Jump to content

SpaceDock.info (Mod Hosting Site)


VITAS

Recommended Posts

Now it starts to be crazy.

Local FireFox 131.0.3: No problem.

FireFox from the DbServer (Server, who is used with check-your-website), 132.0.1: Problem - "Gesicherte Verbindung fehlgeschlagen" (same as older)

Local Download (old own tool):

D:\temp>download http://spacedock.info/ -h
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 2445
Cache-Control: no-store
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:00:13 GMT
Location: https://spacedock.info/
Server: 52K-CDN
Via: http/1.1 localhost (52K)

Status: 301 MovedPermanently

195,99 milliseconds
0,20 seconds

D:\temp>download https://spacedock.info/ -h
Vary: Cookie,Accept-Encoding
Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()
Age: 0
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Length: 26198
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:00:15 GMT
Set-Cookie: session=; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=0; Secure; HttpOnly; Path=/; SameSite=Lax
Server: 52K-CDN
Via: 1.1 spacedock.info, http/1.1 localhost (52K)

Status: 200 OK

302,67 milliseconds
0,30 seconds

No problem connecting http + https.

Same from the DbServer (with a small older Download)

e:\sd-db>download http://spacedock.info/ -h
Connection: keep-alive
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 2445
Cache-Control: no-store
Content-Type: text/html
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:25:53 GMT
Location: https://spacedock.info/
Server: 52K-CDN
Via: http/1.1 localhost (52K)

Status: 301 MovedPermanently

e:\sd-db>download https://spacedock.info/ -h
Error (1): The request was aborted: Could not create SSL/TLS secure channel.
SecureChannelFailure
3

The 3 indicates, that the server doesn't send a complete answer.

Same server, with a newer download: No Problem!

e:\sd-db\temp>download http://spacedock.info/ -h
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:27:23 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
Via: http/1.1 localhost (52K)
Server: 52K-CDN
Cache-Control: no-store
Location: https://spacedock.info/
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Language: en
Content-Length: 2445

Status: 301 MovedPermanently

184.87 milliseconds
0.18 seconds

e:\sd-db\temp>download https://spacedock.info/ -h
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 14:27:25 GMT
Server: 52K-CDN
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 26198
Vary: Cookie,Accept-Encoding
Set-Cookie: session=; Expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT; Max-Age=0; Secure; HttpOnly; Path=/; SameSite=Lax
Via: 1.1 spacedock.info, http/1.1 localhost (52K)
Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()
Age: 0
Connection: keep-alive

Status: 200 OK

285.21 milliseconds
0.29 seconds

That's completely crazy, never seen such a difference between two own download - versions.

Rechecked your ip address. There is an "Accelerator" on your ip address - https://95.217.59.158/

Is there the SSL connection termination? If yes, is it possible do deactivate that tool (temporary)?

Manual rechecked with the command inside check-your-website: No problem, no error. Normally, if download fails, check-your-website fails too. That would indicate a SSL problem, because the command line tool and the code of check-your-website use the same Windows - SSL - libraries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

Firefox developer here.

We received Bug 1928600 - spacedock.info - "Secure connection failed" when accessing the page  and diagnosed that it's triggered by SETTINGS_NO_RFC7540_PRIORITIES from RFC 9218 Extensible Prioritization Scheme for HTTP.
What I'm seeing in wireshark is that Firefox is sending this in the HTTP/2 SETTINGS packet, and spacedock.info is sending a GOAWAY with PROTOCOL_ERROR(1).

Is this error coming from the CDN or the target server?

For Firefox users out there, you can avoid it by setting `network.http.http2.send_NO_RFC7540_PRI` to false in about:config.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

was on an event showing off ksp.

 

i will investugate how i can implement a fix in apache traffic server sinc its the one that does the client https connection.

if anyone wants to gi ahead and suggest ats settings to change/put in youre welcome.

ndSKiZaDVUIbsvHNeIdmwkBd

 

p.s. is this forum flake too? i had a hard time posting all threse webserver errors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least my site isnt the only one then.

 

so my plan is to open an issue with apache traffic server refering to the mozilla one. i cant find anything that fixes my issue in the ats docs.

i also need a way to deploy the latest ats version as lxc. i cant update to the latest ubuntu lts ver in the lxc on proxmox. it wont boot. so any idears in that department on how get a distro (any that has lxc templates in proxmox) to get  ats 10 running?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update on the FF132 issue:

short version for non technical persons: its an avalance of work to get th^is going but i have an idea what to try.

 

longer version for eggheads

- the ats (apache traffic server) issue i opened after getting poitners form the mozilla issue told me to get an more up to date ats version.

- im runnign ats 8.x now and need to jump at least to 9.x or even 10.x

- ubuntu/debian are to oldschool to have these package versions.

- fedora 41 server has 9.2 with 9.6 in rawhide (testing) and 10.0.2 in submission to testing but non of the needed extra plugins. (i would need to compile them on my own)

- alpine linux has 9.2.5 in testing and all the plugins but im new to that distro and feel a bit uneasy using stuff from testing in critical prod envs.

- in any case jumping by 1-2 major versions will have me redo all the folders ull of config files (thy switched from "strange" to yaml)

- im not home till the end of the week and need to have at least a day of sitting down rewriting and debugging stuff to get this working.

- i do thinking about compiling stuff on my own like in the olden days but id wish i could use package managers to keep things up to date.

 

more advancements by mid next week is my guess

 

im rooting for firefox and feel sad for not allowing its current version on my sites but it has to wait.

 

any help with these issues: e.g finding rpm packets of the plugins for ats 9.2.5 or rpms for newer traffic servers would be great.

you can also join the chat (link on spacedock) to pitch in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2024 at 6:10 AM, VITAS said:

im rooting for firefox and feel sad for not allowing its current version on my sites but it has to wait.

Deactivating temporarily http/2 and serving only 1.1 would not be a viable workaround?

Long time ago, Safari was the one getting some heat due http2 and they worked around the problem by deactivating http2 on nginx.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, omegalex said:

Whenever I try to enter spacedock nothing happens. Clicking on links that lead to spacedock leave a blank browser page. Am I the only one having this issue?

It's working fine for me, Win 11 chrome. What OS/browser are you using?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blank page problem is fixed.

If its not for you try shift +click reload button.

was quite a journey. the details are in my last posts.

if you still have problems please tell me here.

 

tech mumbo jumbo:

i updated ates to 9.x. i had a temp problem with in between apache webserver throwing 400 errors. i had to fix it too and now it seems to do  what it supposed to. i still need to iron out some stuff from mighrating all the old config entries to the new files and strucutres in ats. also 10.x got released so theres that as well as http/3 support to implement.

Edited by VITAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you might need to flush your cache. as i said shipf-click your reload button or refer to your browsers help on how to get the site loaded and not just displayed from cache.
If youre still having problems please give me more details so i can debug it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi,

you are right its about 1Mbit/s up. Thats why to little for the bandwidth and load the setup has.
I will look into this.

 

Update: seems to be the reverse proxy. Im unsure as of know why it behaves that way.
is the problem new?

Edited by VITAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, VITAS said:

Hi,

you are right its about 1Mbit/s up. Thats why to little for the bandwidth and load the setup has.
I will look into this.

 

Update: seems to be the reverse proxy. Im unsure as of know why it behaves that way.
is the problem new?

It’s been like this for a while. As in, maybe since…

‘last month?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that might coincide with me updating the reverse proxy. Thank you for the pointer.

 

Small update: i havent found the cause yet. Im still on it.
While you wait see it as retro. Vintage (DSL)modem speeds :P

Edited by VITAS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...