Jump to content

TAC Fuel Balancer-DISCONTINUED

TaranisElsu

By TaranisElsu
in KSP1 Mod Releases

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
razark

razark

Posted
Posted
Iny news about how it's work in version 1.05?

I haven't had any issues yet in 1.0.5, but I've only done some light testing.

Don't be afraid. Install it, test it, find out for yourself. Make a scratch install of KSP for testing mods on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
Posted
On 9/21/2015, 2:09:09, AdamMil said:
sardia said:
Were your changes ever incorporated? It doesn't look like it.

TaranisElsu seems to have disappeared. :-P He hasn't been in the forums for a long time, and he didn't reply to my message either. EDIT: I just checked and he posted recently to say "I am still around. Been busy with other things though..."

Has this been tested with 1.0.5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stone Blue

Stone Blue

Posted
Posted (edited)

I havent really run it thru its paces testing every aspect of it, but I've been using 2.5.1.7 in several 1.0.4 AND 1.0.5 installs, both Linux AND Windows, from fresh, 1 or 2 mod stock installs, to heavily modded, and havent had even a hiccup...Seems to be be doing everything I ask it to, like its supposed to... So I would say yes for 1.0.5... ???

Edited by Stone Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
AdamMil

AdamMil

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 1/13/2016 at 4:55 AM, Rasip said:

Maybe mine is busted. In 1.0.5 with version 2.5.1.7 most functions work, but not the edit ability.

Are you trying it on the ground? Editing only works when landed, and possibly only on Kerbin.

On 12/12/2015 at 2:58 PM, linuxgurugamer said:

Has this been tested with 1.0.5?

I haven't specifically tested my customized version with 1.0.5, but if the official version works (which I expect it will) then so should mine.

Edited by AdamMil
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
Posted
On 1/19/2016 at 0:24 AM, AdamMil said:

Are you trying it on the ground? Editing only works when landed, and possibly only on Kerbin.

I haven't specifically tested my customized version with 1.0.5, but if the official version works (which I expect it will) then so should mine.

@AdamMil,

Do you have this customized version up in Github yet?  I would suggest forking the original and then saving your changes there, would make it easy to push back to the original

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AdamMil

AdamMil

Posted
Posted
On 1/29/2016 at 5:22 AM, linuxgurugamer said:

@AdamMil,

Do you have this customized version up in Github yet?  I would suggest forking the original and then saving your changes there, would make it easy to push back to the original

No, and since I dislike git I'd probably have used Bitbucket, but for "pushing back to the original" you're right that using git would make that easier. But if that happened, it would mean TaranisElsu would be around and maybe I could avoid maintaining a fork in the first place. :-)

On 1/29/2016 at 6:13 AM, Stone Blue said:

@AdamMil What latest version of TAC FB is your version built from, if you dont mind my asking?... (For backward compatability info...)

It was based on 2.5.1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, AdamMil said:

No, and since I dislike git I'd probably have used Bitbucket, but for "pushing back to the original" you're right that using git would make that easier. But if that happened, it would mean TaranisElsu would be around and maybe I could avoid maintaining a fork in the first place. :-)

It was based on 2.5.1.

Just curious, if you were to put it up on Bitbucket, you would still be using git, correct?

I suggested Github because the original is already up there, and it would merely be a  matter of forking it and putting in your changes.  Also, I know that CKAN works with github, but I'm not aware of any KSP mods which are on github (of course, I could be wrong :-)    )

Either way, it's your choice, and I do appreciate the work you did on TAC fuel balancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AdamMil

AdamMil

Posted
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said:

Just curious, if you were to put it up on Bitbucket, you would still be using git, correct?

No way, I'd be using Mercurial. :-P  Hmm. I do realize it's kind of evil to separate the revision histories, and I'd probably be convinced to use git on github for reasons like that. But is there some reason to create a github repository other than the one that's been given? I think the one-time convenience of being able to push back to the original tree if TaranisElsu ever comes back (rather than just email him a patch) would be more than offset by the one-time inconvenience of setting up the repository. I'm not really opposed to the idea; I just don't see what the benefit is.

Edited by AdamMil
Link to comment
Share on other sites
linuxgurugamer

linuxgurugamer

Posted
Posted

Well, to start, most people who mod KSP use git.  So anyone who would want to fork it would already be familiar with git, mercurial (which I use at work) isn't so popular.

Personally, I use git and have contributed to several other mods, having to switch to Mercurial for a single mod would not be worth it for me

Setting up a repo is trivial, and if you like, i could set it up, merge your patches and then turn the repo over to you on Github

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AdamMil

AdamMil

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, linuxgurugamer said:

Setting up a repo is trivial, and if you like, i could set it up, merge your patches and then turn the repo over to you on Github

Oh, I could set it up. It's just that I don't know what the benefit to me or others would be. For me, for a one-time change to a seemingly dead project, having a zip file with binaries and source seems perfectly convenient. But if you said "People want to do X and it's really inconvenient right now!" then I'd understand. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Stone Blue

Stone Blue

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, X1machinemaker1X said:

Will this version work with KSP 1.0.5 and if not, is there a release date for a compatible version?

 

20 hours ago, AdamMil said:

Yes, it works fine.

I'll also verify it works fine in 1.0.5 :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
gilflo

gilflo

Posted
Posted

Thank you for this this mod which is essential to play KSP with big and advanced ships, planes or rockets.

Would it be possible to make some improvements as follow:

As we are able to balance all or a part of the tanks, it would be great to be able to lock, transfert in or transfer out all or a part of the tanks ?

Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...