Jump to content
[[Template core/front/profile/profileHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

 Content Type 

Posts posted by DunaManiac

    Thread to discuss negative things in a very general way, just see where it goes y'know?

    in The Lounge

    Posted

    I have an online course in astronomy on Coursera that I do in my spare time.

    Anyways, I finished my weekly writing assignment and I peer-reviewed about 10 assignments.

    Guess what?

    I had to flag 6 of them for plagiarism.

    The most stupid part was that 4 of them were from the same source, Our Solar System's Cousin? – Exoplanet Exploration: Planets Beyond our Solar System (nasa.gov).

    It's the first result on a google search. Some tried to hide it by changing some of the wording hoping nobody would notice, but a simple google search incriminates them.

    Seriously.

    If you're going to plagiarize, at least do it more discreetly.

    Kopernicus Has No Effect

    in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)

    Posted

    On 12/7/2020 at 3:33 PM, MoneyBags said:

    @Stone Blue

    @DunaManiac

    Hi!

    I'm on KSP version 1.10.1, and I have Kopernicus branch dev1101.

    Right now, I'm just trying to get Kopernicus to work, and I am changing the names of the bodies as a simple means of testing the functionality. If I get it to work, I will hopefully be able to mod/make planets :)

    Attached is a link to my GameData screenshot and logs.

    https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ahs7bBOdLLt0gULSIPsmowjec0ol?e=pa6KMh

    Thanks ever so much!

    By the way, display name is still incorrect. It should be:

    displayName = Notkerbin^N

    I'm sorry if this wasn't clear earlier.

    Kopernicus Has No Effect

    in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)

    Posted

    3 hours ago, MoneyBags said:

    Thank for replying! Unfortunately, I still can't figure out how to do this.

    I have all the dependencies that came with Kopernicus. These are Modular Flight Integrator, and Module Manager. Are these all I need, or am I missing something?

    I made a file just like the one you demonstrated. 

    
@Kopernicus:AFTER[Kopernicus]
{
	@Body Kerbin
	{
		@Properties
		{
			displayName = NotKerbin^N
		}
	}
}

    I named it Kerbin.cfg, and put it in the Config file in Kopernicus. I'm not sure if this is the right place to put it, but it did seem to have some effect because when it was there, Module Manager said it had applied 8 patches instead of 7. Even then, Kerbin was still stubbornly named Kerbin. Do you know anything else that could have caused the problem?

     

    P.S. Is the ^N a new line character?

    You need to put the config inside Gamedata. Additionally, the correct notation is @Body[Kerbin], not @Body Kerbin.

    Kopernicus Has No Effect

    in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)

    Posted · Edited by DunaManiac

    15 hours ago, MoneyBags said:

    Hi! Recently I've been trying to get Kopernicus to work . I downloaded the latest version from GitHub. Then, I followed the directions -copy the items from the Kopernicus GameData folder into my KSP GameData folder. Then, just to test it, I tried changing the name of several celestial bodies in the system.cfg. When I launched KSP, the module manager showed up and said "Module Manager: 7 patches applied," but absolutely nothing had changed in the game. I tried getting a different version from GitHub. I tried messing with the Kopernicus examples, and changing textures. I couldn't find any documentation of other people having the same problem. I'm using windows, I have both expansion packs installed, and my only other mod is Kerbal Engineer. Help!
    :0.0:

     

    Firstly, make sure that you have downloaded all the dependencies. That includes Module Flight Integrator. Second, you cannot modify the bodies' names in system.cfg.

    In order to make a patch that changes a planets name, look at this: 

    @Kopernicus:AFTER[Kopernicus]
{
	@Body[planet name here]
	{
		@Properties
		{
			displayName = [new planet name here]^N
		}
	}
}

    This should be correct.

    What is the most HORRIBLE way one of your kerbals died

    in KSP1 Discussion

    Posted

    Once I had a spaceplane, and it was returning from LKO. The mission was to recover two stranded kerbonauts on my space station, as they had been there for over 2 years. As I was entering the atmosphere during reentry, I accidentally made Legee Kerman exit the cockpit, which she died soon after. The plane and the remaining returned safely, luckily, but the death was accidental and she will be missed.

    Coronavirus

    in Science & Spaceflight

    Posted · Edited by DunaManiac

    3 minutes ago, Boyster said:

    Ok, i get it, so the problem is that vaccines targets mainly the viruses that mutate less to have the most effectiveness, but eventually those minor ones that left alone, become stronger and stronger

     

    As I understand it, it's not that those viruses are less adaptable, it's that the strains targeted get killed, but the immune strain is not killed by the vaccine, it's not a matter of adaptability, it's a matter of immunity to the vaccine.

    (Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong).

    SPACE STATIONS! Post your pictures here

    in KSP1 The Spacecraft Exchange

    Posted

    A small space station called Starlab.

    t2IWFUu.png

    Starlab began it's life as the Deep Space Zero G lab, launched as a single launch space station. It's original mission was to study the effects of Zero G on kerbals, which it turned out to be practically nonexistent.

    Spoiler

    e4jEbtZ.png

    UFwtYbq.png

    054CNsC.png

    Starlab was visited by a spaceplane, the Eclipse, which crewed it, and the rest of the 2 years aboard the space station passed by uneventfully.

    z6gn7B5.png

    The space station was visited once again to decrew it, and the space station was reorganized awaiting the addition of new modules.

    NwxDxj7.png

    And such, 7 modules were added to the Deep Space Zero G lab, renamed Starlab.

    What did you do in KSP1 today?

    in KSP1 Discussion

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, vv3k70r said:

    Could You dock it back so straight that it fly corectly?

    7 hours ago, IncompetentSpacer said:

    Yeah. It's designed to be reusable, and it's connected by docking ports on the ground. There's really one way it can dock, and that is the correct one.

×
×
  • Create New...