Jump to content

NathanKell

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,406

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NathanKell

  1. NathanKell
    The game being in alpha is a bit of a laugh; on one level it's obviously true, but on another--first it goes to QA, then to experimentals, then to release. That's as much testing as patches for gone-gold games get. The folder renaming has its downsides, but IMO (as pointed out) they are outweighed tremendously by the upsides. Further, I want to make a general point: Squad should always, always, always feel free to break mods for the sake of improvement. Indeed, the reverse (preserving bad things for "mod compatibility") has been a problem, and Squad should be *thanked* for escaping that model.
  2. NathanKell
    The loader has two relevant bugs: 1. TGA files are not compressed to DXT (hence take up 4x to 6x more memory than they should) 2. Some PNG files do not get mipmaps generated (some do? Confusing). Both bugs are fixed by Active Texture Management, and the Basic version does not scale texture size and therefore leaves quality unaffected.
  3. NathanKell
    cBBp: yes. It's to no longer use the workaround for the bug (that was itself buggy on revert). MODEL nodes and rescaleFactor work correctly now.
  4. NathanKell
    Why on earth would a *part* mod ruin anybody's save?
  5. NathanKell
    Moved. Also took the liberty of tweaking the title for clarity; please re-edit as you see fit.
  6. NathanKell
    I'm not really seeing a way either Even if you add to all then remove from batteries...how do you select only batteries?
  7. NathanKell
    Quite possibly; some of the paths changed.
  8. NathanKell
    And if .25 Win x64 were as stable as .24, we wouldn't have locked things down. It's not.
  9. NathanKell
    As Chris says (I also had access) 0.25 Winx64 is far, far, far less stable than 0.24. If it had been as stable as .24, we almost certainly would not have disabled Winx64 support in our mods. The reason for MM inclusion is because none of us know whether users will use more than one mod; one *never* wants to release a mod that lacks required files.
  10. NathanKell
    Got tweakable wing mass/strength working. Pull request sent to ferram. Evidence:
  11. NathanKell
    Sounds like a bad download, maybe? Certainly getting no issue here, and no one else has reported a problem.
  12. NathanKell
    try changing autoCutSpeed to -1 ?
  13. NathanKell
    That's absolutely fine (and frankly easier for us ) I just wanted to be sure we were doing your favored approach.
  14. NathanKell
    What are you talking about? RSS and Realism Overhaul gets, like, a thousand downloads a release. We *love* your stuff!
  15. NathanKell
    Assuming your entry costs are all "as desired" and you're not using MODEL on any Squad parts (paths changed) that should be it for partmods.
  16. NathanKell
    Stick with 2.4.5.
  17. NathanKell
    Well, that's a shame. I'll deal with it as soon as I can, not really sure why it's doing that.
  18. NathanKell
    Sent. 10char.
  19. NathanKell
    NP. 10char...
  20. NathanKell
    NoMrBond: in .24, we tried just a warning. It didn't work. Heck, people ignore CompatabilityChecker warnings all the time, even when it's about shifting KSP versions, not just x86-x64 stuff! That's why a lot of us moved to, finally, actually lock stuff down on CC check fail. You can look back at my posts on the CC thread where I was arguing against doing so. Sadly, I was proven wrong.
  21. NathanKell
    Not criticizing, just clarifying! BTW--not sure you got my PM a ways back. Would you prefer it if RO included the actual assets, with very explicit licensing, or as now asked people to come here to download the pack (at the risk of posting on this thread)?
  22. NathanKell
    You should coordinate with WolfGeek101, here. Also, the notice I put in her/his thread (about licenses) applies here as well.
  23. NathanKell
    Cool! I take it that's all cfg changes?
  24. NathanKell
    Huh! Interesting. Also, your dropbox link is dead. It's your personal link, not a public/shared link.
  25. NathanKell
    sumghai: that's great! Thanks so much for doing the detailed testing (that I kinda figured you already had, but had to ask). Editing. (Diazo, also relevant) newlive: Precise Node has the same issue Toolbar does: there's an issue with how nlizzy is getting his compatibility info, it will be resolved shortly (aka tomorrow, probably). He has cleared them both for .25, but due to changes in CompatibilityChecker that isn't being reported. magico, Starstrider42, RoverDude: thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...