Forum no-nos

[cubinator]

92: numbering posts incorrectly.

[Ozymandias_the_Goat]

93. Numbering Posts almost incorrectly.

94. Redundancy

95. Even logging on to the forums at all during this beautiful summer...

96. Going on the Forums in front of your boss.

97. Posting "Redundancy" three times in the "Forum no-nos thread".

98. Realizing you fell asleep browsing the forums.

99. Asking meaningful questions about life, as the answer is obviously 42. 

100. <Self Explanatory> 100!

[Dman979]

101. seeing every +/- 100 as part of the Number war thread.

[Xavven]

102. Saying you've downgraded to an earlier version because the current version is deficient

[Robotengineer]

103. Having a forum game in the Kerbal Network section. (What is this if not a forum game?)

[Dman979]

16 hours ago, Robotengineer said:

103. Having a forum game in the Kerbal Network section. (What is this if not a forum game?)

It's a list of no-nos, duh. Actually, besides some of the sarcasm, it's a fairly helpful guide to being a good community member.

104. Saying that Squad NEEDS to add X or change Y.

[Guest]

105.  Asking the forum admins to make a change that can only be made by the IPS people.

106.  Not finishing a sentence like that time that I forgot to

107.  Making a new thread to reply to another.

Edited July 11, 2016 by Guest

[Red Iron Crown]

108. Hitting "Report" instead of "Reply", then putting your response in the report text. (Happens all the time.)

[Superfluous J]

109. Answering a list of "what mods would you suggest for this specific thing" with the same old list of mods you use for everything, regardless of if they are actually useful for the specific thing requested.

[cubinator]

14 minutes ago, Red Iron Crown said:

108. Hitting "Report" instead of "Reply", then putting your response in the report text. (Happens all the time.)

110. Reporting a thread to move it to a particular subforum, then realizing it's already in that subforum.  

[Corona688]

111. "First!"

[EdusacconBR]

112. Asking for rep  

[Mister Dilsby]

113. Admitting you care about rep...especially if you already have a stupid amount of it. What?

[Atlas2342]

114. Pinging Mr. @Kuzzter in Guess Who Will Reply Next.

[Ozymandias_the_Goat]

115. Posting a reply just when I am writing mine.

[SpaceplaneAddict]

116. 5char.

[adsii1970]

117. Making forum rules for the sole purpose of adding to a thread...

[SpaceplaneAddict]

117: Being non friendly

 

[HoloYolo]

118. Making joke posts on any other date other than April 1st.

[Liarra Sniffles]

119. Creating an account specifically to add to a joke thread.

120. Lying about creating an account specifically to add to a joke thread.

121. Calling it a joke thread.

[Columbia]

122. *Not* having Scatterer when posting pictures in the Spacecraft Exchange.

123: Having an opinion other than "The console versions are a waste of time and will turn out crappy."

124. "I mean, 1.1 wasn't that buggy."

125. Having a company banner more than a single megapixel.

126. Attempting to start a discussion thread about something in 1.1 (People will see it as a complaint thread and treat it like so.)

127. Using "SQUAD" and "" or "" in the same post.

128. "Honestly, KSP not just being about rockets is good."

129. Failing to take account that all atmospheric aircraft builders are scrubs and rocket builders are superior.

130. Asking to add a part for planes.

131. Stock is and always will be superior to Modded craft, regardless of functions and aesthetics.

Okay, that was extraordinarily long.

 

 

[Atlas2342]

132. Posting extraordinarily long replies. 

[Ruedii]

On 7/17/2016 at 2:58 PM, Atlas2342 said:

132. Posting extraordinarily long replies. 

I do not see what is wrong with posting extraordinary long replies.   Sometimes a lot of stuff needs to be said, and you can't say it in a few words.  In those cases making extraordinarily long posts should be fine. It's not like you are going off on a tangent and talking about things completely off topic like tomatoes are a berry not a vegetable and by the standard that deemed them a vegetable asparagus would be a fruit or bringing inflammatory topics, like how Linux is better than Windows, and EMACs is for old fashioned nerds into the mix, or [snipped political joke].   We all know better than to do things like that.   After all we all play a game that relates to orbital mechanics and rocket science.   There is no real reason we shouldn't be able to post long essays as replies.  

Edited July 19, 2016 by Vanamonde
Please don't digress into politics.

[Atlas2342]

3 hours ago, Ruedii said:

 *a long and well-thought out explaination*

I know, I wasn't really being serious. But, I mean so is this thread right? 

[Ruedii]

Just now, Atlas2342 said:

I know, I wasn't really being serious. But, I mean so is this thread right? 

Sure, my reply was very serious . . .

133:  Forgetting to put smiley faces after being sarcastic.