-
Posts
4,406 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by Wjolcz
-
Same. Seriously, people should calm down about the plane parts. I mean, I'm not really excited about the big 2.5m Turbofan and don't see much use for it, but "Juno" and "Panther" are something I will find 100% useful, especially on Laythe. Also the "Juno" engine looks like something light enough to move around with KIS/KAS installed, so that's a plus too.
-
Check the 4th pic of the album where it shows all the stats. There's the KER HUD showing the Ap and Pe. It says it's a 72kmx71km orbit. EDIT: This one somewhere around here VVVVVVV
- 3,149 replies
-
- spaceplane
- k-prize
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
I think the amount of parts for planes and rockets is pretty well balanced actually. We have only 3 air-breathing engines and like 15 LFO engines (not counting the "Puff" and the LV-N for obvious reasons). People say we have too many plane parts, because there are so many fuel tanks (and wing pieces) dedicated for planes only. There are separate LF and LFO tanks, which is kind of silly in my opinion. We could simply get a fuel switch tweakable and cut the amount of tanks in half.
-
Which one looks nicer; new Mk1 cockpit or old one
Wjolcz replied to Falkenherz's topic in KSP1 Discussion
The new one is far better IMO. -
anshortage of Atmospheric bodies
Wjolcz replied to Rocket Farmer's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Sorry to say that, but you seem to defend your 'magical jet' idea too hard. It's really not a good thing to have jets running on oxygen and oxygenless atmospheres. It could be compared to a rocket engine that is upgraded to a point where it almost doesn't consume any fuel and yet it maintains the same level of max thrust. -
anshortage of Atmospheric bodies
Wjolcz replied to Rocket Farmer's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Why not both? Electric props and ISRU converter able to make fuel out of atmosphere? Electric propeller is still a better idea than magical jet engines. Also the text mentions CO2 to be non-toxic, not NO2. -
anshortage of Atmospheric bodies
Wjolcz replied to Rocket Farmer's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
CO2 is a safe, non-cryogenic, non-toxic oxidizer. non-toxic oxidizer non-toxic WHO WROTE THIS!? Wouldn't that be simply ISRU? I'm really badly educated when it comes to chemistry, so can anyone confirm those 'fuels' (B2H6, B5H9, SiH4, LiBH4, Al(BH4)3, H2, Mg, NH3 or N2H4) would burn (when combined with gaseous CO2) in a way that would allow for controlled combustion? I still think that electric propellers are the way to go. EDIT: So looks like it's possible (at least with hydrogen): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabatier_reaction -
anshortage of Atmospheric bodies
Wjolcz replied to Rocket Farmer's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
That already exists in War Thunder and is called stallinium or stalinwood. I'm afraid SQUAD would get sued after implementing something like this. -
One of my Jool missions kraken'd! AGAIN!
Wjolcz replied to Wjolcz's topic in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)
OK, so it seems I found another workaround for this kind of Kraken. If the same happens to you do this: Let's say you have two spacecraft: X (which is orbiting in interplanetary space but much closer to the Sun) and Y (which is on it's way to Jool). 1. Choose the vessel X from the Tracking Station (when loading it the camera will slide right onto the craft. Not sure what's the deal with that. Probably coming back from scaring off krakens and other space whales) 2. Open the map view 3. Switch to vessel Y Viola! That way your Jool mission won't get eaten by NaN. Seems like the game has some sort of problem with interplanetary vessel positioning, or whatever, after your save loads for the first time in the session. -
One of my Jool missions kraken'd! AGAIN!
Wjolcz replied to Wjolcz's topic in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)
The thing happened to me again with yet another spacecraft. Something's seriously wrong with space between Dres and Jool orbits. Seems like the Kraken likes to lurk there a lot. -
Numerical readout for Rep at KSC
Wjolcz replied to John FX's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I agree. -
Aerobraking at Jool, still possible in 1.04?
Wjolcz replied to johnnyhandsome's topic in KSP1 Discussion
I don't know about you, but from my experience in 1.0 the Jool atmosphere is instant death for anything that touches it. -
Doors: Now With GPP!
Wjolcz replied to Moesly_Armlis's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Not like it's really needed, but would be nice to have a spawn option for them there. -
anshortage of Atmospheric bodies
Wjolcz replied to Rocket Farmer's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
Exactly. -
Making KAS and Robotic parts Stock
Wjolcz replied to seb-eisdrache's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
I don't know about hinges and rotating parts, but I would love to see a full implementation of KIS+KAS into stock. -
What parts would you like to see in KSP?
Wjolcz replied to Snikersnee's topic in KSP1 Suggestions & Development Discussion
An electric ducted fan. -
I'm not gonna lie I have no idea what that is. The KSP Winter Owl is a stock flag you can choose when starting your career save.
-
You could just upload them to sketchfab
-
Same. The hatch on the Mk1-2 is really annoying to build around. There's always a chute, or battery blocking the hatch. It would be better to have all the hatches symmetrically placed. Even if it doesn't make much sense. I don't have any problems with other crew-holding parts because they are (shocker, i know! ) symmetrical. Anything placed on those looks good and works good, so I don't see the reason for hatches to be weridly-placed like on MK1-2. Edit: is there such a thing as "build around"? Because I think I made it up.
-
[1.12.x] Kerbal Alarm Clock v3.13.0.0 (April 10)
Wjolcz replied to TriggerAu's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Cool. Thanks a lot.