Jump to content

RealKerbal3x

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,063

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RealKerbal3x

  1. RealKerbal3x
    This is a Raptor that was removed from SN8 during its test campaign. Interesting.
  2. RealKerbal3x
    Unfortunately all of the snacks had already been eaten by a weird-looking cat.
  3. RealKerbal3x
    Here's a guide I would recommend for making parts, it guides you through the whole process without any expectation of previous experience: Good luck!
  4. RealKerbal3x
    Wow, fantastic!
  5. RealKerbal3x
    Starship tiles are mechanically attached, not glued like Shuttle tiles. That should help with tiles falling off. But stainless steel is pretty heat resistant on its own. I'm not sure a copper sheet under the tiles would be worth it when the steel should be able to just about handle it on its own.
  6. RealKerbal3x
    @Yeepsta There's this mod that allows free movement within spacecraft: Unfortunately, it was last updated almost 2 years ago, so I wouldn't hold out much hope for it to work in a more recent KSP version.
  7. RealKerbal3x
  8. RealKerbal3x
    This was actually a study NASA did for a crewed Venus mission. I don't think it got beyond pretty pictures and I have no idea how practical it would have been, but it's pretty cool nonetheless.
  9. RealKerbal3x
    Raptor SN50 being prepared for installation on Starship SN10:
  10. RealKerbal3x
    Look at those heat tiles on SN11!
  11. RealKerbal3x
    Kerbals can carry things, you just have to remove their jetpack and/or EVA chute to do it.
  12. RealKerbal3x
    Maybe, we don't know for sure.
  13. RealKerbal3x
    Make sure you're deploying them correctly - you can't deploy them through the new EVA construction mode, you have to put them in your kerbal's inventory and click the tiny white icon at the bottom left of the inventory slot. Also make sure you're deploying the parts with the right Kerbal profession - you need an engineer to deploy the central station and power parts, but you need a scientist for the experiments.
  14. RealKerbal3x
    A Raptor for SN10 has arrived!
  15. RealKerbal3x
    From Elon's tweets it really seemed like the issue was Raptor reliability. One of SN9's engines kept running perfectly up until impact anyway, so if there was something wrong with the propellant supply it would have to be localised to the plumbing for the specific engine that failed, and that seems less likely than an engine issue to me.
  16. RealKerbal3x
  17. RealKerbal3x
    I'm pretty sure the drifting issue is much better in 1.11.1. It's not completely fixed but it allows for much better accuracy.
  18. RealKerbal3x
    Looks like SN7.2 has sprung a leak.
  19. RealKerbal3x
    I think his communicator is nonfunctional. Or at least the ship's sensors can't detect it through this ion storm. @DunaManiac
  20. RealKerbal3x
    The definition of 'lost' is different in each case. SN9 was destroyed in an unintentional but certainly not unexpected mishap, SN5 is being deliberately scrapped, and SN7.2 is being deliberately tested to destruction. SN7.2 isn't a spacecraft anyway, it's a ground test article. So no, I don't think this would qualify for an obscure world record attempt.
  21. RealKerbal3x
    No, they don't really have anywhere they can get a good view from. This view is great though:
  22. RealKerbal3x
  23. RealKerbal3x
    SN7.2 venting.
  24. RealKerbal3x
    Some people suggested that when they started to cut up SN6. What remains of SN6 is now in the scrapyard.
  25. RealKerbal3x
    Starhopper is still used as a weather station and camera tower, so it probably won't be scrapped. SN2 may have been modified to be a water tank, so that might stick around too. SN5 and 6 were just laying around, taking up space.
×
×
  • Create New...