-
Posts
7,338 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by CobaltWolf
-
I looked at the config and nothing stuck out to me? I could swear it worked last time I used it.. ??? Do we need one..? Awwh that's cute! You'd want the launch trailer in game tho We almost got an ocean launch platform for Scout, back in the day. I'd like to see Pegasus in the mod as a Saturn 1 payload, we'll see. Work on the MLEM continues, will stream this weekend.
-
S-1D is definitely happening but yeah, probably as a top priority for the next round of parts after we've caught back up. But it's up there since it isn't a particularly hard thing to make and I know it's very popular/requested. It's definitely in the cards at some point, more a matter of figuring out how/where to make it happen. This isn't flyback Saturns - this would be the variety of recovery plans for the S-1, S-1C and S-IVB using parachutes and heatshields and such. I never really planned on doing Big Apollo, I've never seen much about it. Part of why Big G is cool is that in Kerbal terms it's sort of interchangeable with the Apollo capsule, so anything I make for one hopefully applies to both? But Big Apollo throws that out the window, where now I'm suddenly making a whole new set of parts for that and the SM and such. I hadn't thought about career tourist contracts tho, that definitely makes me pause a bit.
-
Hi everyone, sorry for the lack of updates this last week or so. I'm feeling exhausted and out of it. I'm going to wonder off into the woods for the weekend so no streams. Yeah, I actually forget that those ports are even in the mod. I don't plan on replacing them. No, sorry. There isn't really a way to do it that doesn't introduce more dependencies or require the players to own DLC. Additionally, wheels are perhaps the most cursed and dreaded of part types to try and get working. I've heard nothing but horror stories. The 260in parts (S-IVB and S-1 diameter) will be 4.25m. The S-IV is going to be 3.75m.
-
Oh, right. Well, I can assure that's not what it is. (I just wanted to respond to @Ollz's nice post with pictures and never got around to it last night) Regarding that pic though, I didn't realize until the other day that basically anything that wasn't crew piloted was considered an LM-Truck (called the LEM/T in some documents I have). So this would be an LM-Truck with an ELS as the payload. I need to figure out an elegant way to provide a control core for the descent stage that won't interfere with additions like this.