Jimbodiah

Look I think you are not getting what I mean with "site". I mean site as in the static www content you get when you go to KSP, the page that has the 1.0 announcement. The forum is official, I did not say that, but as a lot of official game forums are not run by the actual devs, As per your point 2: As I spent a lot of time on other game forums where mods were just regular users that had been there for a long time and got appointed to official status without being employed etc. Hence "Squad Staff" could just be joe-schmoe who is a cool guy and got appointed that title to keep some order on the forums in his free time. As per 3. I don't come there as when I did there was not much to see and just the same people chatting over some coffee as all the other topics. Apparently I stepped on some toes of Squad groupies... I will refrain from posting here in the future. It's not my business that their site (not forum dangit!) is outdated and gives the impression the game is getting stale. And I won't even go to asking about any info regarding 1.1, as that is a banning offense for some reason.

Those look nice!!!

Snark: "Forum" is not "Site". Check the normal site, it announces 1.0 as just released. If I check under announcements here on the forum there is not much activity and the devblogs list some kind of x-mas poster give-away, so no activity there for the last month. RoverDude and Nathan are official Squad employees? Don;t get me wrong, but forum moderators does not mean Squad the company to me. A lot of game forums are run by volunteers/players that have nothing to do with the game itself.

Maybe put some life back into their site then? Who are the devs here then, I don't see any in the member info column, so how do I know if I'm talking to a 13 year old in a basement or to a Dev?

Seeing as their site still announces the release of 1.0 and nothing since then... Is Squad still in business?

The little Soyuz can be launched form a simple 2-stage rocket, so no need for big saturn like ships. but if you want to "just because", then I have a Jupiter III craft file for you if you like

Would it be possible to add markers for LH2 and other Community Resource fuels, please?

Meh, all the details are lost. Why animate everything if you will hide it?

Would be cool to have the matching set.

In light of the Soyuz, will we be seeing the engines for the Soyuz as well (and the booster shapes) ?

Yes please

No biggy.

Mage, did you see this thread and how it animates? http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/127810-wip-dangerously-shaded-stock-refresh/&page=2

The new C series is not in there

I have everything on max settings running with -force-d3d11.

Generally I only do unmanned or maybe 2-3 Kerbals on board, but on tourist runs (where I tend to use the mk3 passenger pod as I send up 8-12 tourists at a time) the game would just become jittery as heck. I tried later with hitchhiker cans, but they have the same problem. Without any kerbals in them, they both run nice and smooth.

I think I found it... It's not the Mk3 module, it's just the number of kerbals you have on board. If I have no Kerbals, the timer is green and fps is smooth. If I add 5+ kerbals to the craft, the timer is 50/50 yellow/green, if I add 12+ then the timer is yellow all the time... Hence a 16 passenger module and a command pod with 6 kerbals is freaking out my game. I had TAC LS installed and thought it might be that, but even just vanilla, the game freaks out with a lot of kerbals on board.

my screenshot is how I see it on other devices, but the LH tanks are just orange. Maybe they were meant to look like that though.

Thanks!!! Would be cool to see LH in the cryos (pun intended). Several mods are using LH2 these days for their engines. I love that you are doing the Ares I, it does not get enough love in my opinion, but it's my favorite crew launcher.

Mine litteraly look like they have oranges in them

It'd be cool if this mod was still supported.

Will you be supporting Community Resources so we can use LH2 in those cryo engines?

How come your LH tank is gold and mine is deep orange?

Max setup I ever had was sending 7-8 tugs simultaneously with everything needed to set up infrastructure at the planet/moons in question for mining/shuttles/landers/stations and then returning just the tugs (quite expensive setups, around 700k per tug, else I would just dump them in the atmosphere of their destination, NTVs aren't that expensive in career mode. But I never played long enough to have them do more than 3 runs each. Then I usually start another game with different parts etc.

I've seen some other mods that have their nukes eat uranium, but the rate is so low and the bundled resources so high that it doesn't really matter (KSPI Lightbulb). Would you need the uranium to run the engine, or just the generator?