Jump to content

dave1904

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    845

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by dave1904

  1. dave1904
    Ok thanks. Ive a second issue too. Maybe related. It also happens on certain craft and I dont know how to recreate it. [EXC 18:23:34.934] NullReferenceException SystemHeat.UI.ToolbarIconTag.SetWarningNone () (at <2efe72f4cf3649c9bbc755ab96be8088>:0) SystemHeat.UI.ToolbarIconTag.Update (SystemHeat.SystemHeatSimulator simulator) (at <2efe72f4cf3649c9bbc755ab96be8088>:0) SystemHeat.UI.SystemHeatUI.Update () (at <2efe72f4cf3649c9bbc755ab96be8088>:0) UnityEngine.DebugLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object) ModuleManager.UnityLogHandle.InterceptLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object) UnityEngine.Debug:CallOverridenDebugHandler(Exception, Object)
  2. dave1904
    Any Idea what would cause this to spam my log? [LOG 13:28:16.169] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from True to False [LOG 13:28:16.190] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from False to True [LOG 13:28:16.190] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from True to False [LOG 13:28:16.211] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from False to True [LOG 13:28:16.211] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from True to False [LOG 13:28:16.232] [SystemHeat][ModuleSystemHeat] seting module tank system state from False to True An important thing to add is that im playing with kerbalismsystem heat too so it might be conflicting with the new version. I cannot really recreate it either because its different for different craft.
  3. dave1904
    I have a really nice Iva from a different mod too i believe. Cant remember what exactly. Will look into it if you need it.
  4. dave1904
  5. dave1904
    Is the price of the tracking station in the OPM custom barn kit supposed to be 36,480,000 or is that a typo?
  6. dave1904
    Personally I like to set the density multiplier on the mun to 0.1 but its to low for kerbin. What would the simplest config be to simply lower it for the mun?
  7. dave1904
    I've only been scammed once with KSP and it wasn't a modder.
  8. dave1904
    You know what's funny. I've waited for the new parallax for ages. Guess what happens. My 1200 euro ASUS monitor decides to die just after the warranty expires..... Thankfully my girlfriend repairs those things for a living but now I have to play on 1080p :(((
  9. dave1904
    Thanks. Will try it out tomorrow and give feedback. I've done 2 mun missions today and performance was so satisfying. My fan speeds on my CPU 12900k seem to be way lower. Not exactly a benchmark but I'm pretty certain I'm not imagining it.
  10. dave1904
    I didn't even need to change anything in the settings. So far performance is way better. Especially in low orbit and approaching the surface. 10 out of 10 :))
  11. dave1904
    You don't need to collect data or screenshots. I'm aware of the "risks". I play on 3.5 rescale and wouldn't want you to spend any time on that scale. 2.5 rescale would probably be the best one to test because the major part mods target that scale. I would assume its the most popular. Your time would be better spent on that scale. I'll download it this evening and give it a shot anyway. I've been looking forward to this for to long to wait honestly.
  12. dave1904
    Before I get this how well does it scale with rescaled systems compared to the previous versions? I'm aware it's not designed for it but neither was the last version. It still did pretty well. I'm assuming old planet config files for modded planets are not compatible either.
  13. dave1904
    @Rodger Did you delete the B9 SAS switch because the SAS upgrades were not being applied? It was the case for me. To bad because it was a really cool idea. Ablestar needs an engine ignitor patch for more ignitions. I've made one myself by copying the agena patch. I wish I knew that earlier that it was possible to do that.
  14. dave1904
    the elevons are the wrong way round but whatever. Works really well haha
  15. dave1904
    It seems a bit odd that there is no mention of Centaur in the cfg tags when it's model is obviously an adapter for it.
  16. dave1904
    Oh thanks. I forgot about that spreadsheet. Any chance we can have this part in white? It would also be very nice if there was an Inon and centaur tag on it because it took me ages to find that part originally.
  17. dave1904
    Does the Atlas LV-3C need the extension Tank to be historically accurate or not?
  18. dave1904
    Cheers. I love that channel since he made the titan sub video. I have looked into the chemical properties already. Mixture rates are just what im wondering about. I would have imagined it being heated to its liquid form in the tank already. Obviously insulating it from LOX and LH2 is an issuue.
  19. dave1904
  20. dave1904
    @Pappystein I'm making a fluorine,lithium Hydrogen tank type and was wondering if you or anyone else here would know the mixture ratios for an engine like that. Roughly at least. Atm I have it at LqHydrogen 3.75 Lithium 0.75 Fluorine 0.25 I've went for a 15:1 hydrogen flurine mixture but have no idea how much lithium is ideal. 15:3:1 was a wild guess haha. My current tank has half the mass of hydrogen/oxygen and it seem quite op. Any recommendations?
  21. dave1904
    Took me a while to try out the apollo ramp but its really sweet.
  22. dave1904
    no, ive not uploaded my cofigs anywhere because they are end user patched and would probably cause conflicts with other installs. Ive also changed alot of things to it but if you want to you can have them. That being said I only changed 1 line in the exploration config. Forgot why. You can link me your modlist and I can try it out.
  23. dave1904
    I have the same issue. I could have sworn that it used to work.
  24. dave1904
    I'm aware that I would be more rigid. My point is that the increased dry mass with a monocoque tank and more powerful engine might have made the S-V pointless because the volume of fuel is no larger than Centaur-D. It might have been able to carry a heavier payload but not have had the energy to do much with it.
  25. dave1904
    That makes me wonder if the S-V would have any purpose whatsoever. Isn't the high energy of centaur the only reason it exists. Centaur-V is still more centaur than most other rocket stages that carry the names of their successors. It is after all an evolution unlike Delta-IV or Atlas-III that are fundamentally different rockets.
×
×
  • Create New...