OrbitalManeuvers
Members-
Posts
1,590 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1,635 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
6,704 profile views
-
I tried yours as well, and it worked fine. So some of our module differences are for sure that my BDB is in sync with github, and yours - I believe - is the released version. Your craft had complaints about ModuleBDBDepthMask on my system, which means your parts came from the release, I think. Anyway - none of the module differences we had should affect this decoupler behavior you're seeing, afaik. I think, if anything, we've definitely narrowed everything down to some difference in our installs. Poop, I'm outta ideas for the moment.
-
huh, gettin weirder. hopefully others will chime in with ideas, too. did you have a chance to try my craft file? my only guess has to do with which nodes are attached where. or here's a good test to try - if you remove the SIV-B tank so the IU is the bottom-est piece, are you able to remove the LM descent engine without affecting anything else? (assuming the CM is the root)
-
No worries! I know how to find a handful or two of typical install problems, and you're good on that front, as far as I can tell. I made a couple tiny videos for you to show how it works for me, so we can at least compare something more concrete. I also uploaded the craft file I used and that link is below, too. Hopefully we can figure out what's up if you can identify something that looks different to what you're seeing.
-
My suggestion here is to narrow things down as much as possible. Like, if you take a stock probe core or capsule, and you put in on the payload adapter node, and launch this to the flight scene, are you able to decouple just sitting on the pad? If you can do this two part test, and it doesn't work, then there's something really fundamental going on, and your log file is still the best thing to share. Your last upload of it gives access errors, so no one has seen it since you removed the extra MM.
-
I believe this is the first thing you should try before anything else: 584 [LOG 08:52:15.765] [AddonLoader]: Instantiating addon 'ModuleManager' from assembly 'ModuleManager' 585 [LOG 08:52:15.765] [ModuleManager] Multiple copies of current version. Using the first copy. Version: 4.1.4.0 It's loading the wrong version, which it does when there are multiple copies. You must have only the latest copy of MM present.
-
idk if we're all talkin about the same things here, but in the video I posted on the previous page, right at 7 seconds, you can see the 3 panels separating. There are actually 3 shrouds on the engine.
- 22,637 replies
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
re: SoyuzV2 hot staging, here's how it's working for me ... numbers showing for comparison. Does get a heat bar for a moment, but no booms.
- 22,637 replies
-
- 1
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
yeah that's the exact reason I edit all the launch sites in KSRSS, especially the historical ones. Using MLP to build as historical as possible will often violate the footprint in the default values, so I've edited most of mine to have no size limits.
-
There's this, too: https://github.com/kochiBR/katniss-baikonour-for-KSRSS
- 22,637 replies
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Those parameters are editable via the KK editor UI. If you've never used it I'm not sure I can type out a full tutorial here, but let's try the major plot points: in the flight scene press Ctrl+K. find the launch pad in the local instances. click it and in the editor click Edit Launchsite. edit the obviously named values. use 0 for no limit. press save everywhere you can as you close windows. revert to vab. Idk whether that's all you have to do, or if you also need to close/reopen the launchsite with the KK button in the VAB. it might even get automatically closed when you edit it. to be safe, use the KK button in the VAB and find the launch site and close/reopen it. hope that helps!
-
This is awesome, thanks for the updates! I seem to have a new nit, though. I'm in sync with Github and finding that the pipe sliders aren't doing anything on the Atlas stand. Here the sliders are moved but the pipes are still in their default position. Just me?
- 2,291 replies
-
- launch pad
- saturn
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
[1.12.x] KRE - Kerbal Reusability Expansion
OrbitalManeuvers replied to Damon's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
I was able to reproduce this too. If I'm correct about the cause, there's not really anything you can do without a fix from the authors. I created a Github issue here: https://github.com/TundraMods/Kerbal-Reusability-Expansion/issues/5- 111 replies
-
- parts
- reusability
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with: