CobaltWolf Posted February 2, 2018 Author Share Posted February 2, 2018 36 minutes ago, davidy12 said: No real plume for AJ-260. VenomousRequiem is no longer around to make RP configs. We need more volunteers for cleaning up and updating our config files! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadet_BNSF Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 Congrats on TOTM! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidy12 Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 First congrats on TOTM, but second, may I ask what is the Dnoces A-2 supposed to represent? HG-3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimothyC Posted February 2, 2018 Share Posted February 2, 2018 5 hours ago, davidy12 said: First congrats on TOTM, but second, may I ask what is the Dnoces A-2 supposed to represent? HG-3? An evolved J-2, such as is seen in ETS by the mid-late 1990s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kerbal01 Posted February 3, 2018 Share Posted February 3, 2018 Hey, I won't have to go hunting for this thread now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strozyk85 Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 Congratulations on your astonishing mod @CobaltWolf Keep up the good work man!I have a question: is there a way to move some BDB parts inside the tech tree? I'm currently using Unmanned Before Manned and Unmanned Before Manned Challenge and I would like to modify my tech tree in order to match my idea of a perfect Space Agency Campaign? (I'm using community tech tree) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 4, 2018 Author Share Posted February 4, 2018 5 hours ago, strozyk85 said: Congratulations on your astonishing mod @CobaltWolf Keep up the good work man!I have a question: is there a way to move some BDB parts inside the tech tree? I'm currently using Unmanned Before Manned and Unmanned Before Manned Challenge and I would like to modify my tech tree in order to match my idea of a perfect Space Agency Campaign? (I'm using community tech tree) Hmmm, sounds like a Module Manager question. Afraid I don't know more than that. Some work from this morning; one thing I'd like to get out of the next update if finish the long standing revamps that started over a year ago. The expanded Gemini and MOL parts are some of the more egregious examples remaining in the mod. Some people have told me they'd like another MOL Lab that properly fits into a 1.875m profile, anyone else like that idea? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notJebKerman Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 40 minutes ago, CobaltWolf said: Some work from this morning; one thing I'd like to get out of the next update if finish the long standing revamps that started over a year ago. The expanded Gemini and MOL parts are some of the more egregious examples remaining in the mod. Some people have told me they'd like another MOL Lab that properly fits into a 1.875m profile, anyone else like that idea? It is a good idea but I think that revamp of the current parts should be a priority. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderMan Posted February 4, 2018 Share Posted February 4, 2018 1.875cm version? good idea, but it'd be best to finish off any outstanding parts in the MOL partset first.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pappystein Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, CobaltWolf said: Hmmm, sounds like a Module Manager question. Afraid I don't know more than that. Some work from this morning; one thing I'd like to get out of the next update if finish the long standing revamps that started over a year ago. The expanded Gemini and MOL parts are some of the more egregious examples remaining in the mod. Some people have told me they'd like another MOL Lab that properly fits into a 1.875m profile, anyone else like that idea? Yes a resize of the parts you are refreshing to a "true" 1.875m would be appreciated. Edited February 5, 2018 by Pappystein Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wahgineer Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 @CobaltWolfflush MOL parts are a definite go, but after you finish the other stuff (basically, what everyone else is saying) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 On 2/4/2018 at 4:20 PM, notJebKerman said: It is a good idea but I think that revamp of the current parts should be a priority. On 2/4/2018 at 4:33 PM, RaiderMan said: 1.875cm version? good idea, but it'd be best to finish off any outstanding parts in the MOL partset first.. On 2/4/2018 at 7:27 PM, Pappystein said: Yes a resize of the parts you are refreshing to a "true" 1.875m would be appreciated. On 2/5/2018 at 12:30 AM, awsumindyman said: @CobaltWolfflush MOL parts are a definite go, but after you finish the other stuff (basically, what everyone else is saying) It's nice to have consensus for once! Alrighty then, I'll keep going with these revamps. One thing I would like to do sooner rather than later is put the Gemini stuff (MOL, Gemini Lander, and Big G) 'to bed' so that I can move forward without feeling that I've 'forgotten it'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawnDartLeo Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 On 10/3/2016 at 11:16 AM, CobaltWolf said: Yes. It's a product of trying to get the convex colliders to not clip the engines. Since the colliders are low poly, they are moved out so they don't clip. (Think of a perfect circle, then a hexagon circumscribed around it). @Abrecan nice attempt! Sorry for all the extra mesh crap on the lander. When did you last update BDB? I don't think the Apollo has had those style RCS ports on the capsule since before the beta lock. So the ullage motors not contacting the interstage is a thing... and I should just move past this minor visual bug-a-boo and get to the Mun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 20 minutes ago, LawnDartLeo said: So the ullage motors not contacting the interstage is a thing... and I should just move past this minor visual bug-a-boo and get to the Mun. Hmm, yes. I forgot that's still an issue. Y'know what, I'll log an issue on Github. See if I can't reduce the issue a bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wahgineer Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 3 hours ago, LawnDartLeo said: So the ullage motors not contacting the interstage is a thing... and I should just move past this minor visual bug-a-boo and get to the Mun. Just use the Translate Editor Gizmo to slide them over so that they're flush with the interstage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawnDartLeo Posted February 6, 2018 Share Posted February 6, 2018 Konfused... I'll have to Google that. If I have any questions, I'll post back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 6, 2018 Author Share Posted February 6, 2018 20 minutes ago, LawnDartLeo said: Konfused... I'll have to Google that. If I have any questions, I'll post back. I'll try and clarify. It is entirely a visual issue - the rocket will work fine. I will take a look at it now with fresh eyes and try to fix it. In other news, DEV STREAM STARTING NOW on Twitch. Going to be working on MOL updates, maybe canoodle with some of the one-off parts that I forgot in the last update. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Kerman Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 lol what's with the A/V cable connector? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rock3tman_ Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Obviously so they can play N64. Those long station stays get stressful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderMan Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 the second he puts in usb and or hdmi..I'm going to...ahem...requisition use of...the component for a station craft of my own XD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaverickSawyer Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 3 hours ago, Drew Kerman said: lol what's with the A/V cable connector? Nonsense. Those are clearly power supply ports... Although why the Kerbals continue to use Yellow to indicate ground is beyond me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 10 hours ago, Drew Kerman said: lol what's with the A/V cable connector? 8 hours ago, Rock3tman_ said: Obviously so they can play N64. Those long station stays get stressful 8 hours ago, RaiderMan said: the second he puts in usb and or hdmi..I'm going to...ahem...requisition use of...the component for a station craft of my own XD. 6 hours ago, MaverickSawyer said: Nonsense. Those are clearly power supply ports... Although why the Kerbals continue to use Yellow to indicate ground is beyond me. The honest answer? @IronCretin put them on his Vostok Continued and I liked it a lot and it went into my toolbox as a shorthand greeble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LawnDartLeo Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 (edited) @CobaltWolf ... the konfusion is with what @awsumindyman posted... translate editor gizmo. I am not sure what that is or if it is part of the VAB or editor extended. It's not a function I am familiar with. Clarification appreciated if any can be offered. Always like to learn so I have to do less brute forcing. Edited February 7, 2018 by LawnDartLeo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobaltWolf Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, LawnDartLeo said: @CobaltWolf ... the konfusion is with what @awsumindyman posted... translate editor gizmo. I am not sure what that is or if it is part of the VAB or editor extended. It's not a function I am familiar with. Clarification appreciated if any can be offered. Always like to learn so I have to do less brute forcing. The feature in the VAB where you can move something after placing it? It's the second of the 4 buttons at the top left of the viewer in the VAB. You can pull it up by pressing '2' on your keyboard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.