Jump to content

Galileo

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,298

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Galileo

  1. Galileo
    worked perfectly. Thanks!
  2. Galileo
    I dunno. Last I checked FAR wasn't updated. If it is, it should work
  3. Galileo
    Needs more info. Nobody else seems to be having this issue. What optional mods do you have installed? Have you tried with only GPP installed with KSC switcher?
  4. Galileo
    No, it's not. We aren't going to support TRR until they get to a stable release. I'm a bit concerned about that though since the dev seems to be worrying about tongues and other things besides the functionality of the mod. I just feel the dev has lost sight of his final goal for TRR. They have done good work so far, though. Until it's fully released, we will continue to support the original version.
  5. Galileo
    Just stick with 1.3.0-4 for now. We are close to releasing GPP for the latest kopernicus. We are just waiting on some documentation stuff to finish up, and going over the renamer to clean up the bugs.
  6. Galileo
    Yes, svt will work with any mod that doesn't touch ground textures. KSPRC should work too though. It can be a hassle to install though
  7. Galileo
    No, everything is pretty straight forward. The EVE cloud altitude is just personal taste. I feel letting SD scale the altitude makes for some extremely unrealistic
  8. Galileo
    Are you talking about the clouds clipping into the ground? If so, that's normal. Volumetric clouds cannot sit or contour to the surface. To get a "dust" or "fog" effect, this is the closest you will get.
  9. Galileo
    No rush! You have enough spinning plates above your head I can imagine!
  10. Galileo
    Yeah, exactly.
  11. Galileo
    That's not a bad idea! One of the ideas still floating around my head was to keep part counts, but allow the player to exceed them by charging the player a configurable amount x the value of each part after the cap had been reached
  12. Galileo
    You are the umpteenth person to bring that up recently about part count. Launch clamps not counting towards the part count was my original idea, and i talked to @linuxgurugamer regarding a way to implement this. Unfortunately, the part count is hard coded in KSP and cant be touched. There are some other options being looked at. I don't have a time table for anything like that though. It certainly is something i wish could be changed about ksp
  13. Galileo
    this is what im seeing: and this is what my netkan looks like:
  14. Galileo
    https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/forum/36-add-on-development/&do=add right there
  15. Galileo
    I'm glad you are very enthusiastic about this tech node stuff, but perhaps start a new thread so this one isnt flooded with it?
  16. Galileo
    I cant figure out how to validate my netkan file to determine if it works or not. I'm trying to teach myself how to write up my own Netkan files but its hard to tell if I'm doing it right. When attempting to launch the netcan.exe with --verbose <mymodidentifier>.netkan, it doesnt produce a ckan file for me to test. Not sure what I'm doing wrong, but I refuse to submit a netkan file that I can't test, and waste someones time.
  17. Galileo
    If you release it as a mod, you should name it "The Doctor's Orders" ...eh? eh? See what I did there?
  18. Galileo
    That's where people like myself, sigma and many others will come in and shake our fingers and scare shoo people away. I'm not sure what you are arguing, or if you are arguing at all. Regardless, an unlocked version will not happen. But, as ThomasP always says, " feel free to compile it yourself without the version lock". If you can't figure out how to do that, tough luck, you must wait. If only the forum software would allow for a sticky note at the top of each thread page.
  19. Galileo
    Too many people cant handle the responsibility, and show up here complaining that things are broken. To avoid that, the kopernicus devs version lock the mod. If people could learn to be adults, less like entitled kids and respect the devs wishes to not have continuous bugs reported on unsupported versions of ksp, we wouldnt have the version lock. It's not politics, it's more about respect for the dev.
  20. Galileo
    Yes. Kopernicus is version locked. The 1.3.1 prerelease is out to find bugs and issues with the stock game. Not play with planet packs. Ninja'd by an Irishman
  21. Galileo
    Like @TheRagingIrishman Stated above, OPM and GPP are good to go, however, RB makes changes to the textures, causing them to be "glossy". This is a game breaker for me personally, but if you don't mind it, go for it. I don't know of any other planet packs that are fully compatible with the latest RB
  22. Galileo
    @panarchist @TheKurgan Give this a shot. This will work with the stock system for sure, but other planet packs, I cannot guarantee due to how most have scatterer bundled and not implemented through MM. HERE
  23. Galileo
    I won't, but if someone wants to write up the NetKan/CKAN stuff for it, then sure!
  24. Galileo
    @TheKurgan I have just looked into what your issue could be, and the changes needed are a little more extensive than i thought they would be. I will post a patch when i get it done
  25. Galileo
    Can you post a screenshot of your gamedata and the inside of your GPP folder?
×
×
  • Create New...