Jump to content

Spaceception

Members
  • Posts

    3,220
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spaceception

  1. This may have been answered a long time ago, but is this combinable? Can I stick one near the front, and another near the back, and have an extended warp bubble?
  2. So if I downloaded the reworked version of infernal robotics, would this still work just fine?
  3. Would it be possible for a binary gas giant system to share a medium sized moon, in like, a figure 8 orbit?
  4. Starts hiding plans to turn Venus and Earth into rocherworlds irl
  5. Well, the two planets, over time will merge with each other into one large planet, so it's a slow process I guess. There might be more, I'll need to check out Atomic rockets again. Is that binary gas giant/moon system possible?
  6. Hey guys!

    Can you help me with this? :P

     

    1. NSEP

      NSEP

      I will check maybe i could help.

    2. Spaceception
  7. Yesterday, It was pretty insane, but I'm updating to 1.3 so I have like 6 mods now, Near Future Electric/Construction/Solar, Heat control, Kerbal atomics (All by @Nertea and the JX2 antenna. Still working on it
  8. Okay! I know I've had several planet pack or part pack ideas floating around, but I've now decided what I want to do. Drumro- actually, it's in the title, so.... nvmnd.... Pic anyway: Now, I know there's a book all about it, but I'm not going to recreate the system (Sorry) Here's my plan, so far, only 7 bodies, may change in the future. Unknown star name: (Haven't come up with names yet, @ProtoJeb21 is pretty good at it though), this will be a star orbiting however far is 5-20x the distance from the furthest planet in OPM (Because I know you guys like that mod, and I'd like to make it compatible ) and is about 2/3 the size of Kerbol with around 1/3 its brightness. Unknown planet name b: This planet orbits its parent star very closely with an orbit more eccentric and inclined than Moho, and is hotter than Eve, it has a thin atmosphere (0.05-.15x probably) and about 3/4 the gravity of Kerbin, there is a stream of asteroids across the planets surface, with a massive impact basin almost half as wide as the planet, extending down to the mantle (Is this possible in KSP?) from a dwarf planet impact tens of millions of years ago, the remnants of which orbit in a highly inclined and eccentric orbit, both of which are very rich in ore, and I mean swimming, incentive to build a mining outpost? You'd need a buttload of radiators though. Protoplanet impactee name c: This world is very small, with about 5% of Kerbins gravity, and a very extreme orbit, it's very hard to get to, but once you do, you'll be rewarded with rich ore deposits. Rocheworld d (Will be renamed): These planets will be based on the ones featured in the book (Except the rest of the system of course), one side will be an ocean world, with over 90% of its surface being water, the other 9 percent is a large island on the opposite end of the planet, and archipelagos along the rim of the planet, and towards the other lobe caused by tidal effects, apparently in the book, it had less gravity than the moon, which probably isn't very realistic, but I'll settle for about 1/4 the gravity of Kerbin. The other lobe will be mostly a desert, with small lakes under the oceanic lobe, and will be very mountainous, with huge canyons, large slopes, and huge mountain ranges, there will be plenty of places to take a pretty screenshot. Both lobes will have atmospheres with oxygen, but the oceanic one will have more, the oceanic lobe will have an atmosphere extending about 65 km, and the desert lobe will have one extending 48 km, they will be close enough you can theoretically fly from one lobe to the other using only jet engines. Rotation? Dunno, I don't know which inclination they'll orbit each other at, but it'll be a short (And interesting) day/night, I'll tell you that, probably much shorter than Kerbins Unknown planet e: This will be a binary system between two gas giants about half and 2/3 the size of Jool, neither will have rings, and they share one moon which will orbit in a figure 8 pattern (At least, that's how I imagine it in my head) Unknown moon name 1b: This moon will be small and have about 1/3 the gravity of Kerbin with an atmosphere about half that of Kerbin's, it'll be volcanic and have large mountain ranges due to tidal effects, there will be small seas dotting the equator, and large poles, with extensive snow capped mountains, because of its odd orbit and small SOI, it'll be difficult to get an encounter, but the views will (Hopefully) be worth it. Go down 5 posts. What do you guys think? And please, I need all the suggestions/tips I can get, I'm very new at this, but I do have Notepad++ and GIMP installed, and I'm watching turtorials by @The White Guardian but I also need to know how possible some of these bodies are, because of their complexity, and I don't know if KSP will simulate it very well.
  9. While I was in the middle of deleting/updating my mods, I got sidetracked and decided to try the new engines out. And they are, GLORIOUS Screw LF/Lox engines, Nukes are the way to go!
  10. Sweetness, I can't wait to play around with the new parts! Thanks
  11. Great! I now have Kerbal atomics, so I have to get hydrogen lovers XD Anyway, you should post the KSP version on the title, so people know whether or not it's compatible.
  12. Oh nah gawd, that looks incredible!! I can't wait for the rest of my mods to be updated!! Also, the 1.25 antenna looks like wings, which I love
  13. @Angel-125 ayyyyy it does. So there's really only techtree issues with it?
  14. Okay. Well, I'm not going to mess with anything, but I'm going to run KSP and see if it shows up in my sandbox save, I was only looking in science mode until my game crapped out and I could do anything except hover over pieces.
  15. Well, I've checked the tech tree, and parts I have several times, it's not there anymore.
  16. I know that, this mod does though, and it seems like it's the only part that isn't showing up, so I'm guessing it has something to do with your mod, since I remember having up until I downloaded it
  17. @Angel-125 @Nertea I have a slight problem. A few weeks ago I downloaded Kerbal atomic, but now the Nuclear aerospike isn't showing up anymore, compatibility issues?
  18. Awesome! What kind of engines does it use, and what does it look like under acceleration?
  19. I prefer to do everything myself, it feels better that way, and if I fail, it makes me want to finish it even more (most of the time, I get frustrated sometimes) It's just the fact when I dock, they spin around each other in circles for several minutes, making it harder to get close, and it drives me insane, I MEAN, CAN YOU JUST DOCK ALREADY!? QUIT DANCING! It's also hard to use the rcs properly, for some reason, I can't figure out how to rotate the craft, only move it from side to side.
  20. *annoyed noises* I have the coolest idea for a Space station around the Mun using the centrifuge, but I need to git gud at rendezvous/docking first
  21. Alright, that definitely looks like a larger TRAPPIST 1 analog. Red dwarf parent Large number of Rocky planets No gas giants And potentially 4 habitable planets, just like in TRAPPIST 1!
×
×
  • Create New...