-
Posts
4,585 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by GoldForest
-
I'm not sure if IR can be substituted for BG.
- 22,648 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Great work! Now on to the lander! Also, I wish there was a way to make robotic parts act like animations (I.e. Wheels, solar panels, etc) when robotics aren't installed. I have BG, but I know some to a lot of people don't, and thus will miss out on your great parts.
- 22,648 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- totm march 2020
- mod
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Looks like you have all the mods dependencies. Tons of FreeIVA nullrefs, which may be the problem, I don't know. You have the latest version, so not sure how to fix that. I don't see anything that stands out to me. Of course, I'm not an experienced bug hunter either. @Rodger might be able to help you. Oh, are you selecting an interactable IVA for Gemini and Apollo? Both come with multiple IVAs.
-
Copy/Grab your: KSP.log (Found in the main directory next to the .exe file.) ModuleManager.log (Found in the Logs folder) ModuleManager.configcache (Found in your gamedata) Zip/Rar them together Then upload them to a file sharing site like Github or Dropbox or GoogleDrive. Then post a link to the download here so we can take a look.
-
Inb4 Cobalt gets 50 pings asking for Titan LRBs to be added. One of those ping hypothetically being from me... 11.5 ft? That's about 3.5 meters (Rounded down from 3.5052) or in KSP scale, 2.1875 meters. Which is actually one of the niche half size scales. Cobalt, if you actually make this, please use 2.1875. You already use the other niche sizes like 0.9375 and 1.5.
-
May 29th, 2030 Enter the Void ROSS Module 2, 3 and 4 Flown by Progress and Angara A7 ROSS Modules 2 (Basically Prichal), 3 (Basically an extended Pirs) and 4 (Science airlock module kind of like Nauka, but way less bulky) added to LSISS. Decided to do all three modules in one launch. Full album: Imgur: The magic of the Internet
-
To be fair, Thor's team rapidly expanded upon it. Stretched tanks, SRB boosters, etc. Thor's slightly smaller size also probably played a role. They could get more performance out of LR79 engine with Thor than Jupiter due to Jupiter being a tad bit wider than Thor, almost .3 meters wider, which doesn't sound like a lot, but that adds a lot of volume to the tankage. Juno IV was promising until Atlas showed up. Juno V technically was created. Saturn I is just a renamed Juno V, due to Von Braun wanting Juno V to be in differentiated from Jupiter/Juno II. Hmmm. If the Juno name was kept, what would Saturn V be as a Juno? Juno VI? Also, I found these images of Juno V considerations. It's interesting to see that they kept the 8-engine layout with all the designs. I'm guessing the F-1 wasn't even thought of at the time of Juno V's conceptualization? IDK why they didn't go with one of the two monolithic tank designs. Yes, I know why, I just don't understand why. Like, yes, you have the tooling to make the Thor and Redstone tanks, but wouldn't it cost more to go with a multi-tank design, not to mention heavier stage overall, than a monolithic tank? Sorry, tangent. Ignore everything past the IDK. Also, the clustered second tank is so Kerbal. KJR and auto-struts. And if you think the "Narhal" picture is funny, you should see the payload picture.