to be a way to tell CC that the results are intermediate and should not affect the conditions And of course, 5 minutes after typing that, I found this: I just added the requiredValue = false, and it's now working
  22. linuxgurugamer
    deleted
  23. linuxgurugamer
    I'm reviewing some old contract packs, and have a problem. The contract in question is in the spoiler below: The problem is with this part of the contract: DATA { type = List<CelestialBody> easyPlanets = HomeWorld().Children() mediumPlanets = OrbitedBodies().Where(b => b.HasSurface()).ExcludeAll(@easyPlanets).Exclude(HomeWorld()) hardPlanetsTemp = AllBodies().Where(b => b.HasSurface()).ExcludeAll(@mediumPlanets) hardPlanets = HomeWorld().Children() title = Planetary body orbited } It seems that if any of the values are null, then the contract is considered as not being ready to be generated; in the Mission Control, it say that Planetary body orbited is unmet). However, the contract is using those in the earler DATA stanza: DATA { type = CelestialBody planet = Prestige() == Trivial ? @/easyPlanets.Random() : Prestige() == Significant ? @/mediumPlanets.Random() : @/hardPlanets.Random() title = Planetary body } The final result is the value for planet. The problem is with the mediumPlanets = OrbitedBodies(). If I change that to AllBodies, it works, but then it selects ANY body, including those which haven't yet been reached. Can anyone suggest a solution?
  24. linuxgurugamer
    The mod is very nice, but it appears that Parallax 2 is not doing that much. Not sure why, I don't know that much about how Parallax 2 works. It also seems to prevent KSC++ from working I tried this in my graphics-heavy install, while it looks nice, and is, in many ways more interesting, I'm not sure I'm going to keep using it. Loses too much of what I have.
  25. linuxgurugamer
    I've looked in the documentation, looked at comments here, but haven't really found the answer. I'd like to know what Limit Q is showing. I know what it's for, but the number just seems to be something that you have to take on faith. Can anyone explain it?
×
×
  • Create New...