Jump to content

Maple Kerman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    215

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Maple Kerman

  1. Maple Kerman
    This is great!
  2. Maple Kerman
    Sweet, a PC building thread! @Kernel Kraken Like Elthy said above, B550 would probably be your best option for a motherboard, as it has most of the useful things that X570 has and costs less. If you are willing to give up Nvidia-exclusive features and pay an extra $80, I would also recommend getting an RX 6800. Double the memory and slightly better performance are worth it, alongside (hopefully) better availability. And yes, you should wait until prices settle and stuff is actually in stock.
  3. Maple Kerman
    It works in 1.10.x. Just uninstall Scatterer if it gives you issues.
  4. Maple Kerman
    I've got quite a bit of mods installed right now... Gameplay mods: [x] Science! Continued Better Time Warp Continued Dynamic Battery Storage ID Flags and Decals Kerbal Environmental Institute Kerbal Engineer Redux Kerbal Joint Reinforcement Continued Kerbal Alarm Clock Hide Empty Tech Tree Nodes Community Tech Tree Community Resource Pack Community Category Kit Community Terrain Texture Pack Custom Barn Kit Part mods: B9PartSwitch Cryogenic Engines CryoTanks Heat Control Kerbal Atomics Kerbal Planetary Base Systems Mark IV Spaceplane System Near Future Technologies (all) Restock Restock+ Stockalike Station Parts Expansion Redux Visual Mods: EVE-Redux Scatterer Stock Visual Enhancements PlanetShine Drop-In Replacement Textures Pood's Deep Nebula Skybox Planet mods: Kopernicus BE KittopiaTech Outer Planets Mod Minor Planets Expansion Helvica (my soon-to-be-released custom gas giant) You can never have too many mods!
  5. Maple Kerman
    Banned for not having a profile picture.
  6. Maple Kerman
    Yeah. I guess I'm just really attached to the stock system and OPM. Would be nice to be able to have all of these other planets and moons while leaving the stock system intact. That's why I like that GPP and some other system replacers have "secondary" versions.
  7. Maple Kerman
    Looking good! I would heavily desaturate the ocean, though.
  8. Maple Kerman
    Yeah, that's what I'm thinking of.
  9. Maple Kerman
    This seems really cool.
  10. Maple Kerman
    I know this idea is counterintuitive, since the whole point of the mod is to reorganize the planets and add new ones without having to travel too far, but is there any way to add the new planets and moons without changing the stock system much? If not, I wouldn't mind changing the configs myself to reorganize it how I'd like.
  11. Maple Kerman
    @Misguided_Kerbal I'm listening.
  12. Maple Kerman
    Good one. Ouch. I guess it's not that bad.
  13. Maple Kerman
    @Misguided_Kerbal Oh boy. I'm not a big fan of Macs (not that I have anything against Mac users), and performance is a big reason why. I'm glad it doesn't seem like it's stopped you, though.
  14. Maple Kerman
    Cool place. Judging from the high graphical quality of your screenshots, I'm guessing you've got a pretty good rig and a hefty amount of mods. What are your PC specs? (If you know them.)
  15. Maple Kerman
    Another minor planet pack in development... this is great! Might play around with this soon.
  16. Maple Kerman
    This is neat. Will definitely follow this thread, as I'm also starting to attempt developing my own Kopernicus planets. It's great to follow development up close!
  17. Maple Kerman
    @Minmus Taster It should be. I don't think KS3P needs configs for each planet, the same way EVE or Scatterer do.
  18. Maple Kerman
    @killerbaby1337Yes, just make sure you use Kopernicus Continued for 1.9.1.
  19. Maple Kerman
    This is so useful. Thank you @Poodmund!
  20. Maple Kerman
    @OhioBob Thanks.
  21. Maple Kerman
    Don't know if this is the right place to ask this, but... Regarding configs for bodies, are timewarpAltitudeLimits values still needed? Or is that redundant?
  22. Maple Kerman
    So, I've been playing around with SVE again, and found that it actually works great with the newest version of Scatterer in 1.10.1, despite the older configs (at least, it does on my install). Even the OPM planets work fine. I guess this makes it my visual mod of choice for now, since it looks great and I don't need to worry about Scatterer compatibility. (It's also supported by a hefty number of planet packs, which is a nice bonus.)
  23. Maple Kerman
    @OhioBob That really clears things up, thanks again.
  24. Maple Kerman
    So, inside the base folder of your mod, make a "LICENSE.txt" or "LICENSE.md" file. Find the license text of a license of your choice. As an example, here are the license texts for the MIT license and the GPLv3 license. Paste the entire text into the LICENSE file, and save it. (make sure to insert the year and your username at the beginning of the MIT license). Your mod now has a license. (Make sure to put the name of the license in your forum post somewhere, and where applicable on websites like Spacedock if you ever use them.)
  25. Maple Kerman
    Oh, never mind about that, then. I have the stock system with both OPM and MPE added, nothing else. (I plan to install "secondary" GEP.) I assume Soden's orbit is made smaller due to how far out it goes. That's all I needed. Thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...