Jump to content

Rodger

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    884

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Rodger

  1. Rodger
    A small QoL feature could be to show the full list of action groups, including the custom ones, by default in the editor. Instead of now having to click on an item to be able to see the custom groups. Basically reverting it to how it was a few KSP versions ago.
  2. Rodger
    Ah nice, it didn't do that last time I checked, but does now. Thanks for letting me know!
  3. Rodger
    A suggestion for a small QOL feature that could be added - have the stock science module show transmission % in the part info window in the editor, like DMagicMSAG does.
  4. Rodger
    The sound should be self contained in the mod... Ah my bad fix incoming lol New version up now now actually includes the fixed configs!
  5. Rodger
    Sorry for the very late replies! I've looked into the sound issue and have fixed it on my end. Just need to fix the seperation issue, looks like some colliders are out of place since I updated the decoupler. *edit* V0.6 up now!
  6. Rodger
    Is this still an issue in stock? Just want to see if it’s worth updating *edit* looks like Tylo is fixed in stock now, but not Eve. Uploaded an update which just removes my Tylo map, since it's not needed anymore.
  7. Rodger
    If you want to try using just the blender addon, did you set up the "Mu Shader" section of the shader tab? This is a "semi tutorial" I wrote up for using the blender addon, might help a bit https://github.com/taniwha/io_object_mu/wiki/Rodger's-mostly-unedited-tips-for-making-new-KSP-parts-in-Blender,-without-Unity
  8. Rodger
    Love it, the RCS is so cool https://i.imgur.com/yRH1l7C.mp4
  9. Rodger
    I made a Hall Effect plume with a custom mesh too:
  10. Rodger
    I got it working, and my testing seems to indicate there's some kind of hard cap of 177 degrees somewhere? So the model needs to be set up in a position where the full range of motion is less than 177 degrees away, to avoid hitting that 177 degree wall. I had my model set up in the closed position, with "modelInitialAngle = 0", but since that meant it'd need to move 180 degrees to fully open, it was hitting the hardcoded 177 degree limit. I adjusted the model so it was halfway open, with "modelInitialAngle = 90", and now it works. It also fixed the shown angle display not matching the target angle, and the differences in the VAB from flight.
  11. Rodger
    I'm trying to make a hinge part, but can't get it to work correctly. The main issue is it doesn't open fully, stopping 3 degrees short. Might be another symptom, but the current angle only goes up to 90, then back down once the part moves past 90 I've also noticed that when launching from the VAB, it always starts at 0deg, and then moves to the angle set in the VAB, instead of just starting at the set angle. The stock hinges don't do this, they launch at the angle set in the VAB. Any help would be appricated, otherwise I'm just going to have to drop support for BG and just go IR. The module in my cfg: MODULE { name = ModuleRoboticServoHinge allowFullRotation = false servoTransformName = TopJoint baseTransformName = Base servoAttachNodes = top servoSrfMeshNames = COL2 traverseVelocityLimits = 1, 30 hardMinMaxLimits = 0, 180 softMinMaxAngles = 0, 180 targetAngle = 0 modelInitialAngle = 0 inverted = false mirrorRotation = false maxMotorOutput = 50 driveSpringMutliplier = 100 driveDampingMutliplier = 20 motorizedMassPerKN = 0.0002 motorizedCostPerDriveUnit = 1 connectedMassScale = 1 efficiency = 0.75 baseResourceConsumptionRate = 0.02 referenceConsumptionVelocity = 180 jointParentRotation = 0,0,0,1 servoTransformRotation = 0,0,0,1 mainAxis = X useLimits = true } And the model hierarchy: (I have tried some other hierarchy layouts too, like another game object above the base mesh)
  12. Rodger
    I haven’t made any patches for RO, and I don’t use it myself so am unlikely to. If someone makes some I’d be happy to include them.
  13. Rodger
    It doesn't even have "PhysicsSignificance = 1" in the cfg, like the other small science parts, so it'll mess with the COM position so much.
  14. Rodger
    Looks like this breaks mods with fairings, until they edit the models to rename the base mesh to "Mesh". (and I'm guessing that'll be every mod with fairings... it's a weird name choice lol)
  15. Rodger
    Just updated to 0.5 with new 0.625 and 1.25m decoupler variants. Also tested in 1.10, and seems to work fine even with the same version of the dependencies.
  16. Rodger
    It seems to work well enough, at least mesh switching and node switching is working. My guess is the only possible issue would be drag cube stuff.
  17. Rodger
    You could use a standard .625 decoupler on the inside, but a switchable size truss decoupler would be cool yeah, I’ll put that on the probably list.
  18. Rodger
    V0.4 "The Shiny Update" out now!
  19. Rodger
    Haha, yeah I discovered basically all the stuff you said after I first posted that. Thanks for the excellent wiki! If you do implement adding Vessel.ControlLevel to Parameterized Toggle, I can probably make some patches for stock and restock probe cores. Also, I have a little mesh for an LED with a built in glow I could PR if you want: Though it's a little more complicated for people to use, as it's actually two meshes and materials - one with "Emissive/Specular" for a base LED, and a 2nd one with "Alpha/Translucent Additive" for the glow, which uses tint colour. Also only really works on a flat surface.
  20. Rodger
    V0.3 with the Duna Rotor part is out, download in OP. Changelog: New dual rotor part for light probes in light atmospheres, based on the NASA Mars Helicopter. Also a long variant of the single truss for the Duna rotor. Added Surface Sample experiment to the landing skid part (requires the Bumblebee Probe core on the same craft to work) Minor fixes to other parts
  21. Rodger
    For all your Duna flight needs: Haven't made any other parts to go with it, like side mount trusses, or a mini probe core, but just need to balance it and it can go in the next release. Probably in the next couple of days.
  22. Rodger
    It will probably send the curve out of whack, but if you change the 2nd line in the "atmCurve" from key = 0.4 0.2 1 1.166 to key = 0.1 0.2 1 1.166 It will probably work. Make sure to get both engine modules in each part (the high and low power versions) Also, a preview of something related: 1.2m Duna-class prop
  23. Rodger
    That’s a nice idea, I was kind of thinking about adding DMOS experiments to it, like the X-ray or bio core sample ones, but didn’t think about a stock one lol
  24. Rodger
    There's a reason the first helicopter drone we're sending to mars is only 1.8kg, not 450kg!
  25. Rodger
    This update made it so the props do activate on Duna now... But they won't do you much good. I will probably make a Duna prop, but not sure it'll fit onto the bumblebee core/trusses, as it would need to be bigger
×
×
  • Create New...